What a huge waste of public money

What a huge waste of public money

Author
Discussion

cirian75

4,260 posts

233 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
CPS is going to send every single reported incident of this nature to court.

Its a massive knee jerk to blind eye they turned on what the like of Saville and Jenner was up to right under their noses.

Yes, they will nail some right scum bags

BUT, they will be getting convictions on wholly innocent men too who can't afford top flight legal representation like this bloke, I still think DLT has been stitched up by the CPS.

There will be others right now who are languishing in jail, now or awaiting trial who the police and CPS know are innocent.

There will be in about 10 to 20 years a whole slew of convictions quashed.

maxxy5

771 posts

164 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
I don't think this would even be in the news if it wasn't a 'famous' actress involved (who the accused said he didn't even recognise in court). That's the worrying thought.

cirian75

4,260 posts

233 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
maxxy5 said:
I don't think this would even be in the news if it wasn't a 'famous' actress involved (who the accused said he didn't even recognise in court). That's the worrying thought.
It would have not gone to court if the woman was a Joanne public.

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
cirian75 said:
maxxy5 said:
I don't think this would even be in the news if it wasn't a 'famous' actress involved (who the accused said he didn't even recognise in court). That's the worrying thought.
It would have not gone to court if the woman was a Joanne public.
How do you know?
Assume there's no cctv too so just one word against another
How far would it go with ordinary Joe

cirian75

4,260 posts

233 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
cirian75 said:
maxxy5 said:
I don't think this would even be in the news if it wasn't a 'famous' actress involved (who the accused said he didn't even recognise in court). That's the worrying thought.
It would have not gone to court if the woman was a Joanne public.
How do you know?
Assume there's no cctv too so just one word against another
How far would it go with ordinary Joe
ordinary Joe would be screwed with out CCTV to prove otherwise the way the CPS is behaving right now, which is convict no matter the cost or the facts, they tried to alter the CCTV in this case, something is rotten at the core of the CPS.

cirian75

4,260 posts

233 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
and it seems the higher ups have finally realised something is wrong with the way the Police/CPS is behaving with sex case too.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35538655

A10

633 posts

99 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
Only for famous people though...

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
cirian75 said:
ordinary Joe would be screwed with out CCTV to prove otherwise the way the CPS is behaving right now, which is convict no matter the cost or the facts, they tried to alter the CCTV in this case, something is rotten at the core of the CPS.
this ^^^^

there needs to be a genuine investigation into what happened in this case, who pushed it to trial, who authorised the doctoring of the video evidence, etc etc.

PurpleMoonlight

Original Poster:

22,362 posts

157 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
cirian75 said:
and it seems the higher ups have finally realised something is wrong with the way the Police/CPS is behaving with sex case too.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35538655
Oh excellent!

That will probably take 5 years, cost £5M, and achieve bugger all.

cirian75

4,260 posts

233 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
cirian75 said:
and it seems the higher ups have finally realised something is wrong with the way the Police/CPS is behaving with sex case too.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35538655
Oh excellent!

That will probably take 5 years, cost £5M, and achieve bugger all.
I would laugh if it wasn't so true.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
cirian75 said:
and it seems the higher ups have finally realised something is wrong with the way the Police/CPS is behaving with sex case too.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35538655
Hang on, I thought celebrities had a hold on the CPS, according to one of the theories on this thread.



TTwiggy

11,538 posts

204 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
La Liga said:
ang on, I thought celebrities had a hold on the CPS, according to one of the theories on this thread.
Only female (Burn them! Burn them!) celebrities.

irocfan

40,440 posts

190 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
cirian75 said:
ordinary Joe would be screwed with out CCTV to prove otherwise the way the CPS is behaving right now, which is convict no matter the cost or the facts, they tried to alter the CCTV in this case, something is rotten at the core of the CPS.
say what now? I've not really looked too much at this thread but WTF?

TTwiggy

11,538 posts

204 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
irocfan said:
cirian75 said:
ordinary Joe would be screwed with out CCTV to prove otherwise the way the CPS is behaving right now, which is convict no matter the cost or the facts, they tried to alter the CCTV in this case, something is rotten at the core of the CPS.
say what now? I've not really looked too much at this thread but WTF?
For clarification it was played back at a different frame rate. This may have been done for nefarious reasons or maybe to make the sequence of events easier to follow. That's not to say that it isn't significant or should be overlooked.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
There's clearly been a historic culture of 'celebrity' / high-profile sexual abuse. There's clearly been a lot of reporting and accusations. The whole event / operation is unique in a lot of ways. The scale is unprecedented and so is the publicity and scrutiny.

In what world do people imagine that there won't be 'things to learn' and aspects that could have been done better? Take any large business that goes through something large-scale and unique for the first time (especially where the scale and pace is largely driven by external demand and variables), will they have nothing to learn or aspects that could be done better? It's collective human and organisational behaviour.

The hindsight bias part is the best. People, who have no concept of the above, are happy when it turns out someone did something wrong, and it can be proven. But not happy when it turns out someone has done something wrong and it cannot be proven.

At the risk of stating the obvious; you do not know this when people are presenting themselves and making allegations.




dandarez

13,282 posts

283 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
La Liga said:
There's clearly been a historic culture of 'celebrity' / high-profile sexual abuse. There's clearly been a lot of reporting and accusations. The whole event / operation is unique in a lot of ways. The scale is unprecedented and so is the publicity and scrutiny.

In what world do people imagine that there won't be 'things to learn' and aspects that could have been done better? Take any large business that goes through something large-scale and unique for the first time (especially where the scale and pace is largely driven by external demand and variables), will they have nothing to learn or aspects that could be done better? It's collective human and organisational behaviour.

The hindsight bias part is the best. People, who have no concept of the above, are happy when it turns out someone did something wrong, and it can be proven. But not happy when it turns out someone has done something wrong and it cannot be proven.

At the risk of stating the obvious; you do not know this when people are presenting themselves and making allegations.
What world? There's always been 'things to learn'. It's 'always' been that way.
That's not the point.
The point is that in the last 20 odd years I have never, ever, heard so many utterings from those in authority of 'lessons will be learned', yet endlessly, they never, ever, fking are!!!!

Is that plain enough?

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
dandarez said:
What world? There's always been 'things to learn'. It's 'always' been that way.
That's not the point.
The point is that in the last 20 odd years I have never, ever, heard so many utterings from those in authority of 'lessons will be learned', yet endlessly, they never, ever, fking are!!!!

Is that plain enough?
The world of PH. You hear that phrase from all organisations. Plenty of things get improved through that approach to things.

bitchstewie

51,208 posts

210 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
La Liga said:
I certainly think the accused deserves a full explanation from the CPS as to why the concluded there'd be a realistic prospect of conviction.
Thanks for the (full) explanation - I lean towards cock up rather than consipiracy tbh, but I'm struggling to see how anyone could make what seems like such an obvious cock-up smile

///ajd

8,964 posts

206 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
I'm surprised this is not a bigger story in the media as it appears so ludicrous.

Certainly as newsworthy as Plebgate in some respects, and that was on the telly for days!

Has it only appeared in the original paper, or has there been any updates/follow ups?


Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

158 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
La Liga said:
You hear that phrase from all organisations. Plenty of things get improved through that approach to things.
And yet there are lessons still to be learned, every time.