Could or should the city be sacrificed for good brexit deal??

[powerstroke]

kurt535 said:

thats because majority of teenagers attending the building construction course at college are normally identified as challenging kids so easier to offload them to a local FE or private trg provider. most are poor from the outset and by the time they leave school at 16 don't apply to college full time cos they have been there for 2 years already. painting decorating course is a classic course at an FE 'rammed with 90% tts' - not my words but those of two mature blokes who paid to go to college and get their L2 PD this year who just painted my house.

This is so wrong isn't it ?? in a way its good they are trying to help the less fortunate but it should
be put forward as a worthwhile career choice not a last chance saloon ....

[powerstroke]

///ajd said:

powerstroke said:

For the good of the majority ??? further to May's speech saying she will govern for the little man ...
should our deals on trade in goods , fishing , cars and agricultural produce etc that benefits the wider economy be done even if they have to give concessions maybe against the best interests of the city of london and the financial sector?? something that makes a lot of money for a privileged few and pays some tax ,
is it a perfect opportunity to re balance our economy ...

ah, a blast from the past!

daily mash should just run it as is.

bankers into fishermen

poetry.

Awww Bless , looks like you were wrong and I might have been pessimistic , but there is time yet we haven't left the EUSSR
yet, you and tossers like Osbourn who predicted doom from the second the referendum result was announced Wrong , wrong and incorrect oh well , keep up running the UK down my 3rd rate quisling friend ... we love remoaner Bile ....
Brexit rocks , love Europe hate the EU