Millions have saving of less than £100

Millions have saving of less than £100

Author
Discussion

V8mate

45,899 posts

189 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
MG CHRIS said:
Im pretty fortunate im 24 and ...
Proper bizarre revelation! Reading your posts over the years I'd always assumed you were retired!

Carry on!

RYH64E

7,960 posts

244 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
V8mate said:
MG CHRIS said:
Im pretty fortunate im 24 and ...
Proper bizarre revelation! Reading your posts over the years I'd always assumed you were retired!

Carry on!
MGJohn?

Camoradi

4,291 posts

256 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
I'd assume MGAnyone would be retired

V8mate

45,899 posts

189 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
RYH64E said:
V8mate said:
MG CHRIS said:
Im pretty fortunate im 24 and ...
Proper bizarre revelation! Reading your posts over the years I'd always assumed you were retired!

Carry on!
MGJohn?
Ah! Could well be! The BTCC fanatic.

sparks_E39

12,738 posts

213 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
[redacted]

BuzzBravado

2,944 posts

171 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
Camoradi said:
I'd assume MGAnyone would be retired
hehe

A fair assumption.

paulrockliffe

15,705 posts

227 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
TheLordJohn said:
paulrockliffe said:
Similarly, if you track your finances using software, getting as many transactions onto your bank statement as possible, rather than undocumented cash, makes that much easier and more accurate.
Are you on crack? When I withdraw £100, my account shows £100 less than it used to...
As oppose to when my mrs spends £150 on my debit card and it takes 3 days to show up on my online banking.
No I'm not on crack.

I'll concede that if you need a daily reconciliation you'd be better off recording your cash spending than looking at a bank statement. but then you'd be better off looking at what your receipts say rather than the cash withdrawal on your bank statement. Not all withdrawals appear same day for me though, so that isn't necessarily more accurate on a daily reconciliation.

If you can cope with a monthly reconciliation a few days after the end of the month then a statement that says, "Greggs £1.80" is far more useful than one that says, "Cash £100". You either don't record what that was spent on or it's a pain in the backside to reconcile to another set of records that you're holding.

shakotan

10,697 posts

196 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
I have zero savings, never have since I was a school kid.

I just live payslip to payslip.

Gandahar

9,600 posts

128 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
My mum, who is now 89. and has been living off pensions for high on 30 years has managed to accrue

£6000+.

That's £17 per week averaged over 30 years.

Mind you she was brought up during rationing, Spitfires v Smartphones. I still have arguments with her over less than £1 .......


Perhaps we need a WWIII to get us back to reality?



Efbe

9,251 posts

166 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
TheLordJohn said:
paulrockliffe said:
Similarly, if you track your finances using software, getting as many transactions onto your bank statement as possible, rather than undocumented cash, makes that much easier and more accurate.
Are you on crack? When I withdraw £100, my account shows £100 less than it used to...
As oppose to when my mrs spends £150 on my debit card and it takes 3 days to show up on my online banking.
Mine shows within minutes. Think your bank is broken.

What bank are you?


otolith

56,135 posts

204 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
[redacted]

otolith

56,135 posts

204 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
Willy Nilly said:
If poverty is classed as having 60% of median income, then the remaining 40% will always be classed as being in poverty no matter how much money they have.
I think you've misunderstood the maths.

The median income is the amount of money that 50% of the people earn either side of. If you take 60% of that amount of money, some proportion of the population will earn less than it, but without knowing the frequency distribution of income, you can't say what proportion.

"Relative poverty" is just rebranding "inequality" in a way that sidesteps the debate about whether it is inherently problematic or not (which is a political position). It's a form of begging the question.

freenote

784 posts

168 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
z4RRSchris said:
5% pension from work. Don't pay in myself

I spunk it on rent, cars, food, holidays, clothes watches taxis booze and the girlfriend

I could sell some of my material goods if I really wanted to if st hit the fan





Edited by z4RRSchris on Friday 30th September 19:22
You sound like you have a good time. I'm similar age...ish, same line of work, same city, trying to make myself spend more and worry about a rainy day less. Teach me the way to enlightenment

turbobloke

103,956 posts

260 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
freenote said:
z4RRSchris said:
5% pension from work. Don't pay in myself

I spunk it on rent, cars, food, holidays, clothes watches taxis booze and the girlfriend

I could sell some of my material goods if I really wanted to if st hit the fan
You sound like you have a good time. I'm similar age...ish, same line of work, same city, trying to make myself spend more and worry about a rainy day less. Teach me the way to enlightenment
If z4RRSchris is too busy there's at least one educational dramatisation which has helped generations of spunkers to spunk on to the end:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0182442/

Extension work source:


HTH rotate

NRS

22,171 posts

201 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
freenote said:
z4RRSchris said:
5% pension from work. Don't pay in myself

I spunk it on rent, cars, food, holidays, clothes watches taxis booze and the girlfriend

I could sell some of my material goods if I really wanted to if st hit the fan
Edited by z4RRSchris on Friday 30th September 19:22
You sound like you have a good time. I'm similar age...ish, same line of work, same city, trying to make myself spend more and worry about a rainy day less. Teach me the way to enlightenment
Thing is it is a balance. The more you save now the less you have to save later, because of the compound effects of gains. Obviously in the bank there is very little interest, but you can make bigger gains with some risk. Saving say £3000 now will mean you have the equivalent of £6500 after 20 years with 4% interest. That means a lot less saving later in life, and if you do the normal life approach for most it will be more difficult to save more later as although you earn more you will have bigger outgoings on family.

It's important to have fun now, but from the sounds of it Z4RRSchris is too far on the spend side to balance the best now with the future. Which is perfectly fine for him to do as it's his money (assuming the rest of us don't have to bail him out later if he ends up jobless with no savings)!

TheLordJohn

5,746 posts

146 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
In my experience, those who prefer to pay for everything on card tend to have a lot less control over, and be more blasé, with their money.
Those who use cash more than card, tend to look after their money better.

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

NerveAgent

3,315 posts

220 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
TheLordJohn said:
In my experience, those who prefer to pay for everything on card tend to have a lot less control over, and be more blasé, with their money.
Those who use cash more than card, tend to look after their money better.
What a load of bks smile

klmhcp

247 posts

92 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
TheLordJohn said:
In my experience, those who prefer to pay for everything on card tend to have a lot less control over, and be more blasé, with their money.
Those who use cash more than card, tend to look after their money better.
I'd be interested in the size of the evidence base behind this statement.

Trabi601

4,865 posts

95 months

Wednesday 5th October 2016
quotequote all
klmhcp said:
I'd be interested in the size of the evidence base behind this statement.
Difficult one to survey as they're all huddled around wood fires in their caves.