Bridge collapse on M20
Discussion
Digga said:
es, they used Deutz a fair bit, as well as Dormans. Those early machines were so good it nearly finished the firm, because they went on forever.
British machines got left behind by the Japs though. The old man went from RB to JCB, but at that time, they couldn't really compete either, despite taking the competition's machines to bits:
Out of intrest, where was that photo taken? It looks very familiar.British machines got left behind by the Japs though. The old man went from RB to JCB, but at that time, they couldn't really compete either, despite taking the competition's machines to bits:
Hunky Dory said:
Digga said:
es, they used Deutz a fair bit, as well as Dormans. Those early machines were so good it nearly finished the firm, because they went on forever.
British machines got left behind by the Japs though. The old man went from RB to JCB, but at that time, they couldn't really compete either, despite taking the competition's machines to bits:
Out of intrest, where was that photo taken? It looks very familiar.British machines got left behind by the Japs though. The old man went from RB to JCB, but at that time, they couldn't really compete either, despite taking the competition's machines to bits:
You can see all the company Chavaliers in this one of the nicely bogged Hitachi:
227bhp said:
Private Pile said:
227bhp said:
If you measured 10mm away from the max would you drive it under a bridge on the motorway? I know I wouldn't.
Not on the motorway, but I do this almost on a daily basis. And just to clarify, I know nothing about the bridge strike, so I've no idea if the plant driver was at fault.
A 1 foot clearance would be nice but isn't practical. Look at all those double deckers trailers you pass on the motorway. The majority of those will be 16' plus.
To answer your question, my tolerance is what the sign says. If I'm 13'6" then I'll go under a 13'6" bridge. If I'm 13'7" then I won't. As long as I don't exceed the height then I'll use it. I do still duck going under bridges that I've used dozens of time though.
It's like a speed limit sign. 30 is ok, 31 isn't. Weight limits signs are the same, your either legal or not ( though there are exemptions )
I've also driven extensively in Europe for a major multinational oil and gas company and that is their policy too. It's not about fly by night companies cutting corners.
Anyway 227, I hope this help. I'm sure we'll find out in due course the true story what happened
Private Pile said:
If I'm 13'6" then I'll go under a 13'6" bridge. If I'm 13'7" then I won't.
As has already been said before, 13' 6" under 13' 6" bridge is what, in engineering term, is called an interference fit, i.e. it won't go. To prevent bridge strike, some clearance is essential.saaby93 said:
rolando said:
Agree, the sign allows clearance.
If there is a signDigga Whats that picture of a snake doing with your dog?
Unfortunately, it seems that unless they're on the move, dogs can't see snakes - as the picture illustrates.
I don't know whether this will work or not, but it seems they took the scientific approach to removing the remaining half of the bridge:
https://www.facebook.com/Colin.Fox1994/videos/1015...
https://www.facebook.com/Colin.Fox1994/videos/1015...
CAPP0 said:
I don't know whether this will work or not, but it seems they took the scientific approach to removing the remaining half of the bridge:
https://www.facebook.com/Colin.Fox1994/videos/1015...
Scientific in that they looked at the results of a previous experiment and repeated the same https://www.facebook.com/Colin.Fox1994/videos/1015...
- they pushed it over with a digger
The replacement will have improved lateral strength?
http://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/14714122.Thamesm...
ah well, no biggie, could have been worse is his general view.
ah well, no biggie, could have been worse is his general view.
CAPP0 said:
I don't know whether this will work or not, but it seems they took the scientific approach to removing the remaining half of the bridge:
https://www.facebook.com/Colin.Fox1994/videos/1015...
A graphic illustration of why you can't stick to normal air filter service and replacement cycles on demolition excavators.https://www.facebook.com/Colin.Fox1994/videos/1015...
boxedin said:
http://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/14714122.Thamesm...
ah well, no biggie, could have been worse is his general view.
"Mr Shaw said his wife Doreen, 68, only found out he had been taken to hospital in Tunbridge Wells after she rang him to ask him to bring the washing in."ah well, no biggie, could have been worse is his general view.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff