The economic consequences of Brexit
Poll: The economic consequences of Brexit
Total Members Polled: 732
Discussion
powerstroke said:
Yes without german cars our economy would grind to a halt , photocopyiers, unsold , middle managers on strike, kids not taken to school, joneses not kept up with, yes we would be screwed
Who will keep the outside lanes of our motorways clear without their led headlights flashing?We're all doomed!
jsf said:
jjlynn27 said:
Yes, you can almost see it, people will replace their Merc Bmw Audi and the rest with hmm Allard mk3.
Onwards and upwards, we are going to finance all that with export of FS to Brazil and Argentina.
A nice Aston Martin wouldn't go amiss on my drive.Onwards and upwards, we are going to finance all that with export of FS to Brazil and Argentina.
I've owned lots of different makes of car, current one is Japanese, Japanese spec too, goes like stink.
Ghibli said:
jsf said:
Are they all British owned ?Luckily the EU decided against the VW protetionist policy, so if you had the cash you could buy more the 50% of VW and decide to morve their global HQ to, say Corby. Or Melton Mowbray.
Someone aksed earlier about uk business buying overseas firms. Here is a comparison graph of total aquisitions, of and by uk companies
From the ONS. I wondef if its what you were expecting??
williamp said:
The problem with that question is that, unless they are wholly state owned, car companies are plc and therefore anyone can own them. So just as johnny foreigner can buy shares in a uk company and, if more then 50% have a controlling interest, johnny engliah can buy shares in bmw, vw, Mercedes, Fiat, PSA, toyota etc.
Luckily the EU decided against the VW protetionist policy, so if you had the cash you could buy more the 50% of VW and decide to morve their global HQ to, say Corby. Or Melton Mowbray.
Someone aksed earlier about uk business buying overseas firms. Here is a comparison graph of total aquisitions, of and by uk companies
From the ONS. I wondef if its what you were expecting??
Exactly, as the pound lowers in value. Foreign investors invest and we take back control and work for them.Luckily the EU decided against the VW protetionist policy, so if you had the cash you could buy more the 50% of VW and decide to morve their global HQ to, say Corby. Or Melton Mowbray.
Someone aksed earlier about uk business buying overseas firms. Here is a comparison graph of total aquisitions, of and by uk companies
From the ONS. I wondef if its what you were expecting??
Jockman said:
jsf said:
jjlynn27 said:
Yes, you can almost see it, people will replace their Merc Bmw Audi and the rest with hmm Allard mk3.
Onwards and upwards, we are going to finance all that with export of FS to Brazil and Argentina.
A nice Aston Martin wouldn't go amiss on my drive.Onwards and upwards, we are going to finance all that with export of FS to Brazil and Argentina.
I've owned lots of different makes of car, current one is Japanese, Japanese spec too, goes like stink.
jsf said:
Derek Smith said:
jsf said:
Derek Smith said:
jsf said:
Derek Smith said:
jsf said:
The UK will not have the Norwegian arrangement with the EU post Brexit.
The UK will have the UK arrangement with the EU post Brexit.
At this stage of the game no one can say what that will look like.
A wee bit contradictory. The UK will have the UK arrangement with the EU post Brexit.
At this stage of the game no one can say what that will look like.
I haven't checked their details, but I would assume that Lichenstein has not gone for Norway's demands for sole access to their seas. But it is still classified as the Norwegian option. I doubt it has the same degree of surplus energy to bargain with. But it is still classified as the Norwegian option. So their agreement is specific to Lichtenstein but still falls under the description of the Norwegian option.
Norway pays around Euro 100m per capita to the EU for membership. However, there are other charges as well and it is difficult to be specific as to the actual total. Our contributions will be up for negotiation for the UK. If we don't pay the same then our terms could still be classified as the Norwegian option.
So there is clearly a Norwegian option that the UK can use as a model for our relationship with the EU. It will certainly differ to that of Norway, for a number of reasons, but it can still be classified as the Norwegian option. There is the Swiss option, which is in some ways similar to the Norwegian option but different enough to have a classification all of its own. Our agreement is unlikely to follow that route according to many commentators but if it did it would not be identical but would still be classifiable as the Swiss option.
Using the various titles is both convenient and accurate. Further, from an EU perspective, it is useful to have an agreement with the UK which is basically the same as those already in existence. To allow us favourable terms would upset those already under agreement with the EU and to have poorer terms would upset the UK negotiators and would be politically difficult to justify.
So the use of the term Norwegian option is valid. Quite clearly so. You suggest the UK will have an agreement specific to the UK. The Norwegian option is specific to Lichtenstein in that it differs form that of Norway, but it is still the Norwegian option for the reason explained in my first paragraph.
If we opt for EEA, EFTA, free movement and full access to the EU, then that is the Norwegian option regardless of detail specific to us.
That is not, of course, to suggest that that will be the route we will negotiate, but it is a distinct possibility and the one favoured pre exit by business groups, including the CBI. However, some other groups are against it. Google "If you want to run the EU, stay in the EU. If you want to be run by the EU, feel free to join us in the EEA", a comment by someone from the Norwegian conservative type party.
So full access to the EU with free movement (EEA, EFTA) = Norwegian option.
In return the UK will continue to buy BMWs.
jsf said:
Jockman said:
jsf said:
jjlynn27 said:
Yes, you can almost see it, people will replace their Merc Bmw Audi and the rest with hmm Allard mk3.
Onwards and upwards, we are going to finance all that with export of FS to Brazil and Argentina.
A nice Aston Martin wouldn't go amiss on my drive.Onwards and upwards, we are going to finance all that with export of FS to Brazil and Argentina.
I've owned lots of different makes of car, current one is Japanese, Japanese spec too, goes like stink.
jsf said:
Jockman said:
jsf said:
jjlynn27 said:
Yes, you can almost see it, people will replace their Merc Bmw Audi and the rest with hmm Allard mk3.
Onwards and upwards, we are going to finance all that with export of FS to Brazil and Argentina.
A nice Aston Martin wouldn't go amiss on my drive.Onwards and upwards, we are going to finance all that with export of FS to Brazil and Argentina.
I've owned lots of different makes of car, current one is Japanese, Japanese spec too, goes like stink.
In the second hand case, the tariffs are neutralised by the good value it represents, and a GTR is cheap compared to its peers anyway and a bit of a niche choice that doesn't apply to a Qashqai.
The issue of tariffs is more of a problem for the location of factories. It could well influence Nissan and JLR future decision.
There is also the issue that many German cars are price sensitive - otherwise the roads would not be littered with 318/320ds. Price does matter alot.
If there are tariffs there is scope for JLR to sweep up in the UK with its XF20d - right up to the point where they decide they've lost too many EU sales and will make more money if the factory relocates to within the EU.
All assuming tariffs apply of course. Tariff free true barrier free SM access, there should be no issue.....at least for manufacturers.
rpguk said:
We had meeting with distributor last week, pretty much everything is 10% to 15% up. RSA 18%. rpguk said:
So now's the time to buy I suppose. I was going to upgrade my desktop in the near future. Ironically, I've just had a royalty cheque in USD.Brazilian kidnappers want ransom in Stirling these days.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/26/bernie-...
Definitely good news for brexiters.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/26/bernie-...
Definitely good news for brexiters.
el stovey said:
Brazilian kidnappers want ransom in Stirling these days.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/26/bernie-...
Definitely good news for brexiters.
Why Stirling (sic)?http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/26/bernie-...
Definitely good news for brexiters.
el stovey said:
Brazilian kidnappers want ransom in Sterling these days.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/26/bernie-...
Definitely good news for brexiters.
I'd want it in USD.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/26/bernie-...
Definitely good news for brexiters.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff