Iplayer to need TV licence from 1/9/2016 - full fee required

Iplayer to need TV licence from 1/9/2016 - full fee required

Author
Discussion

Welshbeef

Original Poster:

49,633 posts

198 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
All this noise for he sake that it's £12/PCM.

Put it into general taxation instead and lower the starting point of income tax so we all pay for it job done. Or if £12/PCM is so much for you get rid of the smart phone and your car too as you clearly cannot afford it.

Cotty

39,537 posts

284 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
All this noise for he sake that it's £12/PCM.

Put it into general taxation instead and lower the starting point of income tax so we all pay for it job done. Or if £12/PCM is so much for you get rid of the smart phone and your car too as you clearly cannot afford it.
Its not about the money. If I don't watch TV I don't need to pay, regardless of the amount. But also I don't wish to receive threatening letters demanding I prove my innocence and innocence it is as I don't watch TV.

This is the bit you are not grasping. If people don't watch TV they don't need to pay for a licence.

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
All this noise for he sake that it's £12/PCM.

Put it into general taxation instead and lower the starting point of income tax so we all pay for it job done. Or if £12/PCM is so much for you get rid of the smart phone and your car too as you clearly cannot afford it.
The reason why it is not included in general taxation is that the licence fee is NOT paid directly to a government department (such as HMRC). This, supposedly, gives the BBC independent control from government.

Of course, in reality, that independence is often compromised.

amusingduck

9,396 posts

136 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
All this noise for he sake that it's £12/PCM.

Put it into general taxation instead and lower the starting point of income tax so we all pay for it job done. Or if £12/PCM is so much for you get rid of the smart phone and your car too as you clearly cannot afford it.
If you're OK with people paying tax they're not required to, are you also OK with people claiming tax relief they're not entitled to? smile

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

228 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
All this noise for he sake that it's £12/PCM.

Put it into general taxation instead and lower the starting point of income tax so we all pay for it job done. Or if £12/PCM is so much for you get rid of the smart phone and your car too as you clearly cannot afford it.
And we're off again. The old 'it's only £12 a month' nonsense. hehe

How about you give me £12 a month. You won't get anything in return, but just give me the money. Let's say you need to because you post on PH. Even if you don't post on PH, you still need to give me the money. Ok?

chris watton

22,477 posts

260 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
funkyrobot said:
Welshbeef said:
All this noise for he sake that it's £12/PCM.

Put it into general taxation instead and lower the starting point of income tax so we all pay for it job done. Or if £12/PCM is so much for you get rid of the smart phone and your car too as you clearly cannot afford it.
And we're off again. The old 'it's only £12 a month' nonsense. hehe

How about you give me £12 a month. You won't get anything in return, but just give me the money. Let's say you need to because you post on PH. Even if you don't post on PH, you still need to give me the money. Ok?
I think Welshbeef has admitted that he does work for the BBC, which perhaps explains a lot...

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
He's just trolling at this point. I think he has that on copy paste.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

228 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
chris watton said:
I think Welshbeef has admitted that he does work for the BBC, which perhaps explains a lot...
Has he?

Cool. smokin

He can use licence payer's money to finally get that Porsche.

TheInternet

4,716 posts

163 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
chris watton said:
I think Welshbeef has admitted that he does work for the BBC

technodup

7,580 posts

130 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
It's odd you say that as nearly all other countries have a TV licence set up (similar cost if not more) without any BBC equivalent radio and TV programmes.
I couldn't give a fk what other countries do.

What I've yet to hear an acceptable answer to is - if I want to watch say ITV, C4 or Discovery, why do I have to pay the BBC first?





AJL308

6,390 posts

156 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
amusingduck said:
AJL308 said:
This was mentioned a while back and I'm not sure it's correct. The argument went that you could watch without a licence whilst powering the device with its battery but if you plugged it in to charge and continued watching then you need to be licensed.

The wording in the Act (from memory) is "..powered by an internal battery...". Well, surely if you have the phone/laptop plugged in it's still powered by its internal battery and not the mains? The mains is just charging the battery but the battery is still powering the device.
A laptop will still run on mains power if you remove the battery
Then that would be where the offence is.

If the battery is in and charging then it's still being "powered" its battery, surely?

amusingduck

9,396 posts

136 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
AJL308 said:
Then that would be where the offence is.

If the battery is in and charging then it's still being "powered" its battery, surely?
I think you misunderstood.

If you remove the laptop's battery, and plug the power adaptor into the laptop, it will still work.

AJL308

6,390 posts

156 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
amusingduck said:
AJL308 said:
Then that would be where the offence is.

If the battery is in and charging then it's still being "powered" its battery, surely?
I think you misunderstood.

If you remove the laptop's battery, and plug the power adaptor into the laptop, it will still work.
No, I did understand.

Yes, if you do that then you need a licence because it is not powered by an internal battery. It's mains operated.

The point that was made originally was that if you are watching Iplayer on a laptop which is unplugged and running from its battery and then plug it in to charge when you get a low battery warning then at that point you commit the offence of having no licence. That was the advice given somewhere.

I'm saying that that advice is wrong because even though it's plugged in it isn't running from the mains. It's running from its battery which is being charged by the mains. The mains isn't powering the device, the battery is.

If you remove the battery and plug it in then it is running directly from the mains and so you need a licence.

Edit: to redo the final sentence 'cos I'm a muppet.

Edited by AJL308 on Thursday 29th September 17:40


Edited by AJL308 on Thursday 29th September 17:41

amusingduck

9,396 posts

136 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
AJL308 said:
No, I did understand.

Yes, if you do that then you need a licence because it is not powered by an internal battery. It's mains operated.

The point that was made originally was that if you are watching Iplayer on a laptop which is unplugged and running from its battery and then plug it in to charge when you get a low battery warning then at that point you commit the offence of having no licence. That was the advice given somewhere.

I'm saying that that advice is wrong because even though it's plugged in it isn't running from the mains. It's running from its battery which is being charged by the mains. The mains isn't powering the device, the battery is.

If you remove the battery and plug it in then it is not running directly from the mains and so you need a licence.
Apologies, it was me who misunderstood.

I see where you're coming from. I agree with your logic.

eldar

21,740 posts

196 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
amusingduck said:
Apologies, it was me who misunderstood.

I see where you're coming from. I agree with your logic.
It illustrates the pointless complexity of the licence, struggling with it's 1930's technology base and the 'unique way the BBC is funded.'

Edinburger

10,403 posts

168 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
You lot are unbelievable. All that say £12 per month?!

It annoys me that my taxes pay for things I don't use but hey-ho.


amusingduck

9,396 posts

136 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
Edinburger said:
You lot are unbelievable. All that say £12 per month?!

It annoys me that my taxes pay for things I don't use but hey-ho.
If you woke up tomorrow and decided you were no longer interested in consuming live TV, on-demand BBC content, etc, would you continue paying for a TV licence?

Cotty

39,537 posts

284 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
amusingduck said:
If you woke up tomorrow and decided you were no longer interested in consuming live TV, on-demand BBC content, etc, would you continue paying for a TV licence?
Bet you won't get an answer to that,

eldar

21,740 posts

196 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
amusingduck said:
If you woke up tomorrow and decided you were no longer interested in consuming live TV, on-demand BBC content, etc, would you continue paying for a TV licence?
You mean that if you didn't need a licence would you still buy one?

kennydies

198 posts

118 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
or pay for insurance on a car you no longer own because it is cheap.