Chancel Repair Liability

Author
Discussion

mjb1

Original Poster:

2,556 posts

159 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
Searches on the house that I'm buying show that it is in a parish that has the potential to have chancel repair liability registered against it, although this property doesn't have at present. Solicitor and information on the internet seem to suggest that the liability can't be registered to a title after October 2013, as long as ownership has changed since then.

Previous owner bought 10 years ago, so my interpretation is that the repair liability could only be registered while they are still the registered owners? After I've completed purchase it can't be registered in future?

If that's the case, then it hardly seems worth taking out the insurance against it?

knk

1,267 posts

271 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
As I understand it, CRL must all be registered now, so you no longer have to purchase insurance against the risk it may have a liability.
If there is no registered liability, there is no liability; your conveyancing solicitor should check and sort.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
Given the fact that chancel repair insurance costs are pretty insignificant I'd go with the recommendation of the solicitor.

Yours

A.N Insurance Broker.

mjb1

Original Poster:

2,556 posts

159 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
desolate said:
Given the fact that chancel repair insurance costs are pretty insignificant I'd go with the recommendation of the solicitor.

Yours

A.N Insurance Broker.
Solicitor doesn't seem to want to recommend on anything - just gives the options and sits firmly on the fence.

kowalski655

14,640 posts

143 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
Isnt CRL insurance only buttons anyway(assuming your lawyer says its needed)

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
mjb1 said:
Solicitor doesn't seem to want to recommend on anything - just gives the options and sits firmly on the fence.
I am inclined to agree that is should have been registered by now.
If you are risk averse I'd take the policy as at the very least they will defend any claim, even if it is invalid.
This means you will have minimal hassle if you get an uppity viar who needs a new roof, or whatever it is.

blueg33

35,894 posts

224 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
Seriously, just insure it. Solicitor send details to the usual Defective Title type insurers they look at it and provide a quote, I doubt it will be more than £500, probably a lot less.

We take out chancel repair insurance frequently, its quicker and easier than trying to decide whether it was registered in time etc.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
desolate said:
Yours

A.N Insurance Broker.
Indeed. Biggest fking scam going, but you've got to suck it up.

blueg33

35,894 posts

224 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
desolate said:
Yours

A.N Insurance Broker.
Indeed. Biggest fking scam going, but you've got to suck it up.
All defective title insurance or restrictive covenant insurance is mo0ney for old rope.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
hornetrider said:
desolate said:
Yours

A.N Insurance Broker.
Indeed. Biggest fking scam going, but you've got to suck it up.
All defective title insurance or restrictive covenant insurance is mo0ney for old rope.
All insurance is until it's needed.

I don't sell anything like that anymore but I do know of a few pretty meaty cases where it's been extremely valuable and one case where the vendor wishes he had bought - sale reduced to the tune of about 800k.

chrisga

2,089 posts

187 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
We paid for chancel liability insurance on our last purchase after learning about this in a village nearby:

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2009/sep/28/gleb...

Think it cost about £25 or something daft. As others said in the big scheme of a house move nothing.

p1esk

4,914 posts

196 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
This issue came up when we were buying our current home about two years ago, but the premium was such a trifling sum that we felt it would be foolish not to protect against CRL.

blueg33

35,894 posts

224 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
desolate said:
blueg33 said:
hornetrider said:
desolate said:
Yours

A.N Insurance Broker.
Indeed. Biggest fking scam going, but you've got to suck it up.
All defective title insurance or restrictive covenant insurance is mo0ney for old rope.
All insurance is until it's needed.

I don't sell anything like that anymore but I do know of a few pretty meaty cases where it's been extremely valuable and one case where the vendor wishes he had bought - sale reduced to the tune of about 800k.
In 30 years of buying these policies almost every month i have never had to claim, nor have successors in title. Generally, by the time you have satisfied insurance co questions you are pretty sure there is zero risk. Yet buyers solicitors expect a policy. ,