Gorilla Shot Dead At Cincinnati Zoo After Child Falls Into E

Gorilla Shot Dead At Cincinnati Zoo After Child Falls Into E

Author
Discussion

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

124 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
The Mad Monk said:
PurpleTurtle said:
A life-affirming event,
What does that mean?
dictionary.cambridge.org said:
If you describe something as life-affirming, you mean that it makes you feel positive about life: Such a warm, life-affirming book![quote]

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english...

Ken Figenus

5,714 posts

118 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Definitely - no way Attenborough would have cuddled up to wild Baboons!

Sheets Tabuer

18,988 posts

216 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
5ohmustang said:
No i'd just say he is a dumb ass. Total innocence? Are you a liberal?

The parents should have been watching their kid, dumb asses. The zoo should review their enclosure, no spectator should be able to get in. Ultimately it was the child's bad decision making. He nearly failed in life and it would be prudent for him to learn from his mistakes.

Unfortunately since this story has gained so much attention more than Hiliaries failed presidential campaign, I am sure the family will be on every day time liberal douche bag talk show hosted by a bunch of butch dykes. Sympathy will be poured on the family and it will be somehow turned into another race issue. Somehow as they have done with everything else, they will jump on the band wagon and link the Gorilla, the child into some "lets all be ashamed to be white crap" "the animals in the zoos are slaves." People have lost their minds.

GorillasLivesMatters





Edited by 5ohmustang on Tuesday 31st May 07:02
Lol wut?

greygoose

8,269 posts

196 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Sheets Tabuer said:
5ohmustang said:
No i'd just say he is a dumb ass. Total innocence? Are you a liberal?

The parents should have been watching their kid, dumb asses. The zoo should review their enclosure, no spectator should be able to get in. Ultimately it was the child's bad decision making. He nearly failed in life and it would be prudent for him to learn from his mistakes.

Unfortunately since this story has gained so much attention more than Hiliaries failed presidential campaign, I am sure the family will be on every day time liberal douche bag talk show hosted by a bunch of butch dykes. Sympathy will be poured on the family and it will be somehow turned into another race issue. Somehow as they have done with everything else, they will jump on the band wagon and link the Gorilla, the child into some "lets all be ashamed to be white crap" "the animals in the zoos are slaves." People have lost their minds.

GorillasLivesMatters





Edited by 5ohmustang on Tuesday 31st May 07:02
Lol wut?
As he said People have lost their minds,certainly seems true from that post!

Rollin

6,097 posts

246 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Ken Figenus said:
bhstewie said:
What would you do if it was your child and you had a tranquiliser gun and a real gun to hand?
Hope to use one before the other. Yes of course he could have harmed the child but he didn't and he hadn't - that helps informs choice. If it was a Baboon/Lion etc I wouldn't be saying this, but it was a Gorilla. A dead one.
How much of this "non harm" are you happy for the child to take?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1--uIZf5uY

Halb

Original Poster:

53,012 posts

184 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
The chimp that ripped the face of the woman, there's issues when male chimps are around other adults, especially women.

A silverback gorilla and the kid is a different situation, from the video, the kid didn't took in danger.

The zoo have failed in most regards here, what happens from a governing point of view now?

Edited by Halb on Tuesday 31st May 20:56

nellyleelephant

2,705 posts

235 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Halb said:
from the video, the kid didn't took in danger.
Have you watched the video posted above your post? Can you honestly say that the kid didn't look in danger??

Sheets Tabuer

18,988 posts

216 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
There seems to be a consensus between zoo keepers that the right course of action was to shoot the animal yet the untrained public that have watched a youtube video and perhaps a Attenbourough DVD say different.

Halb

Original Poster:

53,012 posts

184 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
nellyleelephant said:
Have you watched the video posted above your post? Can you honestly say that the kid didn't look in danger??
I don't think I have watched all of it, but some.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
I have studied Chimps and there are clear signs of aggression and agitation in body language and sounds, which any qualified person could understand.

I think in this case the ape wasn't being aggressive, signs of distress but didn't deserve to die. They should have used distraction techniques first.

glazbagun

14,282 posts

198 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
I think this has suffered the same social media angst that happens whenever some white priviliged American goes off to shoot a Lion entrely legally.

The animal did nothing it wouldn't have been expected to (IE: it did nothing "wrong"), but on the basis of a cost/benefit analysis, the downside of overkill was miniscule compared to the downside of any less binary solution, so it was a no brainer.

But shooting a gorilla is seen in a low light by the same people who eat deathcamp pigs, chicken and cows every other day, because they think of them in some anthropomorphic way and they have a keyboard to hand.

The animal was dealt a st hand when the kid fell into its pen, no doubt, but worse things are happening every day with our governments (and by extension our) consent that few care ennough to post about.

vkcs22

196 posts

135 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Some comments are proper quality!

According to winesses the little nob wanted to get "in the water" and was arguing with his mum. When I first saw the video, I though that the parents were first class retarded thunder vaginas. Looks like I wasn't far off, as the father has a "lengthy criminal history". I don't really care about the gorilla as I didn't know him and I'm sure he wouldn't give a flying f*** about me either. What irritates me, is the stupid parents not disciplining their stupid spoilt kids, probably the same kind of people that let their kids run around and play football on the roads near where I live. I know some parents would risk their own life for their kids, didn't see daddy or mummy jumping to the rescue on this one! They must have though the gorilla was going to adopt the kid and pay for his private school. Stupid people shouldn't be allowed in zoos, shame they didn't shoot the parents too.

Loving all the Gorilla lives matter, 1 minute of silence for the great Harambe (who dedicated his life to helping the poor, fight injustice and donated to numerous charities) and the ones like "authorities should have put 15 feet concrete walls, electric fencing and armed guards" type of comments.

Halb

Original Poster:

53,012 posts

184 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
But shooting a gorilla is seen in a low light by the same people who eat deathcamp pigs, chicken and cows every other day, because they think of them in some anthropomorphic way and they have a keyboard to hand.
Anthropomorphic is sometimes a misapplied term. Once Humans were considered above the other animals, and any sort of 'bestowing' of 'human' traits onto the other animals was called anthropomorphising, Johnny Morris used to get told off for it. biggrin Mostly it came from religion. But as humans learn more about the other animals, especially the ones that are close in intelligence, it's clear that there are traits that are shared amongst certain animals, and are not exclusive to humans alone, quite a few animal societies are now recognised as cultures and anthropomorphising becomes less accurate with regards to some traits.

Edited by Halb on Tuesday 31st May 23:05

Jockman

17,917 posts

161 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
vkcs22 said:
Some comments are proper quality!

According to winesses the little nob wanted to get "in the water" and was arguing with his mum. When I first saw the video, I though that the parents were first class retarded thunder vaginas. Looks like I wasn't far off, as the father has a "lengthy criminal history". I don't really care about the gorilla as I didn't know him and I'm sure he wouldn't give a flying f*** about me either. What irritates me, is the stupid parents not disciplining their stupid spoilt kids, probably the same kind of people that let their kids run around and play football on the roads near where I live. I know some parents would risk their own life for their kids, didn't see daddy or mummy jumping to the rescue on this one! They must have though the gorilla was going to adopt the kid and pay for his private school. Stupid people shouldn't be allowed in zoos, shame they didn't shoot the parents too.

Loving all the Gorilla lives matter, 1 minute of silence for the great Harambe (who dedicated his life to helping the poor, fight injustice and donated to numerous charities) and the ones like "authorities should have put 15 feet concrete walls, electric fencing and armed guards" type of comments.
I think what annoys people most is that this was totally avoidable.

J4CKO

41,637 posts

201 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
They should have convicted Peados handy, in such a circumstance they get dressed in a sexy lady Gorilla costume and launched as a decoy.

Jockman

17,917 posts

161 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
rofl

dudleybloke

19,859 posts

187 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Where's Clarence Beaks when you need him?

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Ken Figenus said:
Staggeringly sad they didn't even try a tranquiliser - albeit with a rifle in the other hand to take swift action if this did actually cause him to start harming the child. The precedent is there that they can be quite approachable by fully grown men, so a child would pose less of a threat I guess. Looks a decision taken behind closed doors conceptually not one based on observing him. The 'what if' was greater than the 'what was'?



Edited by Ken Figenus on Tuesday 31st May 18:27
You know there was a human child at risk of death or serious Injury don't you. They had no option.

Things went bad they had a problem they had to resolve instantly.

Oakey

27,593 posts

217 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
He died almost ten years to the day, geez, has it been that long already

Jockman

17,917 posts

161 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
dudleybloke said:
Where's Clarence Beaks when you need him?
Google makes your comment so memorable.....