Theresa May

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

ecurie

383 posts

202 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
Jimboka said:
May has got the Conservatives in a real muddle & making our country look desperate & a laughing stock.
Holding Trumps hand like a love struck teenager . State visit offered in his first week. Roll forward a few days & her party openly criticise him. Self inflicted wounds & as dumb as the rude criticism from Bojo & co before he won.
Trump must be pretty confused by the populist furore from his new best friends party.
I understand May is desperate for a trade deal but if she continues like this she'll make Britain look even more like America's lapdog than Blair did. Come on, it used to be the French who surrendered, but the UK is quickly taking their place.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
ecurie said:
Jimboka said:
May has got the Conservatives in a real muddle & making our country look desperate & a laughing stock.
Holding Trumps hand like a love struck teenager . State visit offered in his first week. Roll forward a few days & her party openly criticise him. Self inflicted wounds & as dumb as the rude criticism from Bojo & co before he won.
Trump must be pretty confused by the populist furore from his new best friends party.
I understand May is desperate for a trade deal but if she continues like this she'll make Britain look even more like America's lapdog than Blair did. Come on, it used to be the French who surrendered, but the UK is quickly taking their place.
TBF, What can May do? She was openly against Trump and Brexit, then they both won. Now she has to make the best of the hand she's been dealt. Worse really that Brexit makes her have to race to ingratiate herself to Trump as she (through no fault of her own) now needs new trade deals.

PRTVR

7,101 posts

221 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
ecurie said:
Jimboka said:
May has got the Conservatives in a real muddle & making our country look desperate & a laughing stock.
Holding Trumps hand like a love struck teenager . State visit offered in his first week. Roll forward a few days & her party openly criticise him. Self inflicted wounds & as dumb as the rude criticism from Bojo & co before he won.
Trump must be pretty confused by the populist furore from his new best friends party.
I understand May is desperate for a trade deal but if she continues like this she'll make Britain look even more like America's lapdog than Blair did. Come on, it used to be the French who surrendered, but the UK is quickly taking their place.
How things can be viewed differently, the ones who are scared are the EU, Trump is going to help break it up, remember lap dogs get well looked after. wink

don4l

Original Poster:

10,058 posts

176 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
ecurie said:
Jimboka said:
May has got the Conservatives in a real muddle & making our country look desperate & a laughing stock.
Holding Trumps hand like a love struck teenager . State visit offered in his first week. Roll forward a few days & her party openly criticise him. Self inflicted wounds & as dumb as the rude criticism from Bojo & co before he won.
Trump must be pretty confused by the populist furore from his new best friends party.
I understand May is desperate for a trade deal but if she continues like this she'll make Britain look even more like America's lapdog than Blair did. Come on, it used to be the French who surrendered, but the UK is quickly taking their place.
I would suggest that you Google "battle of Verdun" before you accuse the French of cowardice.

They lost about 340,000 lives at this city alone.

http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/world-war-one...


andy_s

19,400 posts

259 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
ecurie said:
I understand May is desperate for a trade deal but if she continues like this she'll make Britain look even more like America's lapdog than Blair did. Come on, it used to be the French who surrendered, but the UK is quickly taking their place.
Why care more about the characterisation of the relationship by others rather than the actual benefits of the relationship; far from surrendering, we'd be winning in practical terms.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
andy_s said:
ecurie said:
I understand May is desperate for a trade deal but if she continues like this she'll make Britain look even more like America's lapdog than Blair did. Come on, it used to be the French who surrendered, but the UK is quickly taking their place.
Why care more about the characterisation of the relationship by others rather than the actual benefits of the relationship; far from surrendering, we'd be winning in practical terms.
It might end up all going wrong though for May, perhaps she's damaging the reputation of the UK by rushing to be first to validate him as a world leader and banging on about the special relationship.

If Trump turns out to be the disaster,many other countries are expecting, maybe history won't be kind to her and the UK over this in the long run. hehe

andy_s

19,400 posts

259 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
El stovey said:
It might end up all going wrong though for May, perhaps she's damaging the reputation of the UK by rushing to be first to validate him as a world leader and banging on about the special relationship.

If Trump turns out to be the disaster,many other countries are expecting, maybe history won't be kind to her and the UK over this in the long run. hehe
Oh I think it's a risk & she may get a bit of egg on her face yet; these are strange times and someone had to go first I guess... I think it's a risk worth taking given our current situation though and anyway, we can just blame her and get another PM if the worst comes to the worst smile

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
El stovey said:
validate him as a world leader
The American people validated him as a world leader when they elected him as President of the United States.

It doesn't matter what we, or any other nation state does, that is the reality.

That means we have to deal with him if we wish to deal with the USA. That has been the case since WW2 irrespective of who is in the White House.

Troubleatmill

10,210 posts

159 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
jsf said:
El stovey said:
validate him as a world leader
The American people validated him as a world leader when they elected him as President of the United States.

It doesn't matter what we, or any other nation state does, that is the reality.

That means we have to deal with him if we wish to deal with the USA. That has been the case since WW2 irrespective of who is in the White House.
^This

I am finding a new respect for the PM.
She is getting the job done.
Hats off.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
Troubleatmill said:
jsf said:
El stovey said:
validate him as a world leader
The American people validated him as a world leader when they elected him as President of the United States.

It doesn't matter what we, or any other nation state does, that is the reality.

That means we have to deal with him if we wish to deal with the USA. That has been the case since WW2 irrespective of who is in the White House.
^This

I am finding a new respect for the PM.
She is getting the job done.
Hats off.
Maybe that's the kind of thing people were sayng about Neville Chamberlain in 1938.

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

98 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
El stovey said:
Troubleatmill said:
jsf said:
El stovey said:
validate him as a world leader
The American people validated him as a world leader when they elected him as President of the United States.

It doesn't matter what we, or any other nation state does, that is the reality.

That means we have to deal with him if we wish to deal with the USA. That has been the case since WW2 irrespective of who is in the White House.
^This

I am finding a new respect for the PM.
She is getting the job done.
Hats off.
Maybe that's the kind of thing people were sayng about Neville Chamberlain in 1938.
Your ignorance is lamentable.


anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
Sylvaforever said:
El stovey said:
Troubleatmill said:
jsf said:
El stovey said:
validate him as a world leader
The American people validated him as a world leader when they elected him as President of the United States.

It doesn't matter what we, or any other nation state does, that is the reality.

That means we have to deal with him if we wish to deal with the USA. That has been the case since WW2 irrespective of who is in the White House.
^This

I am finding a new respect for the PM.
She is getting the job done.
Hats off.
Maybe that's the kind of thing people were sayng about Neville Chamberlain in 1938.
Your ignorance is lamentable.

That's a bit odd of you,

I'm simply saying that May (along with many other world leaders) has already been critical of Trump and seems to be in a bit too much of a hurry to ingratiate herself with him, I know she's been forced into having to make trade deals after Brexit but wouldn't it be better to sit back and wait for a few weeks or months?

He might turn out to be a great President or may actually be an absolutely terrible President , the whole Trump phenomenon is a bit remarkable and unpredictable and too early to tell how it will go in my view.

If he turns out to be the worst president in history (which is possible), that photo of them holding hands is going to be all she is remembered for.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 31st January 2017
quotequote all
Lets say Trump turns out to be a complete dick and is impeached Stovey.

What happens then is you get Pence as the President, who is Trump x 100.

If Pence gets the boot you then have to deal with the House leader, another Republican.

May went down a storm in the USA amongst the Republicans, it was like watching a conservative party conference on steroids. laugh

Murph7355

37,708 posts

256 months

Wednesday 1st February 2017
quotequote all
jsf said:
El stovey said:
validate him as a world leader
The American people validated him as a world leader when they elected him as President of the United States.

It doesn't matter what we, or any other nation state does, that is the reality.

That means we have to deal with him if we wish to deal with the USA. That has been the case since WW2 irrespective of who is in the White House.
100%.

"Validate him as a world leader"! Sorry stovey, but get your head out of your arse. You don't like Trump... So what. Democracy risks people getting people they don't like in power. The key thing is he was voted in by the people he is there to serve.

And I've asked this of others with no answer, but what has he actually done since 20th Jan that's an issue? Switch "Trump" for "Obama" and would we have the same degree of whining? Somehow I can't see it. Same with Brexit.

loafer123

15,440 posts

215 months

Wednesday 1st February 2017
quotequote all

Everyone seems to be surprised that he is doing what he campaigned to do.

Perhaps that says more about the political system where we assume we are being lied to, than about Trump himself.

ecurie

383 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st February 2017
quotequote all
loafer123 said:
Everyone seems to be surprised that he is doing what he campaigned to do.

Perhaps that says more about the political system where we assume we are being lied to, than about Trump himself.
Not surprised at all.
But that doesn't mean people have to agree.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 1st February 2017
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
jsf said:
El stovey said:
validate him as a world leader
The American people validated him as a world leader when they elected him as President of the United States.

It doesn't matter what we, or any other nation state does, that is the reality.

That means we have to deal with him if we wish to deal with the USA. That has been the case since WW2 irrespective of who is in the White House.
100%.

"Validate him as a world leader"! Sorry stovey, but get your head out of your arse. You don't like Trump... So what. Democracy risks people getting people they don't like in power. The key thing is he was voted in by the people he is there to serve.

And I've asked this of others with no answer, but what has he actually done since 20th Jan that's an issue? Switch "Trump" for "Obama" and would we have the same degree of whining? Somehow I can't see it. Same with Brexit.
Where have I said I don't like Trump? I don't like or dislike him, I just find it interesting watching his presidency unfold. Do we have to all take sides for tribal with us or against us Internet fighting?

I'm merely saying that he's a unknown quantity and certainly unconventional, it's not beyond possibility that being the first in line to suck up to him, especially after her and many of her party have been so vociferous in their condemnation of him, might end up going badly.

Edited by anonymous-user on Wednesday 1st February 10:48

Mark Benson

7,514 posts

269 months

Wednesday 1st February 2017
quotequote all
El stovey said:
Murph7355 said:
jsf said:
El stovey said:
validate him as a world leader
The American people validated him as a world leader when they elected him as President of the United States.

It doesn't matter what we, or any other nation state does, that is the reality.

That means we have to deal with him if we wish to deal with the USA. That has been the case since WW2 irrespective of who is in the White House.
100%.

"Validate him as a world leader"! Sorry stovey, but get your head out of your arse. You don't like Trump... So what. Democracy risks people getting people they don't like in power. The key thing is he was voted in by the people he is there to serve.

And I've asked this of others with no answer, but what has he actually done since 20th Jan that's an issue? Switch "Trump" for "Obama" and would we have the same degree of whining? Somehow I can't see it. Same with Brexit.
Where have I said I don't like Trump? I don't like or dislike him, I just find it interesting watching his presidency unfold. Do we have to all take sides for tribal with us or against us Internet fighting?

I'm merely saying that he's a unknown quantity and certainly unconventional, it's not beyond possibility that being the first in line to suck up to him, especially after her and many of her party have been so vociferous in their condemnation of him, might end up going badly.

Edited by El stovey on Wednesday 1st February 10:48
Assuming it's voted through later today, she's got to start negotiating with the EU in a few weeks. I'd rather she was doing that from a position of strength and the backing of the leader of the world's wealthiest nation is an asset, regardless of the person in the job.

Murph7355

37,708 posts

256 months

Wednesday 1st February 2017
quotequote all
El stovey said:
Where have I said I don't like Trump? I don't like or dislike him, I just find it interesting watching his presidency unfold. Do we have to all take sides for tribal with us or against us Internet fighting?

I'm merely saying that he's a unknown quantity and certainly unconventional, it's not beyond possibility that being the first in line to suck up to him, especially after her and many of her party have been so vociferous in their condemnation of him, might end up going badly.
The tone of the language you use seems some distance from objective.

Apologies if I have that wrong.

Same question applies though - objectively what has he done that should warrant a travel ban to here? And as we were invited over there just a week after his inauguration, why do we need to dither on reciprocating? What harm could come of it? (Other than the EU becoming ever more grumpy with us... Which is inevitable anyway).

Now, if the trade deal we are eventually offered is dog st, then by all means moan. But the best way to enter negotiations is with the intent to do something that works for both sides. Surely it's better to start of in as friendly a manner as you can as a result.

(Compare and contrast with EU rhetoric towards us, in the main).

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 3rd February 2017
quotequote all
Sounds like May is doing some good work in Malta telling freeloading NATO members to pay their share.

I wonder if this is linked to her meeting with Trump.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED