Bridge collapse on M20

Author
Discussion

SilverSpur

20,911 posts

248 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
alfie2244 said:
SilverSpur said:
Using a 'measuring stick' isn't accurate enough when trying to see if a load height is either 16'5" or 16'6" is it? Its not a scientific method of measuring something to that level of accuracy.
This is PH, haven't we got any mad scientists, people with the ear of Chris Grayling and the contact details of dragons Den somewhere on here? wink
Of course it would be fine for getting a 'rough' measurement, but if it's within 1 or 2% of total allowable height I'd suggest it isn't accurate enough....

cahami

1,248 posts

207 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
Does anyone on here have first hand experience using these machines? Can it be of any use with the bucket that way round or was it just fitted like that to transport because the bucket was laying that way. Also can the bucket curl under as it were when mounted that way?

Digga

40,349 posts

284 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
cahami said:
Does anyone on here have first hand experience using these machines? Can it be of any use with the bucket that way round or was it just fitted like that to transport because the bucket was laying that way. Also can the bucket curl under as it were when mounted that way?
Yes, yes and yes.

On the former, I'm qualified up to 30 tonnes operating weight.

On the latter, it is of limited use and minimised breakout force (the ram's pulling not pushing) but sometimes useful, for example in confined spaces, or if you want to dig a square lower corner to the far wall of a trench.

alfie2244

11,292 posts

189 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
Digga said:
cahami said:
Does anyone on here have first hand experience using these machines? Can it be of any use with the bucket that way round or was it just fitted like that to transport because the bucket was laying that way. Also can the bucket curl under as it were when mounted that way?
Yes, yes and yes.

On the former, I'm qualified up to 30 tonnes operating weight.

On the latter, it is of limited use and minimised breakout force (the ram's pulling not pushing) but sometimes useful, for example in confined spaces, or if you want to dig a square lower corner to the far wall of a trench.
All correct except it's a ditching bucket biggrin

s p a c e m a n

10,781 posts

149 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
Slightly off topic but seeing as there's a few truckers here, there's no consolidated database of bridge heights/weight limits is there? Annoys me that in 2016 I have to spend a minimum 20 minutes browsing google streetview before I go somewhere that I dont know with an abnormal load.

As for bridges there's one up the A12 Colchesterish that I always duck with when approaching with a high load, it's lower than all the others and I still don't know exactly what the gap is. It might not even be low, it's just noticeably lower than all the others and makes me hold my breath hehe

SilverSpur

20,911 posts

248 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
If the bucket was a fitted the 'normal' way around the arm would be lower. Correct? Appears to be logical to me.

alfie2244

11,292 posts

189 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
SilverSpur said:
If the bucket was a fitted the 'normal' way around the arm would be lower. Correct? Appears to be logical to me.
Yes it could have been lower.

greygoose

8,269 posts

196 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
Motorway to be shut this weekend to take down the other half of the bridge apparently.

227bhp

10,203 posts

129 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
SilverSpur said:
Using a 'measuring stick' isn't accurate enough when trying to see if a load height is either 16'5" or 16'6" is it? Its not a scientific method of measuring something to that level of accuracy.

The highest point of a load will not have a clear perpendicular drop from the very highest point to ground - so there could be an error. If the measurement has to be taken at an offset then again it isn't 100% accurate.

Running a tape measure also isn't 100% accurate unless there is a clear and uninterrupted drop between the very most highest point of the load and the ground.

As an example, give a dozen people a tape measure and ask them to measure someone's height and you'll get a consistently wrong measurement. It'll only be wrong by plus or minus a centimetre but it will still be wrong. You wont get the exact same measurement from all.
If you measured 10mm away from the max would you drive it under a bridge on the motorway? I know I wouldn't.

All that jazz

7,632 posts

147 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
s p a c e m a n said:
Slightly off topic but seeing as there's a few truckers here, there's no consolidated database of bridge heights/weight limits is there? Annoys me that in 2016 I have to spend a minimum 20 minutes browsing google streetview before I go somewhere that I dont know with an abnormal load.
confused

Not sure if serious. There are tons of apps, programs and maps that list all the bridge heights in the UK down to B-road size and many for unclassified roads too. Can't believe you're doing abnormal load work and spend hours looking up every bridge on street view before you set off. Must be on a wind up surely.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 1st September 2016
quotequote all
s p a c e m a n said:
Slightly off topic but seeing as there's a few truckers here, there's no consolidated database of bridge heights/weight limits is there? Annoys me that in 2016 I have to spend a minimum 20 minutes browsing google streetview before I go somewhere that I dont know with an abnormal load.
Is ESDAL https://www.gov.uk/register-with-esdal no use or are you worrying unnecessarily when ducking
biglaugh

Also https://www.amazon.co.uk/AA-Truckers-Atlas-Britain...
Or with all A&B road bridge heights.
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/abnormal...

PM me with specifics and I'll have a word with the Abloads team leader when I'm back in next week to see if their contacts in the Abloads industry know of anything.

TBH 20 mins googling a route with streetview is nothing in time and planning terms for an Abloads.

skwdenyer

16,528 posts

241 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Back on topic, this is how the same firm arranged seems to have been an identical load on 7th May:



https://www.facebook.com/autorenovations/posts/906...

All that jazz

7,632 posts

147 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
confused Still makes no sense why do it like that when you could put the dumper on the front, reverse the duck on after and then easily tuck in the arm and bucket down in front of the machine cab with the arm overhanging the rear slightly. That's how it's always been done. Doing it like in the pic means needlessly complicated strapping to secure the arm, too.

Private Pile

754 posts

196 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
SilverSpur said:
Using a 'measuring stick' isn't accurate enough when trying to see if a load height is either 16'5" or 16'6" is it? Its not a scientific method of measuring something to that level of accuracy.

This is how we do it. I believe car transporters also use a measuring stick. Works fine.

Private Pile

754 posts

196 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
227bhp said:
If you measured 10mm away from the max would you drive it under a bridge on the motorway? I know I wouldn't.
Not on the motorway, but I do this almost on a daily basis.

SilverSpur

20,911 posts

248 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Private Pile said:
SilverSpur said:
Using a 'measuring stick' isn't accurate enough when trying to see if a load height is either 16'5" or 16'6" is it? Its not a scientific method of measuring something to that level of accuracy.

This is how we do it. I believe car transporters also use a measuring stick. Works fine.
I bet you build in a small tolerance for inaccuracy though...?



We'll have to see what this firms excuse is if they were over height, or if the bridge is not up to spec....

Private Pile

754 posts

196 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
SilverSpur said:
I bet you build in a small tolerance for inaccuracy though...?



We'll have to see what this firms excuse is if they were over height, or if the bridge is not up to spec....
I'm not accusing/ defending the plant driver, just saying how my company does it .

And yes your right about tolerances, I round up to the nearest inch.

paulrockliffe

15,718 posts

228 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
All that jazz said:
confused Still makes no sense why do it like that when you could put the dumper on the front, reverse the duck on after and then easily tuck in the arm and bucket down in front of the machine cab with the arm overhanging the rear slightly. That's how it's always been done. Doing it like in the pic means needlessly complicated strapping to secure the arm, too.
Are they using the bucket to save strapping the dumper down? yikes

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
paulrockliffe said:
All that jazz said:
confused Still makes no sense why do it like that when you could put the dumper on the front, reverse the duck on after and then easily tuck in the arm and bucket down in front of the machine cab with the arm overhanging the rear slightly. That's how it's always been done. Doing it like in the pic means needlessly complicated strapping to secure the arm, too.
Are they using the bucket to save strapping the dumper down? yikes
Or is it down to axle weight loading on one of the axles and they've been "stitched" by Vosa/dvsa previously?

227bhp

10,203 posts

129 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Private Pile said:
227bhp said:
If you measured 10mm away from the max would you drive it under a bridge on the motorway? I know I wouldn't.
Not on the motorway, but I do this almost on a daily basis.
Well therein lies the difference. I don't drive a truck, but i'd want to see about 300mm/1ft less, what would be your tolerance? Is there a tolerance quoted to work from?