Millions have saving of less than £100

Millions have saving of less than £100

Author
Discussion

BOR

4,705 posts

256 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
SPS said:
And 100 people have billions and pay bugger all tax so it's all"OK" then - NOT!
Capitalism. Works very, very well for some people, for the rest, not so much.

turbobloke

104,058 posts

261 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
BOR said:
SPS said:
And 100 people have billions and pay bugger all tax so it's all"OK" then - NOT!
Capitalism. Works very, very well for some people, for the rest, not so much.
To others, the alternative version of that is: capitalism is OK for most and even more OK for some because they happen to earn / inherit / win the difference.



Better with Corbyn but it'll do.


Jasandjules

69,947 posts

230 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
Only on PH is talk of a "mere" 60-100k salary deemed rational.

In the real world, many people earn less than 18k.....Plenty earn less than 30k.

Burwood

18,709 posts

247 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Only on PH is talk of a "mere" 60-100k salary deemed rational.

In the real world, many people earn less than 18k.....Plenty earn less than 30k.
how many active users are on PH, 2-300K. Probably very reflective of society with a London bias. I'm lucky i only have one kid at school so far. My neighbour has 3 kids all at a very expensive private school is 20k per annum each. thats 100k gross in fees. some earn a st load, some don't. and he works very hard for his money.

turbobloke

104,058 posts

261 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
There have been (and maybe still are) Barclays Premier Banking adverts on PH, they wouldn't waste their money on PH so take a look at the qualifying criteria and the implication is clear.

turbobloke

104,058 posts

261 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Only on PH is talk of a "mere" 60-100k salary deemed rational.
Maybe on HedgeFundManagersЯus.com as well.

Don

28,377 posts

285 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
BOR said:
SPS said:
And 100 people have billions and pay bugger all tax so it's all"OK" then - NOT!
Capitalism. Works very, very well for some people, for the rest, not so much.
To others, the alternative version of that is: capitalism is OK for most and even more OK for some because they happen to earn / inherit / win the difference.



Better with Corbyn but it'll do.
Capitalism is st. Just like Democracy. It's better than the alternatives.

It might be st but if you look at the standard of living of the citizens over time capitalism has delivered for the many, rather than just the few, over and time again. I'm looking at the results, not the fantasy. If the side effect is a few billionaires I'll take that "downside" for the fact that I have food on the table and cars in my driveway as do the vast majority here in the UK. Every last one of us won life's lottery just being British. I'm so grateful as should everyone be who gets to live on this Island Shangri-La.

turbobloke

104,058 posts

261 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
Don said:
turbobloke said:
BOR said:
SPS said:
And 100 people have billions and pay bugger all tax so it's all"OK" then - NOT!
Capitalism. Works very, very well for some people, for the rest, not so much.
To others, the alternative version of that is: capitalism is OK for most and even more OK for some because they happen to earn / inherit / win the difference.



Better with Corbyn but it'll do.
Capitalism is st. Just like Democracy. It's better than the alternatives.

It might be st but if you look at the standard of living of the citizens over time capitalism has delivered for the many, rather than just the few, over and time again. I'm looking at the results, not the fantasy. If the side effect is a few billionaires I'll take that "downside" for the fact that I have food on the table and cars in my driveway as do the vast majority here in the UK.
That's spot on therefore it doesn't justify the initial shcensoredt remark which is better aimed at socialism!

Trabi601

4,865 posts

96 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
I was reminded of this discussion when I received my post this morning.

A letter from Lloyds bank telling me they are cutting savings account rates. From 0.25% to 0.05%.

I don't keep much in there - had been using one account to receive rent from an investment house, and another for a holiday fund.

But it's no bloody surprise people don't have savings when it's difficult to find accounts which will just keep pace with inflation, beating inflation seems to be very difficult these days.

Don

28,377 posts

285 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
Trabi601 said:
I was reminded of this discussion when I received my post this morning.

A letter from Lloyds bank telling me they are cutting savings account rates. From 0.25% to 0.05%.

I don't keep much in there - had been using one account to receive rent from an investment house, and another for a holiday fund.

But it's no bloody surprise people don't have savings when it's difficult to find accounts which will just keep pace with inflation, beating inflation seems to be very difficult these days.
Totally agree. I have an account that was paying sufficient interest to cover its fees and make a profit. Now it will pay no interest at all. I need to move my funds around to try and get some return...liquidity is expensive and one only needs to retain so much.


p1stonhead

25,578 posts

168 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
Santander dropping it's rate from 3 to 1.5% was a bit annoying. Moved most of mine out now into other things.

KingNothing

3,169 posts

154 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
I have a few grand in a HTB ISA, once that is gone on the purchase of my house later this year I'll have no savings, all my available money will be going on paying bills/debts, doubt I'll have any savings till at least 2018. But once they're gone I do have quite a decent disposable income.

ATG

20,619 posts

273 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
klmhcp said:
scenario8 said:
klmhcp said:
London has 8m people living in it so of course stats will show wages as being less. The fact remains that if you're educated, bright and ambitious (so any decent grad), you can earn 100k in London within a few years without being in a particularly special role.
And possibly within your workplace your six figure earnings might be considered distinctly average. But even within London your earnings would remain well above average. Even amongst the bright, educated and ambitious you'd be doing very well.
Disagree but never mind.
Why do you choose to disagree? The evidence clearly shows that you are wrong. What makes you want to dismiss the evidence?

frisbee

4,983 posts

111 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
Saving and spending are opposite sides of the coin but in one way are very similar - its very difficult to stop doing both!

Don

28,377 posts

285 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
That's spot on therefore it doesn't justify the initial shcensoredt remark which is better aimed at socialism!
My point was Capitalism, like Democracy, is a crap system. It's just that out of all the systems we've tried its the one that has consistently had the best outcome for the general population. Countries that have tried other systems have invariably become failed states or totalitarian nightmares.

I'd love to believe in a vision of human society founded on peace, harmony and love where to each man according to his need and from each man according to his talent and all that st. It's just been proved to be bks. We're not all Star Trek and the Federation. We're not The Culture. So given that I'm all for the system that works in the real world. The one generating the most wealth for most of us. And that would be free market capitalism every time.

turbobloke

104,058 posts

261 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
Don said:
turbobloke said:
That's spot on therefore it doesn't justify the initial shcensoredt remark which is better aimed at socialism!
My point was Capitalism, like Democracy, is a crap system.
That was understood I assure you, but shcensoredt and crap aren't justified given the benefits that have arisen for so many. Surely "good and inevitably imperfect but better than the alternatives" is more like it.

If you still disagree, such is life beer

Don

28,377 posts

285 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
beer
beer

Randy Winkman

16,199 posts

190 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
It's been pointed out that when interest rates are high, inflation is high. But when I started work in the 80s there was a motivation to be "sensible" and save a bit because it was satisfying to see the money go up 10% a year. Even if it was a bit irrational, it's what loads of us used to do. Now it is rather the case of "what's the point saving?" Especially since people have made far more out of mortgages/property. I'm sure all this is also pushing up the price of classic cars too; just when I want to get one. frown Though not he worst problem in the world, I guess.

del mar

2,838 posts

200 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
When I earned X we seemed to live an alright life, modest mortgage, holidays £11,000 car.

Now I earn a multiple of X we don't seem to have as much spare cash as we used to, spending just seems to expand into what you earn- I dont k ow how that happens.

I have friends that have little money, but seem to get buy ok, and friends who earn a lot that spend it as if it is going out of fashion.

I would be interested to know of those with no savings how many have hd tv's and "rented" cars....

Biker 1

7,745 posts

120 months

Saturday 1st October 2016
quotequote all
I have an offset mortgage, with 3 'pots': current account, savings account, & mortgage account. Does this mean I'm actually saving anything??