Can we talk about Germany for a bit?

Can we talk about Germany for a bit?

Author
Discussion

irocfan

40,388 posts

190 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
irocfan said:
ahhhh I remember - you're one of those. Anyone who doesn't agree with your worldview is either backwards or racist. Thanks for reminding us
Your brothers in arms in Wasungen are being investigated for their antics and the parade association has apologized about the hayseeds with their WWII tank.

Stay strong little man, you are clearly suffering for your beliefs.
I'll give you a pass on that as they're not that far away from where I was born. That being said IIRC the article stated that it was an ironic dig at those of the idiotic far right (in the same way the Charlie H does similar things)

Adenauer

18,569 posts

236 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Stay strong little man, you are clearly suffering for your beliefs.
Why do you go out of your way to try and belittle people all of the time? It just makes you look like an utter idiot.


dudleybloke

19,803 posts

186 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Stay strong little man, you are clearly suffering for your beliefs.
How many people in Europe will suffer because of your beliefs?

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

134 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
irocfan said:
IIRC the article stated that it was an ironic dig at those of the idiotic far right (in the same way the Charlie H does similar things)
The BBC piece cites unnamed "social media users" for this. Compelling.

Meanwhile, the office of the public prosecutor is investigating the group under suspicion of sedition. And a cute aside, Tiger 142 was part of the 2nd SS Panzer Division/ Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler.

Keep on fighting, brother.

Edited by scherzkeks on Tuesday 9th February 14:02

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
To be clear sherzkeks, are you simply unconcerned by mass Muslim immigration, or actually in favour of it? And if the latter, why?

irocfan

40,388 posts

190 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
irocfan said:
IIRC the article stated that it was an ironic dig at those of the idiotic far right (in the same way the Charlie H does similar things)
The BBC piece cites unnamed "social media users" for this. Compelling.

Meanwhile, the office of the public prosecutor is investigating the group under suspicion of sedition. And a cute aside, Tiger 142 was part of the 2nd SS Panzer Division/ Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler.

Keep on fighting, brother.

Edited by scherzkeks on Tuesday 9th February 14:02
say what you like but please 'brother'.... ahhhh fk it, I broke the rule bangheadbangheadbanghead. <note to self> I must ignore the fkwits

Beati Dogu

8,883 posts

139 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
And a cute aside, Tiger 142 was part of the 2nd SS Panzer Division/ Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler.

Keep on fighting, brother.
It was used by the regular German army and blown up by its crew after being disabled in North Africa by the British in 1943.

The 2nd SS Panzer Division was "Das Reich".


scherzkeks

4,460 posts

134 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
It was used by the regular German army and blown up by its crew after being disabled in North Africa by the British in 1943.

The 2nd SS Panzer Division was "Das Reich".
Interesting. Some guy quoted at Zeit claims otherwise. LS A.H. is the 1st SS Panzer Division.

http://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2016...



irocfan

40,388 posts

190 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
scherzkeks said:
And a cute aside, Tiger 142 was part of the 2nd SS Panzer Division/ Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler.

Keep on fighting, brother.
It was used by the regular German army and blown up by its crew after being disabled in North Africa by the British in 1943.

The 2nd SS Panzer Division was "Das Reich".
and photographic evidence would seem to back you up on this...

http://www.tiif.de/thread.php?threadid=436

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

134 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
This whole affair reminds me of an old Vice piece where an NPD functionary tries to talk around the fact that the local NPD headquarters has a watch tower and a grill that says Happy Holocaust.

http://www.vice.com/de/video/die-neue-npd




Catweazle

1,154 posts

142 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Beati Dogu said:
It was used by the regular German army and blown up by its crew after being disabled in North Africa by the British in 1943.

The 2nd SS Panzer Division was "Das Reich".
Interesting. Some guy quoted at Zeit claims otherwise. LS A.H. is the 1st SS Panzer Division.

http://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2016...
The turret markings merely denote the company, platoon and vehicle in a battalion so 142 is the second tank of the fourth platoon in the first company.

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
Mama Merkel under pressure from her allies at home.


guardian said:
Angela Merkel is struggling to contain a Bavarian rebellion against her handling of the refugee crisis, as the leader of the sister party to the German chancellor’s Christian Democrats accused her of pursuing a “rule of injustice”.

In highly unusual comments for a member of a governing coalition, Horst Seehofer, the head of the Christian Social Union (CSU) in Bavaria, told Passauer Neue Presse newspaper: “We don’t currently have a state of law and order. It is a rule of injustice.”

“Rule of injustice” (herrschaft des unrechts) is a loaded phrase in Germany, where it evokes the term unrechtsstaat, normally only used to describe dictatorships or oppressive regimes such as the German Democratic Republic (GDR).
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/10/bavarian-leader-horst-seehofer-lashes-out-merkels-handling-refugee-crisis

Digga

40,300 posts

283 months

Thursday 11th February 2016
quotequote all
Year on year figures for Jan/Feb immigration are sobering:


danllama

5,728 posts

142 months

Thursday 11th February 2016
quotequote all
Digga said:
Year on year figures for Jan/Feb immigration are sobering:

Why aren't we doing anything to stop it?? Do these people just have free movement between Turkey and France?

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Thursday 11th February 2016
quotequote all
That's sheer insanity. This is simply an invasion.

EricE

1,945 posts

129 months

Thursday 11th February 2016
quotequote all
AJS- said:
That's sheer insanity. This is simply an invasion.
One of my friends, the most liberal I know — the type who stood at the train station with a "welcome" banner — volunteers at a refugee camp.
She talked to a group of 18 year old Moroccans who are perfectly aware that they have no chance of getting asylum here. They simply booked a flight from Agadir to Istanbul, threw away their passports and joined the lines of refugees to see what europe is like. They plan to stay as long as they can (until they are deported).
It was interesting to see her sentiment change over the last few weeks/months. Since her husband is a politician she called up the ministry of interior and told them that the flow of migrants needs to stop as soon as possible. laugh

Digga

40,300 posts

283 months

Thursday 11th February 2016
quotequote all
EricE said:
One of my friends, the most liberal I know — the type who stood at the train station with a "welcome" banner — volunteers at a refugee camp.
She talked to a group of 18 year old Moroccans who are perfectly aware that they have no chance of getting asylum here. They simply booked a flight from Agadir to Istanbul, threw away their passports and joined the lines of refugees to see what europe is like. They plan to stay as long as they can (until they are deported).
It was interesting to see her sentiment change over the last few weeks/months. Since her husband is a politician she called up the ministry of interior and told them that the flow of migrants needs to stop as soon as possible. laugh
Sadly, as you say we and the Syrian refugees are both being exploited here.

Unfortunately, whilst I hold a great many liberal views close to my heart - equality of age, gender, sexual orientation and race, along with the principal of helping refugees - there is a pradigm-shift here of unprecedented magnitude. Without management and control - and both are distinctly lacking on an EU-wide scale - we have chaos and without chaos we have lawlessness and if we allow that situation to develop, we begin to loose all that we hold dear about Western European life, including those core liberal values.

The debate and reaction thus far has been about as objective as taking children to a dogs rescue centre; there is no logic by which you can reason that they can only 'save' one animal and that several (at least) could not be brought back to the family home. We're not talking about humans facing certain termination here, fortunately, even for the genuine refugees, and there are alternatives, including setting up safe camps and zones outside of the EU, but there is almost no end of people from poor, developing nations who would not want to follow last year's migrants into the EU if the situation is not managed.

Sam All

3,101 posts

101 months

Thursday 11th February 2016
quotequote all
Digga said:
EricE said:
One of my friends, the most liberal I know — the type who stood at the train station with a "welcome" banner — volunteers at a refugee camp.
She talked to a group of 18 year old Moroccans who are perfectly aware that they have no chance of getting asylum here. They simply booked a flight from Agadir to Istanbul, threw away their passports and joined the lines of refugees to see what europe is like. They plan to stay as long as they can (until they are deported).
It was interesting to see her sentiment change over the last few weeks/months. Since her husband is a politician she called up the ministry of interior and told them that the flow of migrants needs to stop as soon as possible. laugh
Sadly, as you say we and the Syrian refugees are both being exploited here.

Unfortunately, whilst I hold a great many liberal views close to my heart - equality of age, gender, sexual orientation and race, along with the principal of helping refugees - there is a pradigm-shift here of unprecedented magnitude. Without management and control - and both are distinctly lacking on an EU-wide scale - we have chaos and without chaos we have lawlessness and if we allow that situation to develop, we begin to loose all that we hold dear about Western European life, including those core liberal values.

The debate and reaction thus far has been about as objective as taking children to a dogs rescue centre; there is no logic by which you can reason that they can only 'save' one animal and that several (at least) could not be brought back to the family home. We're not talking about humans facing certain termination here, fortunately, even for the genuine refugees, and there are alternatives, including setting up safe camps and zones outside of the EU, but there is almost no end of people from poor, developing nations who would not want to follow last year's migrants into the EU if the situation is not managed.
Good posts. Leaders are Naive & hopeless.

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Thursday 11th February 2016
quotequote all

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Thursday 11th February 2016
quotequote all
AJS- said:
That's sheer insanity. This is simply an invasion.
That's a bit melodramatic don't you think?

It's a serious situation and more needs to be done to stop people making the journey through Mediterranean but it's hardly an 'invasion'? laugh