Living in the age of propaganda - your examples please
Discussion
We are living in an age of blatant propaganda - perhaps it was always so(?).
The UK is known in the world for two fairly biased and popular sites, the BBC (left) & Daily Mail (right).
Interesting how media is clickbait-infected in order to generate traffic.
You dont have to comment on the issue, just the warped or inaccurate portrayal.
My starter is this on the BBC:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35750868
Classic propaganda :
choose smiley face
headline earlier said "being thrown out for a jibe." (now changed)
Called declaring intending to kill a presidential candidate a "jibe".
Im my world that is horrendously biased and ugly painting of a situation.
edited to remove pictures
The UK is known in the world for two fairly biased and popular sites, the BBC (left) & Daily Mail (right).
Interesting how media is clickbait-infected in order to generate traffic.
You dont have to comment on the issue, just the warped or inaccurate portrayal.
My starter is this on the BBC:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35750868
Classic propaganda :
choose smiley face
headline earlier said "being thrown out for a jibe." (now changed)
Called declaring intending to kill a presidential candidate a "jibe".
Im my world that is horrendously biased and ugly painting of a situation.
edited to remove pictures
Edited by Hugh Jarse on Tuesday 8th March 13:46
Heres another from the beeb
Headline says "Europe hates Trump".
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35702584
Yet no empirical data presented to back up the claim, just some random quotes from people and publications that would be expected to dislike trump.
Quite an interesting article, but the headline is not just inaccurate, a plain lie.
edited to remove pictures
Headline says "Europe hates Trump".
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35702584
Yet no empirical data presented to back up the claim, just some random quotes from people and publications that would be expected to dislike trump.
Quite an interesting article, but the headline is not just inaccurate, a plain lie.
edited to remove pictures
Edited by Hugh Jarse on Tuesday 8th March 13:48
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a... - dozens of posts on PH where people make similar threats.
There are threats to kill and 'threats to kill'. The BBC article on the Egyptian bloke seems fine to me in picking up that and if your evidence that we live in 'the age of propaganda' is because they didn't use a panto-villanesq photo of him
The 'Europeans hate trump' article is clearly marked up as an editorial/magazine piece.
There are threats to kill and 'threats to kill'. The BBC article on the Egyptian bloke seems fine to me in picking up that and if your evidence that we live in 'the age of propaganda' is because they didn't use a panto-villanesq photo of him
The 'Europeans hate trump' article is clearly marked up as an editorial/magazine piece.
Seeing as the OP has surprisingly only managed to find BBC bias.
Not a headline and not strictly speaking a lie, although it craftily gives a misleading impression that the reason the criminal wasn't sent to prison was because of his mitigation plea, whereas in fact the judge specifically stated that he didn't accept it.
rpguk said:
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a... - dozens of posts on PH where people make similar threats.
There are threats to kill and 'threats to kill'. The BBC article on the Egyptian bloke seems fine to me in picking up that and if your evidence that we live in 'the age of propaganda' is because they didn't use a panto-villanesq photo of him
The 'Europeans hate trump' article is clearly marked up as an editorial/magazine piece.
Well given it is tax payer funded the statement "Europe hates Trump" should have "Opinion : Europe hates Trump" title as there are no empirical references.There are threats to kill and 'threats to kill'. The BBC article on the Egyptian bloke seems fine to me in picking up that and if your evidence that we live in 'the age of propaganda' is because they didn't use a panto-villanesq photo of him
The 'Europeans hate trump' article is clearly marked up as an editorial/magazine piece.
A threat to kill is not a jibe, saying his head "looks like a hay bale" is a jibe.
Again, I dont think its acceptable because the BBC is state funded, but glad to read the opposing argument.
Agree the Daily Mail is biased, but that is privately (offshore tax haven) owned so has less obligation to be balanced. The thread is supposed to be part entertaining, as you see things through other peoples eyes on how articles are interpreted.
Edited by Hugh Jarse on Tuesday 8th March 13:49
It's everywhere. Although a lot of people here seem to view the BBC as a lefty mouthpiece, to me it generally seems to pander to whoever is in power at the time.
I liked this from The Sun:
And here's a nice article from the Daily Mail on the plight of the 13000 refugee/migrants stuck at Idomeni whilst the EU struggles to formulate something resembling a plan to cope with the biggest humanitarian crisis to hit Europe since WWII. Or is it an article about how inhuman they are and how there can be no place for them in an enlightened society such as our own? I can't tell for some reason.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3481093/Bl...
And their nice objectve piece on "The Man who Hated Britain", who also happens to be the father of the Leader of the opposition and potential future PM:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2435751/Re...
I liked this from The Sun:
And here's a nice article from the Daily Mail on the plight of the 13000 refugee/migrants stuck at Idomeni whilst the EU struggles to formulate something resembling a plan to cope with the biggest humanitarian crisis to hit Europe since WWII. Or is it an article about how inhuman they are and how there can be no place for them in an enlightened society such as our own? I can't tell for some reason.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3481093/Bl...
And their nice objectve piece on "The Man who Hated Britain", who also happens to be the father of the Leader of the opposition and potential future PM:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2435751/Re...
Edited by glazbagun on Tuesday 8th March 14:15
scherzkeks said:
Most mainstream Western media outlets are owned by or have ties to one of six parent companies in the US. The more the media is consolidated, the greater the problem.
Not a very convincing argument in the UK. Outlets that don't fit your model include: Guardian, Daily Mail, Independent, BBC, Daily Express, Telegraph, Daily Star, Evening Standard, Mirror, Metro, Global Radio, Economist, Spectator. Obviously some of those are owned by the same company, but none of them are very American. The reports on EU, Brexit and the refugee crisis are very telling on which way a publication leans when essentially reporting on the same story.
I have a different perspective living in a small country in mainland Europe where there isn't much spin/opinion within news stories, just the facts. It was eye opening for me that the UK media display such disregard for their reader's intelligence and sway opinion by using click-bait headlines and only providing small pieces of the full picture, often bearing only slight relevance to the actual story.
I'll contribute some of the crazier propaganda headlines when I come across them
I have a different perspective living in a small country in mainland Europe where there isn't much spin/opinion within news stories, just the facts. It was eye opening for me that the UK media display such disregard for their reader's intelligence and sway opinion by using click-bait headlines and only providing small pieces of the full picture, often bearing only slight relevance to the actual story.
I'll contribute some of the crazier propaganda headlines when I come across them
Good stuff, those last two posts are why we need this thread.
Not to promote a viewpoint, just to hang shame on publications/organisations/"journalists" that are one eyed.
Media should report facts, where possible.
Im living in Sweden where the press decided not to report mass sexual assaults two years running.
That's a very wierd situation, not reporting things for whatever reason and it bothers me a lot more than mass sexual assaults (which bother me significantly).
Not to promote a viewpoint, just to hang shame on publications/organisations/"journalists" that are one eyed.
Media should report facts, where possible.
Im living in Sweden where the press decided not to report mass sexual assaults two years running.
That's a very wierd situation, not reporting things for whatever reason and it bothers me a lot more than mass sexual assaults (which bother me significantly).
Potatoes said:
The reports on EU, Brexit and the refugee crisis are very telling on which way a publication leans when essentially reporting on the same story.
I have a different perspective living in a small country in mainland Europe where there isn't much spin/opinion within news stories, just the facts.
Which country? I'm actually toying with moving to mainland Europe. The media is all-pervasive here and 80% of it pisses me right off. The EU ref seems, for instance, to be about if you prefer Boris to Cameron or whether you're comfortable sharing an opinion with Farage or Galloway than any objective in/out examination.I have a different perspective living in a small country in mainland Europe where there isn't much spin/opinion within news stories, just the facts.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff