Post EU renegotiation poll, have opinions changed?

Post EU renegotiation poll, have opinions changed?

Poll: Post EU renegotiation poll, have opinions changed?

Total Members Polled: 377

I will vote to stay IN: 14%
I will vote to LEAVE: 75%
I am still undecided: 11%
Author
Discussion

Scuffers

Original Poster:

20,887 posts

275 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
OK, we have had the Chamberlin moment, CMD's got his 'deal', is it enough or just a total farce?


AJS-

15,366 posts

237 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Total farce.

Trumpeting the fact that the British government may no longer have to pay child benefit to Romanians living in Romania, as a result of his negotiations with some unelected foreign bureaucrats, as though that were proof that we have a flourishing democracy within the EU.

I've been in favour of leaving for pretty much my entire adult life an never more so than now.

DrDeAtH

3,588 posts

233 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
I don't see why the UK should be paying benefits to overseas children anyway. This renegotiation is a total farce and will be reneged on at the earliest opportunity.

Nothing of real worth has been negotiated, no sovereignty, no overuling of ECJ

I'm still out....

MickC

1,024 posts

259 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
AJS- said:
Total farce.

Trumpeting the fact that the British government may no longer have to pay child benefit to Romanians living in Romania, as a result of his negotiations with some unelected foreign bureaucrats, as though that were proof that we have a flourishing democracy within the EU.

I've been in favour of leaving for pretty much my entire adult life an never more so than now.
Um. We would still have to pay them, but only at 'Romainian Standard of Living' levels. And even that's open to legalities. What a waste of time.

Scuffers

Original Poster:

20,887 posts

275 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
MickC said:
Um. We would still have to pay them, but only at 'Romainian Standard of Living' levels. And even that's open to legalities. What a waste of time.
Why would we still have to pay?


Richjam

318 posts

189 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
MickC said:
Um. We would still have to pay them, but only at 'Romainian Standard of Living' levels. And even that's open to legalities. What a waste of time.
Why would we still have to pay?
Thats the deal thats been negotiated. If there child benefit rate is higher than ours I assume we would have to match it according to the deal. Maybe we could just scrap child benefit totally and not pay it to anyone?

Don

28,377 posts

285 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Interesting. Once again PH is not a barometer of public opinion. But as an indication my view on how this will turn out is being borne out here, at least.

I don't think Cameron could get a deal that would impress PH.

Scuffers

Original Poster:

20,887 posts

275 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Richjam said:
Scuffers said:
MickC said:
Um. We would still have to pay them, but only at 'Romainian Standard of Living' levels. And even that's open to legalities. What a waste of time.
Why would we still have to pay?
Thats the deal thats been negotiated. If there child benefit rate is higher than ours I assume we would have to match it according to the deal. Maybe we could just scrap child benefit totally and not pay it to anyone?
If we leave, we pay nothing.

As a side, i think it should be scrapped full stop, it was created to deal with a problem that simply no longer exists.

MickC

1,024 posts

259 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Richjam said:
Scuffers said:
MickC said:
Um. We would still have to pay them, but only at 'Romainian Standard of Living' levels. And even that's open to legalities. What a waste of time.
Why would we still have to pay?
Thats the deal thats been negotiated. If there child benefit rate is higher than ours I assume we would have to match it according to the deal. Maybe we could just scrap child benefit totally and not pay it to anyone?
Yup. That's the really good deal Cameron got - we still have to pay children of migrant workers working in the UK even when those children live in another EU country. Just we get to recalculate it based on that countries standard of living. Which not only is not what we wanted, but is also open to massive legal wrangling. Hopeless.

I still don't get how we can be in such a weak negotiating position when we are basically giving the money away to poorer countries, its like Africa getting to vote on how much overseas aid can afford to send them...

rdjohn

6,189 posts

196 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Superficially, I think he got a deal that would satisfy a lot of people's concerns about ever closer integration and membership of the Euro. But then there is Martin Shultz saying that his parliament will decide what concessions the UK can have.

The deal seems to say we are happy to pay the membership fees, but fundamentally we do not share the same vision as the other members of the club. The only logical answer to that position is to leave and not pay the membership fees.

All we need is a European free trade area. Contributing to the CAP and the myriad of EU mad ideas is why so many want to leave.

Jasandjules

69,931 posts

230 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Reducing this to a basic level. We pay more in than we get out. Thus, to leave will be a net gain to us.

Hoofy

76,387 posts

283 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
I heard that for all of his requests (not that they were a big deal anyway), there was no set date so he could get a vote to stay in and just not bother with anything, 10 years down the line, we're just as we are today.

CAPP0

19,601 posts

204 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Why can the rules not be set, across all benefits, to state that if you choose to live elsewhere in the EU than your country of nationality, i.e. the country issuing your passport, you will only be entitled to the benefit payable in your country of nationality? Thus, if you are, say, Romanian and you decide to live in the UK, you will get 30p/week child benefit rather than £30/week? This should apply across all forms of benefit. It's then a simple economic choice for the migrant (much as it is now, but for other reasons!).

Scuffers

Original Poster:

20,887 posts

275 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Really?

We need to get away from paying benefits full stop for everybody.

If we got peoples employers to pay proper wages, then there would be non reason to pay any benefits outside of hardship and unemployment.

this country along with the EU has gone down the route of high tax/high benefit Society which has to be the most inefficient way of providing a working living to everybody that man could possibly devise.

Ridley

225 posts

101 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Don said:
I don't think Cameron could get a deal that would impress PH.
Yep. And it looks like the OP hasn't even read the deal before deciding it's a farce.

Scuffers

Original Poster:

20,887 posts

275 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Ridley said:
Yep. And it looks like the OP hasn't even read the deal before deciding it's a farce.
Yes, i have, have you?

Nothing in that deal is even a certainly, the EU can cast it out at any moment.

Please tell me what's in this deal that's worth anything other than some words?

Watching cmd on tv new, it's a f**king joke, most of the benefits he keeps going on about are nothing to do with our membership of the EU.


Ridley

225 posts

101 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
Ridley said:
Yep. And it looks like the OP hasn't even read the deal before deciding it's a farce.
Yes, i have, have you?
Then why didn't you know that child benefit would still be paid?

steve_k

579 posts

206 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
The whole deals is empty promises and call me Dave resorted to scaremongering in his post deal press statement ths says it all he knows he got nothing and thinks we wont notice.

If we stay in none of the promises will ever happen he knows it we know it and he thinks if he can he fool enough of the public to get a in vote in the coming years all the promises will be quietly dropped due to EU laws.

With social media the public are better informed now that any other time in history I dont think his plan will work and hope for a out vote and some real re negotiations with our trading agreements with Europe its not like they wont deal with us if we leave.

The German car industry will put a lot of pressure on its politicians to make sure a trading deal is done quickly and fairly as they have too much to lose.

If Brussels are awkward if we leave the whole pack of cards will collapse and the EU will be finished Germany wont stand for silly games or they will also walk.



Scuffers

Original Poster:

20,887 posts

275 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Ridley said:
Then why didn't you know that child benefit would still be paid?
sorry where I said otherwise or even implied such?

Pan Pan Pan

9,928 posts

112 months

Sunday 21st February 2016
quotequote all
Ironically, I was someone who wanted the ability to vote for staying IN a reformed EU, I really hoped the member states would see this as the best opportunity for a long time, to get the EU onto an honest, fair footing, which would allow it to continue.
Unfortunately having looked as far as I can, at the way we came into the thing, and the way it has been run since our joining, my naïve hopes for something better (not just for the UK but for the whole EU) have been swept away like smoke in a gale.
It seems the majority of the member states are happier keeping the corrupt, unfair, system that exists now in place. If we vote IN, no one can complain at what happens to the UK next, other than those who voted to try getting us out of the whole stinking mess.