The Gender Unicorn
Discussion
mph1977 said:
WinstonWolf said:
mph1977 said:
Nanook said:
You're nitpicking, and avoiding the question of why people should be tolerant and respectful of your gender, but not those of other people that you don't recognise. When I wrote sex/gender you know fine well what I meant.
Address the point please?
and we are back to the insulting abusive use of slurs should be respected by those being abused becasue the abuser is 'normal' and the victim is a 'freak '.Address the point please?
That's a good one!Your words 'prove' sweet FA, except (as the OP pointed out) that's all you have done, just used some 'words' - but together they form a nonsensical mess!
Mind you, it does illustrate one point: you require some immediate and basic lessons in grammar!
dandarez said:
mph1977 said:
WinstonWolf said:
mph1977 said:
Nanook said:
You're nitpicking, and avoiding the question of why people should be tolerant and respectful of your gender, but not those of other people that you don't recognise. When I wrote sex/gender you know fine well what I meant.
Address the point please?
and we are back to the insulting abusive use of slurs should be respected by those being abused becasue the abuser is 'normal' and the victim is a 'freak '.Address the point please?
That's a good one!Your words 'prove' sweet FA, except (as the OP pointed out) that's all you have done, just used some 'words' - but together they form a nonsensical mess!
Mind you, it does illustrate one point: you require some immediate and basic lessons in grammar!
mph1977 said:
dandarez said:
mph1977 said:
WinstonWolf said:
mph1977 said:
Nanook said:
You're nitpicking, and avoiding the question of why people should be tolerant and respectful of your gender, but not those of other people that you don't recognise. When I wrote sex/gender you know fine well what I meant.
Address the point please?
and we are back to the insulting abusive use of slurs should be respected by those being abused becasue the abuser is 'normal' and the victim is a 'freak '.Address the point please?
That's a good one!Your words 'prove' sweet FA, except (as the OP pointed out) that's all you have done, just used some 'words' - but together they form a nonsensical mess!
Mind you, it does illustrate one point: you require some immediate and basic lessons in grammar!
Now *that* is how you do Q.E.D.
DELETED: Comment made by a member who's account has been deleted.
I think you need to read the thread the use of loaded language by those defending bigotry is common in addition to the use of bigoted language and slur words by a number of posters. It is unsuprising that the 'normals' cannot recognise their privelege and that their definitiosn of normal and slurring of others is slurring ...
mph1977 said:
recognise their privelege
What is that even supposed to mean? 99% of people can have sensible discussion about these types of topics. The remaining are either too ignorant or intellectual fascists.
At least the ignorant can educated, cultists on the "progressive left" however are beyond saving I think.
Art0ir said:
mph1977 said:
recognise their privelege
What is that even supposed to mean? 99% of people can have sensible discussion about these types of topics. The remaining are either too ignorant or intellectual fascists.
At least the ignorant can educated, cultists on the "progressive left" however are beyond saving I think.
Nanook said:
You don't 'do' questions, do you?
You just do 'indignant faux outrage'
There have been a few questions aimed at you on this page, regarding what your posts are supposed to convey, and a couple from me about the post of mine you quoted and replied to.
Maybe you could calm down a bit and address the points raised? That'd be nice, if you'd be so kind?
This is not indignant faux outrage, this is actual outrage at the amopunt of insults and use of slur words towards me by posters in this thread. You just do 'indignant faux outrage'
There have been a few questions aimed at you on this page, regarding what your posts are supposed to convey, and a couple from me about the post of mine you quoted and replied to.
Maybe you could calm down a bit and address the points raised? That'd be nice, if you'd be so kind?
it is abundantly clear that there are posters on this thread, who have no interest in informing themselves aobut the issue and instead which to impose their hetero-normative and cis-normative view of what is correct without regard to the science or clinical facts.
DELETED: Comment made by a member who's account has been deleted.
Just demonstrating your ignorance there ... standard PH tactics when LGBT topics come up ,
1.call anyone who isn't a 'powerfully built' cisgender heterosexual 'abnormal' and therefore they are 'normal'
2. call anyone who doesn't agree with 'normals' a Social justice warrior, even if they are part of the community being slurred
3. use slur words and terms as well as heavily loaded language against the LGBT community
4. claim to be 'insulted' and 'oppressed' by the use of correct terms for the 'normals' ( i.e. cisgender and heterosexual)
5. Suggest mental illness in anyone who disagrees with the 'normals'
all in all the standard bullying tactics of a privileged group .
mph1977 said:
Nanook said:
Towards you? Sorry, I've missed that, who has used slur words towards you, and when?
Thanks.
Just demonstrating your ignorance there ... Thanks.
standard PH tactics when LGBT topics come up ,
1.call anyone who isn't a 'powerfully built' cisgender heterosexual 'abnormal' and therefore they are 'normal'
2. call anyone who doesn't agree with 'normals' a Social justice warrior, even if they are part of the community being slurred
3. use slur words and terms as well as heavily loaded language against the LGBT community
4. claim to be 'insulted' and 'oppressed' by the use of correct terms for the 'normals' ( i.e. cisgender and heterosexual)
5. Suggest mental illness in anyone who disagrees with the 'normals'
all in all the standard bullying tactics of a privileged group .
WinstonWolf said:
mph1977 said:
Nanook said:
Towards you? Sorry, I've missed that, who has used slur words towards you, and when?
Thanks.
Just demonstrating your ignorance there ... Thanks.
standard PH tactics when LGBT topics come up ,
1.call anyone who isn't a 'powerfully built' cisgender heterosexual 'abnormal' and therefore they are 'normal'
2. call anyone who doesn't agree with 'normals' a Social justice warrior, even if they are part of the community being slurred
3. use slur words and terms as well as heavily loaded language against the LGBT community
4. claim to be 'insulted' and 'oppressed' by the use of correct terms for the 'normals' ( i.e. cisgender and heterosexual)
5. Suggest mental illness in anyone who disagrees with the 'normals'
all in all the standard bullying tactics of a privileged group .
mph1977 said:
WinstonWolf said:
mph1977 said:
Nanook said:
Towards you? Sorry, I've missed that, who has used slur words towards you, and when?
Thanks.
Just demonstrating your ignorance there ... Thanks.
standard PH tactics when LGBT topics come up ,
1.call anyone who isn't a 'powerfully built' cisgender heterosexual 'abnormal' and therefore they are 'normal'
2. call anyone who doesn't agree with 'normals' a Social justice warrior, even if they are part of the community being slurred
3. use slur words and terms as well as heavily loaded language against the LGBT community
4. claim to be 'insulted' and 'oppressed' by the use of correct terms for the 'normals' ( i.e. cisgender and heterosexual)
5. Suggest mental illness in anyone who disagrees with the 'normals'
all in all the standard bullying tactics of a privileged group .
Are you now claiming to be disadvantaged?
mph1977 said:
This is not indignant faux outrage, this is actual outrage at the amopunt of insults and use of slur words towards me by posters in this thread.
it is abundantly clear that there are posters on this thread, who have no interest in informing themselves aobut the issue and instead which to impose their hetero-normative and cis-normative view of what is correct without regard to the science or clinical facts.
Unfortunately, you seem to be the type of person who steers people off of the very subject you're a self proclaimed expert in. You throw around words that help isolate others from the subject, you fail to explain things, and you seem perpetually offended.it is abundantly clear that there are posters on this thread, who have no interest in informing themselves aobut the issue and instead which to impose their hetero-normative and cis-normative view of what is correct without regard to the science or clinical facts.
Over all, you come across as a bit preachy, patronising and angry.
mph1977 said:
WinstonWolf said:
It was a question not a statement.
Are you now claiming to be disadvantaged?
so, you are saying you are a denialist for organisational discrimination ?Are you now claiming to be disadvantaged?
Slow down a little, think before you post. You're doing far more harm than good.
WinstonWolf said:
mph1977 said:
WinstonWolf said:
It was a question not a statement.
Are you now claiming to be disadvantaged?
so, you are saying you are a denialist for organisational discrimination ?Are you now claiming to be disadvantaged?
Slow down a little, think before you post. You're doing far more harm than good.
you are upset because someone is challenging your world view and either you are so lacking in insight you can only percieve it as as an insult , alternatively you have a glimmer of insight but you ego overrides ...
mph1977 said:
WinstonWolf said:
mph1977 said:
WinstonWolf said:
It was a question not a statement.
Are you now claiming to be disadvantaged?
so, you are saying you are a denialist for organisational discrimination ?Are you now claiming to be disadvantaged?
Slow down a little, think before you post. You're doing far more harm than good.
you are upset because someone is challenging your world view and either you are so lacking in insight you can only percieve it as as an insult , alternatively you have a glimmer of insight but you ego overrides ...
voyds9 said:
mph1977 said:
4. claim to be 'insulted' and 'oppressed' by the use of correct terms for the 'normals' ( i.e. cisgender and heterosexual)
How dare you define what I should be termed.Normal has been my groups nomenclature for centuries, leave it that way.
amazing how people are so quick to prove their bigotry when it comes to asserting their virility ...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff