German train crash

Author
Discussion

Jos Notstoppen

Original Poster:

496 posts

141 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
Head on crash between 2 trains

details here
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35530538

danllama

5,728 posts

142 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
Nasty accident. Can't see anything on how it happened...

Digga

40,317 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
danllama said:
Nasty accident. Can't see anything on how it happened...
Head-on on a single track. How was it not going to happen?

Likly to be one of two things really:
  1. increect signalling, or
  2. driver error

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
Radio just said one derailed and the other hit it. never mentioned same track.

bbc reports head on same track

Edited by Pesty on Tuesday 9th February 12:15

wolves_wanderer

12,387 posts

237 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Radio just said one derailed and the other hit it. never mentioned same track.
They were talking about them both being on a single track this morning.

matchmaker

8,490 posts

200 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
Head on is by far the deadliest type of train crash.

M4cruiser

3,640 posts

150 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
Digga said:
Likly to be one of two things really:
  1. increect signalling, or
  2. driver error
Looks quite a bad one, now the news is coming out. 10 people dead, many injured.

Must have been quite awful for those on the trains; I travel a lot and it's often in the back of my mind "what if".

A bit early to conclude a cause though Digga, lots of possibilities for us to speculate on. In either case (signal or error) the automatic braking should have kicked in. In some systems the driver can override it, allowing for the (remote) possibility of another German suicide like the Alps aircraft.





Rich1973

1,198 posts

177 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
A certain irony with your username OP.
Terrible event.

sirtyro

1,824 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th February 2016
quotequote all
In this kind of accident is it better to be facing the opposite direction of travel?! Guessing inertia would carry a forward facing passenger further but all sounds terrible!

Digga

40,317 posts

283 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
M4cruiser said:
A bit early to conclude a cause though Digga, lots of possibilities for us to speculate on. In either case (signal or error) the automatic braking should have kicked in. In some systems the driver can override it, allowing for the (remote) possibility of another German suicide like the Alps aircraft.
Early, but given the way rail lines work, there's not too many variable. I suppose equipment failure; points or brakes is a further possibility.

M4cruiser

3,640 posts

150 months

Wednesday 10th February 2016
quotequote all
sirtyro said:
In this kind of accident is it better to be facing the opposite direction of travel?! Guessing inertia would carry a forward facing passenger further but all sounds terrible!
Yes, usually best to face backwards ...
... provided the seats are strong enough ... unless the train is hit from behind!

This is what happens if the seats don't contain you, this has been posted on the road crash thread and is a motor coach being hit from behind, the action starts at 59s and the bit with passengers being jettisoned rearwards out of their seats is from 1:14:-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT65nwFPw6U

But I'd still rather face backwards on a train, I don't fancy being thrown forwards into the table in front of me.



Digga

40,317 posts

283 months

Tuesday 16th February 2016
quotequote all
Digga said:
Head-on on a single track. How was it not going to happen?

Likly to be one of two things really:
  1. incorrect signalling, or YES
  2. driver error NO
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35585302

[]quote=BBC]Human error by a train controller was to blame for a crash in Bavaria, Germany, last week that killed 11 people, prosecutors said.

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

132 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
Difficult to believe that a modern(ish) railway control system could allow such a catastrophic failure as a result of inadvertent human error by one person. The Victorians could design control systems to prevent similar.

matchmaker

8,490 posts

200 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
V8 Fettler said:
Difficult to believe that a modern(ish) railway control system could allow such a catastrophic failure as a result of inadvertent human error by one person. The Victorians could did design control systems to prevent similar.

maffski

1,868 posts

159 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
V8 Fettler said:
Difficult to believe that a modern(ish) railway control system could allow such a catastrophic failure as a result of inadvertent human error by one person. The Victorians could design control systems to prevent similar.
Unless that human error was to turn off the protection system so one train could nip through before the other.

BBC said:
The stretch of line had an automatic signalling system designed to halt any train that passed a stop signal.
But reports in German media suggested that the system had been switched off to let the eastbound train, which was running late, go past.

dirkgently

2,160 posts

231 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
Try doing that with a token system.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
dirkgently said:
Try doing that with a token system.
Accidents are always possible where human beings are involved.

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

132 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
maffski said:
V8 Fettler said:
Difficult to believe that a modern(ish) railway control system could allow such a catastrophic failure as a result of inadvertent human error by one person. The Victorians could design control systems to prevent similar.
Unless that human error was to turn off the protection system so one train could nip through before the other.

BBC said:
The stretch of line had an automatic signalling system designed to halt any train that passed a stop signal.
But reports in German media suggested that the system had been switched off to let the eastbound train, which was running late, go past.
If fatalities are likely to result following deactivation of the automatic signalling system then ensure that deactivation requires several deliberate actions by more than one person at more than one location. Layers of defence.

If electric traction then link the auto signal system to the power system, no auto signal system = no power.

Digga

40,317 posts

283 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
In essence, this is sadly not a million miles away from the cause of the Alton Towers rollercoaster crash.

krunchkin

2,209 posts

141 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
Digga said:
In essence, this is sadly not a million miles away from the cause of the Alton Towers rollercoaster crash.
Indeed. What is the point of having failsafes if they are able to be manually overridden at the flick of a switch?