Hillsborough - wasnt the inquiry enough?

[Bradgate]

Absolutely not.

The senior police officers who were responsible for the deaths of 96 innocent people, and then tried to cover up their actions, should be prosecuted for manslaughter and conspiracy to pervert the cause of justice.

Only then will there be justice for the 96.

[johnxjsc1985]

The Police have for over 27 years done everything they could to prevent the truth coming out. Deaths could have and should have been prevented by a competent Police Force. Even during the Inquiry they continued to be evasive and aggressive towards the witnesses. Now the CPS will decide if prosecution is the way forward.
If anyone thinks that the families of 96 Victims are now just getting on with their lives and forgetting what happened on the day and in the DECADES since think again.

[p1esk]

The Mad Monk said:

hepy said:

saaby93 said:

Did anyone else think the Hillsborough inquiry had run its course and brought closure to everyone involved

It seems not
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshi...
Another chance to rake everything up again and spend years taking through the courts?
Isnt there a time when a line is drawn and wasnt that at the inquiry end?

The police lied and cheated, falsifying evidence and you think this should go unpunished. Or is it because the crime happened back in 1989?

A serious crime has been committed and public trust in the police (not just South Yorkshire) been eroded.

Of course there should be prosecutions.

What the police did was after the event. Whatever they did or didn't do, they didn't kill anybody.

Who crushed the fans that died?

Other fans.

[anonymous-user]

deja vu all over again

[Jockman]

desolate said:

deja vu all over again

What was that film where Bill Murray kept reliving the same day...?

[Bradgate]

p1esk said:

Other fans.

Let it go, Kelvin. No-one is listening any more.

[BJG1]

saaby93 said:

Why is there a criminal case?

Erm, just a wild stab in the dark here but I reckon it might be because crimes were committed

[Alucidnation]

Jockman said:

desolate said:

deja vu all over again

What was that film where Bill Murray kept reliving the same day...?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107048/

[p1esk]

Bradgate said:

p1esk said:

Other fans.

Let it go, Kelvin. No-one is listening any more.

I wuz just answering the question, Fred.

[johnxjsc1985]

p1esk said:

I wuz just answering the question, Fred.

must be your Yorkshire sense of humour

[p1esk]

johnxjsc1985 said:

p1esk said:

I wuz just answering the question, Fred.

must be your Yorkshire sense of humour

Not really. I have never seen it as a suitable subject for humour, whether Yorkshire or any other kind.

[johnxjsc1985]

p1esk said:

Not really. I have never seen it as a suitable subject for humour, whether Yorkshire or any other kind.

nor a subject for flippant remarks.

[p1esk]

johnxjsc1985 said:

p1esk said:

Not really. I have never seen it as a suitable subject for humour, whether Yorkshire or any other kind.

nor a subject for flippant remarks.

Agreed, which is why I didn't make any.

[anonymous-user]

p1esk said:

Agreed, which is why I didn't make any.

yeah right.

[p1esk]

desolate said:

p1esk said:

Agreed, which is why I didn't make any.

yeah right.

Oh, hello, Stephen. Just back from Sainsburys are you? No holding hands, I trust. You never know who might be offended.

[anonymous-user]

p1esk said:

Oh, hello, Stephen. Just back from Sainsburys are you? No holding hands, I trust. You never know who might be offended.

your point?

[p1esk]

desolate said:

p1esk said:

Oh, hello, Stephen. Just back from Sainsburys are you? No holding hands, I trust. You never know who might be offended.

your point?

None really, beyond greeting you and recalling that we're 'met' before, and had differing approaches to things.

[anonymous-user]

p1esk said:

None really, beyond greeting you and recalling that we're 'met' before, and had differing approaches to things.

Ok, just being flippant then?

[p1esk]

desolate said:

p1esk said:

None really, beyond greeting you and recalling that we're 'met' before, and had differing approaches to things.

Ok, just being flippant then?

Well I didn't think so, but it appears you do: but then we can't be expected to agree all the time.