EDF - Hinkley Point 'C'

Author
Discussion

paulrockliffe

15,705 posts

227 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
The problem is that there are no grown ups on the horizon. I left school and spent a year at Sellafield before going University 16 years ago, they were working out where to put new nuclear build then, it had been urgently needed for a decade or two and something had to be done. Nothing has really happened since, we're 30 years past the point where this needed to start.

I've mentioned this before, but in 2000 we owned Westinghouse and could have done all this much simpler than now. Gordon Brown sold it off for pocket change to Hitachi. Westinghouse are filling China with AP1000s at £3bn a pop, money that could have been coming into the UK and talent that could have been building for years rather than the hot air we've had from Government instead.

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

98 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
Smilers last line sums it up perfectly I believe, more envelopes [sic] in pockets.

greygoose

8,261 posts

195 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
paulrockliffe said:
The problem is that there are no grown ups on the horizon. I left school and spent a year at Sellafield before going University 16 years ago, they were working out where to put new nuclear build then, it had been urgently needed for a decade or two and something had to be done. Nothing has really happened since, we're 30 years past the point where this needed to start.

I've mentioned this before, but in 2000 we owned Westinghouse and could have done all this much simpler than now. Gordon Brown sold it off for pocket change to Hitachi. Westinghouse are filling China with AP1000s at £3bn a pop, money that could have been coming into the UK and talent that could have been building for years rather than the hot air we've had from Government instead.
Same as airport expansion, politicians are too scared of losing votes rather than taking big decisions for the future of the country, short-termism rules.

ALawson

7,815 posts

251 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
Has that board meeting finished yet?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jul/28/re...

Edited by ALawson on Thursday 28th July 16:17

Luther Blisset

391 posts

132 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
Smiler. said:
The other depressing thing said was along the lines of "too much face will be lost if it's not built, so it will be".

Political expediency operating at full steam then. Great.
I can't believe we're gonna be stuck with energy at the equivalent oil price of $300/bbl just to avoid a few egos getting bruised, given the impact that energy costs have on the rest of the economy.

Seems like madness that something so important can come down to personal issues.

For $25bn we could build a couple of large NG plants for security and and throw the rest at UK renewables to get the that industry going.

Or just write off the cost altogether (govt borrowing is pretty cheap right now) and not have an economic millstone around our necks for a generation.

Talksteer

4,866 posts

233 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
Luther Blisset said:
Smiler. said:
The other depressing thing said was along the lines of "too much face will be lost if it's not built, so it will be".

Political expediency operating at full steam then. Great.
I can't believe we're gonna be stuck with energy at the equivalent oil price of $300/bbl just to avoid a few egos getting bruised, given the impact that energy costs have on the rest of the economy.

Seems like madness that something so important can come down to personal issues.

For $25bn we could build a couple of large NG plants for security and and throw the rest at UK renewables to get the that industry going.

Or just write off the cost altogether (govt borrowing is pretty cheap right now) and not have an economic millstone around our necks for a generation.
In all likelihood Hinkley Point C will be built cheaper than the estimates. The strike price method very much encourages the utility to up their estimate and at the moment the cost is estimated higher than the plants in Finland and France which went wrong.

In the event that happens expect this to be wheeled out.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windfall_Tax_(Unit...

750turbo

6,164 posts

224 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
So it has been given the go-ahead, no surprises there then.

Now Theresa, tell whoever get on with HS2 and Runway 3 at Heathrow - No fking about, show them you mean business. wink

(In reality I know bugger all about any of these subjects, I am just pissed off with all the media reports of will they/wont they)




Edited by 750turbo on Thursday 28th July 22:10

mondeoman

11,430 posts

266 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
Bad, bad decision.

Not the fact that we're FINALLY building new nuclear base load, but the fact that we've chosen an unproven, expensive, over-priced white elephant. Retards in charge

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

224 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
louiebaby said:
Asked by Conservative MP James Heappey why it was “reasonable for us to assume it but not reasonable for you to just say it”, Mr de Rivaz responded: “I am very pleased to give you the privilege to make the assumption and to draw the right conclusion as you have done.”

Brilliant. They have been repeated on yesterday channel this week, and if anything are more true to life now than then.

hidetheelephants

24,357 posts

193 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
Smiler. said:
Why not just fast-track a gas turbine programme nationally to plug the gap until some grown-ups can get involved. I know that this means a re-establishment of home-grown talent but why not? It's not like the energy issue is going to disappear any time soon.

That said, I wouldn't trust any of the major construction players in the UK further than I could throw them. They all appear to be a bent as a 9-bob note.
We've built them before so there's no reason why we could not do so again, it just requires the political will; one of the points made by the talking heads on Today was that EDF have the knowhow(stop giggling at the back) to build nuclear power stations and that this will be a 24ct moneyspinner once they've got the hang of it(I said stop giggling!). It's true there's money to be made from churning out NPPs, but I suspect it's Hitachi and Westinghouse who are making the profits rather than EDF, if only because no-one other than us, the finns and the chinese have bought EPR as it's so bloody expensive compared to the competition.
Luther Blisset said:
I can't believe we're gonna be stuck with energy at the equivalent oil price of $300/bbl just to avoid a few egos getting bruised, given the impact that energy costs have on the rest of the economy.

Seems like madness that something so important can come down to personal issues.

For $25bn we could build a couple of large NG plants for security and and throw the rest at UK renewables to get the that industry going.

Or just write off the cost altogether (govt borrowing is pretty cheap right now) and not have an economic millstone around our necks for a generation.
The price is somewhat high, but rather better than your suggestion of renewables; offshore wind is around 50% more than the price EDF are guaranteed, and that's before you factor in the cost of intermittency and back-up power. The smarter thing would be to get the planned AP1000s or Hitachi BWRs moved up the schedule and ground broken now rather than in 5-10 years time.

750turbo

6,164 posts

224 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
WTF - Now under review by our Glorious Leader?

s2art

18,937 posts

253 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
750turbo said:
WTF - Now under review by our Glorious Leader?
Really? There is hope yet then.

alfie2244

11,292 posts

188 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
750turbo said:
WTF - Now under review by our Glorious Leader?
Brexit negotiating bargaining chip?

glazbagun

14,280 posts

197 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
alfie2244 said:
750turbo said:
WTF - Now under review by our Glorious Leader?
Brexit negotiating bargaining chip?
Was my first thought. And why not?

mondeoman

11,430 posts

266 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
750turbo said:
WTF - Now under review by our Glorious Leader?
linky?

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
alfie2244 said:
750turbo said:
WTF - Now under review by our Glorious Leader?
Brexit negotiating bargaining chip?
Oh yes a very smart move. We kept our powder dry they have exposure he only loser here could be EDF/Frog tax payer hmmm.

750turbo

6,164 posts

224 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
mondeoman said:
750turbo said:
WTF - Now under review by our Glorious Leader?
linky?
ITV News at Ten.

alfie2244

11,292 posts

188 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
alfie2244 said:
750turbo said:
WTF - Now under review by our Glorious Leader?
Brexit negotiating bargaining chip?
Was my first thought. And why not?
Hardball Brexit?

Cyder

7,053 posts

220 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
Jesus Christ I do wish this country would just grow a spine and bash on a build st rather than spend years fannying and pissing even more money up the wall. See Heathrow runway 3, HS2 and all new road network projects.

greygoose

8,261 posts

195 months

Thursday 28th July 2016
quotequote all
Cyder said:
Jesus Christ I do wish this country would just grow a spine and bash on a build st rather than spend years fannying and pissing even more money up the wall. See Heathrow runway 3, HS2 and all new road network projects.
Indeed, another review to waste some more time.