Man arrested after baby girl is punched in a supermarket.

Man arrested after baby girl is punched in a supermarket.

Author
Discussion

Digby

8,243 posts

247 months

Sunday 27th November 2016
quotequote all
La Liga said:
Digby said:
Make up what you like, chaps. I don't care how you want to entertain yourselves.
The one making things up is you by claiming the Judge's comments on the plausibility were him 'sending a message' (and indirectly saying the judge was lying).
It makes no difference to me what he thought.

I agree with the courts decision.

The sentence was light for PUNCHING!!!! a baby imho, so I'm happy.

Tough baby, too! I had a black eye just from my Mother swinging her arm around when reversing when I was sat in the passenger seat.


Anything else you add is, as I say, for your own entertainment.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 27th November 2016
quotequote all
Digby said:
La Liga said:
Digby said:
Make up what you like, chaps. I don't care how you want to entertain yourselves.
The one making things up is you by claiming the Judge's comments on the plausibility were him 'sending a message' (and indirectly saying the judge was lying).
It makes no difference to me what he thought.
I imagine not because it's not what you want to hear and why you tried to dismiss it with some rubbish about the judge saying it to merely 'sending a message'. The smoke and mirrors around 'punching' and 'serial baby puncher' etc doesn't change that.

Digby

8,243 posts

247 months

Sunday 27th November 2016
quotequote all
La Liga said:
imagine not because it's not what you want to hear and why you tried to dismiss it with some rubbish about the judge saying it to merely 'sending a message'. The smoke and mirrors around 'punching' and 'serial baby puncher' etc doesn't change that.
You lost me at "imagine"

I didn't want him to go to jail or have anything too serious happen to him and it hasn't.

I am glad.

The end.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 27th November 2016
quotequote all
I would agree with that. I don't think a custodial sentence would have been justified.

Zigster

1,655 posts

145 months

Sunday 27th November 2016
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
Baby punch Russian roulette? Only 1 is real.



These things are so realistic Police Officers have broken into cars to 'save' them i.e. even professionals are fooled.

The peculiar thing is that very young babies do have a very doll like complexion, if I had a £1 every time I'd heard someone ask a new mum if her baby was real.....

Why some people can't understand that the bloke made a very stupid but understandable mistake still baffles me.

Despite all the 'outrage', clearly the punishment reflected that it was not intended, and he was effectively let off with a slap on the wrist.
Wait, are you saying he punched what he thought was a real baby and it turned out to be a doll?

e8_pack

1,384 posts

182 months

Sunday 27th November 2016
quotequote all
Alpinestars said:
e8_pack said:
It's quite clear he thought the baby was a doll, owned by the 6yr old sat next to it in the trolly.

The question is, have you ever played with a child by use of its toys?

And when playing with those toys, do you treat them as delicate human beings incase they are real babies, or do you treat them like, well, toys.
The question was specifically for the poster I asked it to.

But, how is it clear he thought it was a toy? The judge didn't believe that to be the case. Why do you, with a lot less evidence?
Because of the sentence imposed.

Alpinestars

13,954 posts

245 months

Sunday 27th November 2016
quotequote all
e8_pack said:
Because of the sentence imposed.
So the judge lied, leading to a lenient sentence?

Words fail me with that "logic".

Murph7355

37,769 posts

257 months

Sunday 27th November 2016
quotequote all
Digby said:
...
So having my hair ruffled as a child by anyone who knew my parents or knew people who were with my parents should have resulted in my parents attacking someone?
Digby said:
...
We set fire to my "Flame on" Human Torch Fantastic Four doll in the 70's. I suppose I should be sectioned immediately!
The examples you give continually miss the point with their irrelevance.

Ruffling hair is not (1) punching and (2) being done to a baby. It would be reacted to as such.

Did a friend of your dad's ever take one of your dolls and set fire to it? Did any adult take one and do the same? I am assuming when you did this you were a child yourself?

Digby said:
...
You will just have to accept that like myself, there are people who had that been their baby, would have just accepted the sincere and traumatised apology, because they would have realised the mistake...
Not sure you answered before - do you have kids?

Digby said:
...
Your Father / best friend walks in to a pub, sits beside you and says "Oh my gosh, I can't believe what just happened to me....." and they go on to explain the story and their utter embarrassment, but how the parents of the baby laughed it off and said "No harm done", you would call the police and report them for being a risk towards babies?
Tricky scenario to answer as I cannot imagine any circumstance whatsoever where any acquaintance of mine, let alone my father or best friend, would ever do this!

It's not ducking the question either. It's such an inconceivable scenario to me that I have no idea what I would do. I cannot imagine how any adult of sane faculty thinks it's acceptable to punch a doll or a baby!

I ask again, do you have kids? And another question - as an adult have you ever punched a baby doll? Have any of your acquaintances?

Digby said:
I am. He sounds like the kind of person who is trying to put this guy behind bars.
...
Never a wise idea to make assumptions.

Digby

8,243 posts

247 months

Sunday 27th November 2016
quotequote all
Alpinestars said:
e8_pack said:
Because of the sentence imposed.
So the judge lied, leading to a lenient sentence?

Words fail me with that "logic".
Added the judge:

"It was strange and concerning behavior and impossible to explain. Elsie was a vulnerable five day old baby. I accept that this was a exceptional case. I also accept that it was spontaneous, it lacked any pre meditation and I do believe it was completely out of character"

"Implausible" can also be defined as unlikely rather than definitely, so perhaps, as many, many judges are, he was lenient due to the circumstances but at the same time appreciated you simply can't go around doing such things and expect to get away with it completely.

Remember, those in this thread and members of the babies family who clearly want a harsher sentence do not agree with the judge. What say you to those people? Was the judge wrong?


anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
e8_pack said:
Alpinestars said:
e8_pack said:
It's quite clear he thought the baby was a doll, owned by the 6yr old sat next to it in the trolly.

The question is, have you ever played with a child by use of its toys?

And when playing with those toys, do you treat them as delicate human beings incase they are real babies, or do you treat them like, well, toys.
The question was specifically for the poster I asked it to.

But, how is it clear he thought it was a toy? The judge didn't believe that to be the case. Why do you, with a lot less evidence?
Because of the sentence imposed.
I posted the sentencing guidelines earlier. That is where the sentence is derived from, nothing to do with a it being a toy, or who believed it to be so etc. This is either going to be a category 2 or 3 offence, which as can be seen at the bottom are both potentially covered by fines.


Alpinestars

13,954 posts

245 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
Digby said:
Added the judge:

"It was strange and concerning behavior and impossible to explain. Elsie was a vulnerable five day old baby. I accept that this was a exceptional case. I also accept that it was spontaneous, it lacked any pre meditation and I do believe it was completely out of character"

"Implausible" can also be defined as unlikely rather than definitely, so perhaps, as many, many judges are, he was lenient due to the circumstances but at the same time appreciated you simply can't go around doing such things and expect to get away with it completely.

Remember, those in this thread and members of the babies family who clearly want a harsher sentence do not agree with the judge. What say you to those people? Was the judge wrong?
Out of character, not premeditated, impossible to explain, exceptional, spontaneous. Doesn't make the act any better. As I asked earlier, and you avoided, if I murder someone, and all the above applied, would that make it less off an offence?

I'm talking the offence, not the sentence. I've not questioned the sentence. That's a separate matter.


Skyrat

1,185 posts

191 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
Alpinestars said:
Out of character, not premeditated, impossible to explain, exceptional, spontaneous. Doesn't make the act any better. As I asked earlier, and you avoided, if I murder someone, and all the above applied, would that make it less off an offence?
Yes, it's called manslaughter, and you just gave almost a textbook definition of such.


julian64

14,317 posts

255 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
Wow the mob takes a lot longer on this thread to disperse than it did to assemble.

I wonder if its the same with all mobs?

Maybe the number of brains in a mob are like resistors in parallel. Its not a simple addition

Edited by julian64 on Monday 28th November 15:48

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
Ahhh the old don't agree with me you are a bullying mob tactic. Oh the noes.

julian64

14,317 posts

255 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Ahhh the old don't agree with me you are a bullying mob tactic. Oh the noes.
Read any of my earlier posts on this thread. Perhaps it may serve?

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
I cannot believe this is continuing.

jakesmith

9,461 posts

172 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
Zod said:
I cannot believe this is continuing.
Fully agree with you Zod, some people just come on to a thread and drag it out, adding little of value, perhaps pointing out something obvious etc. Waste of time! Wonder if it will end soon.

schmunk

4,399 posts

126 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
jakesmith said:
Fully agree with you Zod, some people just come on to a thread and drag it out, adding little of value, perhaps pointing out something obvious etc. Waste of time! Wonder if it will end soon.
I can't see it happening soon. What do these idiots think prolonging this thread will achieve...?

Fat Fairy

503 posts

187 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
[quote=Maybe the number of brains in a mob are like resistors in series. Its not a simple addition
[/quote]

Err, Resistors in series ARE a simple addition.... confused

FF

julian64

14,317 posts

255 months

Monday 28th November 2016
quotequote all
Fat Fairy said:
[quote=Maybe the number of brains in a mob are like resistors in series. Its not a simple addition
Err, Resistors in series ARE a simple addition.... confused

FF
hehe I will admit I'm going blonde