Farage stands down as UKIP leader
Discussion
Proto-fascist dictator 
given its origins that translates as not a dripping wet taxmad pseudo liberal nannyist spendaholic.
Here's half-hoping that Trump doesn't get elected as potus later this year, there may not be enough blood in the NHS to cope with the Guardianista popped blood vessels, and I would never wish harm on anyone even Juncker.
Not that there are so many Guardianistas, it's the simultaneous popping that would be a challenge for blood banks.
The other half-hope is that he is elected, for all the expected reasons unrelated to health.
given its origins that translates as not a dripping wet taxmad pseudo liberal nannyist spendaholic.Here's half-hoping that Trump doesn't get elected as potus later this year, there may not be enough blood in the NHS to cope with the Guardianista popped blood vessels, and I would never wish harm on anyone even Juncker.
Not that there are so many Guardianistas, it's the simultaneous popping that would be a challenge for blood banks.
The other half-hope is that he is elected, for all the expected reasons unrelated to health.
Countdown said:
s2art said:
Countdown said:
Is Trump still an elected MEP? As in "getting paid to be an MEP rather than stumping for Trump"?
Trump is not an MEP.
Edited by Sylvaforever on Sunday 28th August 17:15
The quote is from a satirical magazine, Schulz never said anything of the sort.
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34433/...
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34433/...
Thorodin said:
Sorry Derek, unacceptable. I still await to read a creditworthy quote where he specifically says, or even hints, that he would intend to spend that money on the NHS. Or are we still under the rules governing allegations of sexual assault where to accuse proves guilt? It just won't do I'm afraid to put words one would have liked him to have said in his mouth. After all, he has hardly been hiding when speaking has he? Every syllable he utters is scribbled down for posterity - just as well isn't it?
Maybe you'd like to apply your own standards to quotes reinforcing your thoughts?cookie118 said:
The quote is from a satirical magazine, Schulz never said anything of the sort.
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34433/...
This seems a theme of the campaign. Make up any old nonsense to demonise the EU and it gets lapped up without question.http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34433/...
What is unfortunate are what I increasingly feel are the real motives behind the likes of Farage and others when they do this. A lot of it is clearly about "foreigners".
te in the UK? cookie118 said:
The quote is from a satirical magazine, Schulz never said anything of the sort.
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34433/...
The so-called quote attributed to Schultz was published all over the place. http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34433/...
It was rather obvious he wouldn't be 'that' blunt! He's not a fool.
However, he 'did' state these few sentences on hearing the ref. result.
'For 40 yrs UK relation with EU was ambiguous.'
'Now it's clear. Will of voters must be respected. Now need speedy & clear exit negotiation.'
Ambiguous? - was it, why did he not mention this prior to the vote?
It just proves how totally pissed off he was with the result. Just like Remanians here.
However, I do agree with him on his last three sentences ...totally.
How about you remoaners...
I do hope that you all agree with him? (don't be shy!)
s2art said:
///ajd said:
What is unfortunate are what I increasingly feel are the real motives behind the likes of Farage and others when they do this. A lot of it is clearly about "foreigners".
Farage married a 'foreigner'. So what do you think his motives are?
cookie118 said:
The quote is from a satirical magazine, Schulz never said anything of the sort.
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34433/...
I'd be happy to if you would tell me where I have misreported what any individual has said. My post concerning Farage was to do with the false attribution to him of invented words on the NHS. The poster I was addressing has not yet responded, unlike him, and I await his reply with interest as he has always kindly done so in the past. Not unreasonable? HTH http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34433/...
Thorodin said:
Sorry Derek, unacceptable. I still await to read a creditworthy quote where he specifically says, or even hints, that he would intend to spend that money on the NHS. Or are we still under the rules governing allegations of sexual assault where to accuse proves guilt? It just won't do I'm afraid to put words one would have liked him to have said in his mouth. After all, he has hardly been hiding when speaking has he? Every syllable he utters is scribbled down for posterity - just as well isn't it?
Maybe you'd like to apply your own standards to quotes reinforcing your thoughts?Countdown said:
s2art said:
///ajd said:
What is unfortunate are what I increasingly feel are the real motives behind the likes of Farage and others when they do this. A lot of it is clearly about "foreigners".
Farage married a 'foreigner'. So what do you think his motives are?
Art0ir said:
Countdown said:
s2art said:
///ajd said:
What is unfortunate are what I increasingly feel are the real motives behind the likes of Farage and others when they do this. A lot of it is clearly about "foreigners".
Farage married a 'foreigner'. So what do you think his motives are?s2art said:
///ajd said:
What is unfortunate are what I increasingly feel are the real motives behind the likes of Farage and others when they do this. A lot of it is clearly about "foreigners".
Farage married a 'foreigner'. So what do you think his motives are?He's been banging on about the wrong kind of foreigners for years. You will have seen his arguably racist posters.
He's learned (well) how to dress up his racism in a way that doesn't seem unacceptable and has found a way to give it alarming broader appeal.
This has been a barely suppressed streak in UKIP for a long time - remember Bloom hitting that reporter with his UKIP brochure as it only had white faces on it?
Countdown said:
s2art said:
///ajd said:
What is unfortunate are what I increasingly feel are the real motives behind the likes of Farage and others when they do this. A lot of it is clearly about "foreigners".
Farage married a 'foreigner'. So what do you think his motives are?zygalski said:
Countdown said:
s2art said:
///ajd said:
What is unfortunate are what I increasingly feel are the real motives behind the likes of Farage and others when they do this. A lot of it is clearly about "foreigners".
Farage married a 'foreigner'. So what do you think his motives are?
petard disposal squad to report asapArt0ir said:
Countdown said:
s2art said:
///ajd said:
What is unfortunate are what I increasingly feel are the real motives behind the likes of Farage and others when they do this. A lot of it is clearly about "foreigners".
Farage married a 'foreigner'. So what do you think his motives are?zygalski said:
No, it was to get a competent German worker to be his secretary as there were no suitable Brits for the role.
She must be exceptionally competent. When the dastardly EU stopped MEPs from employing family members she was fortunate enough to get a job with...... another UKIP MEP! What are the odds??Snout, meet trough.....
///ajd said:
cookie118 said:
The quote is from a satirical magazine, Schulz never said anything of the sort.
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34433/...
This seems a theme of the campaign. Make up any old nonsense to demonise the EU and it gets lapped up without question.http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/34433/...
What is unfortunate are what I increasingly feel are the real motives behind the likes of Farage and others when they do this. A lot of it is clearly about "foreigners".
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff