Could UK U-turn on Referendum Result (Vol 2)

Could UK U-turn on Referendum Result (Vol 2)

Author
Discussion

steveT350C

6,728 posts

162 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
alfie2244 said:
Dindoit said:
"Some racists" voted Leave? Exactly how many racists do you you reckon voted Remain? Be honest. We both know the answer to that question.

To say all Leave voters are racist is a really dumb and, ironically, prejudiced bigoted nonsense. Just like attention seekers calling Remain voters traitors. However you can be absolutely certain every racist voter ticked Leave.
Well as the EU policy is to discriminate against those from outside of the EU, i.e Africa, India, and the entire ROW except 27 countries I could suggest there could have been more racists voting for Remain........can you be absolutely certain that is not the case?
Absolutely!
Dindoit must be a racist if he is a Remainer. Remainers discriminate against people who do not come from EU (white) countries.

B'stard Child

28,458 posts

247 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
alfie2244 said:
Dindoit said:
"Some racists" voted Leave? Exactly how many racists do you you reckon voted Remain? Be honest. We both know the answer to that question.

To say all Leave voters are racist is a really dumb and, ironically, prejudiced bigoted nonsense. Just like attention seekers calling Remain voters traitors. However you can be absolutely certain every racist voter ticked Leave.
Well as the EU policy is to discriminate against those from outside of the EU, i.e Africa, India, and the entire ROW except 27 countries I could suggest there could have been more racists voting for Remain........can you be absolutely certain that is not the case?
I wouldn't use the term "Discriminate" - it sounds a bit.... well.... racist or xenophobic

Much better to use the term "Protectionist" - sound more defence like but I guess that's risky because it's an exclusive club with member only benefits

How about a "Common Market" - "common" - meaning shared by, coming from, or done by two or more people, groups, or things - that sounds good. "Market" - Meaning a regular gathering of people for the purchase and sale of provisions, livestock, and other commodities.

Now how could anyone mistake that for "discriminatory" or "protectionist"

Now just struggling to see where it all went wrong.........

Dindoit

1,645 posts

95 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
Disingenuous. Not really worth discussing further.

B'stard Child

28,458 posts

247 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
Dindoit said:
Disingenuous. Not really worth discussing further.
What dictionary do you have??

Disingenuous - not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.

"this journalist was being somewhat disingenuous as well as cynical"

synonyms: dishonest, deceitful, underhand, underhanded, duplicitous, double-dealing, two-faced, dissembling, insincere, false, lying, untruthful, mendacious;

Ahh I get it you were referring to the EU good to see we agree beer

Oh and if a Parrot is due - I'll take one now but it needs to be a "Cyber Monday" one

Fastdruid

8,674 posts

153 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
B'stard Child said:
Oh and the NHS won't get 350m a day biglaugh sorry it won't
It never was going to. It's not even what the bus said (although admittedly it insinuated it). Although it's seems what plenty of remainers would have liked it to say.

If I'm honest I'm somewhat in awe of the person behind the bus. From a campaign POV it is amazing. Even now, 5 months after the result and people can't stop talking about it. From the colour to the wording that was blatantly wrong yet in it's wrongness at best the argument could be made that it was still a lot of money. It was an absolute masterpiece.




anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
///ajd said:
steveT350C said:
///ajd said:
The issue is for those hanging onto every publically spoken word from Theresa as the absolute gospel truth as to what will happen.

Immigration is the priority over trade. Let's see how that pans out.
Do you hang on to every publicly spoken word by TM? Me neither. BBC viewers maybe?
Some here have.

e.g. 535i and his "brexit means brexit" - a bone I still don't think he has managed to put down.
laugh I think you trump everyone with your racist bone.

Managed to find those quotes yet?

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
Fastdruid said:
It never was going to. It's not even what the bus said (although admittedly it insinuated it). Although it's seems what plenty of remainers would have liked it to say.

If I'm honest I'm somewhat in awe of the person behind the bus. From a campaign POV it is amazing. Even now, 5 months after the result and people can't stop talking about it. From the colour to the wording that was blatantly wrong yet in it's wrongness at best the argument could be made that it was still a lot of money. It was an absolute masterpiece.


beer



///ajd

8,964 posts

207 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
alfie2244 said:
Dindoit said:
"Some racists" voted Leave? Exactly how many racists do you you reckon voted Remain? Be honest. We both know the answer to that question.

To say all Leave voters are racist is a really dumb and, ironically, prejudiced bigoted nonsense. Just like attention seekers calling Remain voters traitors. However you can be absolutely certain every racist voter ticked Leave.
Well as the EU policy is to discriminate against those from outside of the EU, i.e Africa, India, and the entire ROW except 27 countries I could suggest there could have been more racists voting for Remain........can you be absolutely certain that is not the case?
This line is really dumb and is typical of the bullst that UKIP and the like have been feeding the gullible to soak up their ideals and de-sensitised anti-immigrant rhetoric.

The EU does NOT place any limits on non-EU immigration at all. This is not within the control of the EU. Member states determine policy for non-EU citizens into the EU.

Hence member states could chose to have completely free movement of people from anywhere in the world if they so chose. Not limited by the EU at all.

The UK choice to limit non-EU immigration is just that - a sovereign choice of the UK that it made completely unfettered by interference from the EU.

facts_not_ignorant_b0110cks said:
National Immigration Rules

Each EU country alone decides:
- The total number of migrants that can be admitted to the country to look for work;
- All final decisions on migrant applications;
- Rules on long-term visas – stays for periods longer than three months; and
- Conditions to obtain residence and work permits when no EU-wide rules have been adopted.[/facts]

Peddling this "EU discriminates" nonsense just makes you sound like Paul Nuttalls from UKIPs.


davepoth

29,395 posts

200 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
///ajd said:
The UK choice to limit non-EU immigration is just that - a sovereign choice of the UK that it made completely unfettered by interference from the EU.
You are aware of the concept of repressed demand, aren't you?

B'stard Child

28,458 posts

247 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
Fastdruid said:
B'stard Child said:
Oh and the NHS won't get 350m a day biglaugh sorry it won't
It never was going to. It's not even what the bus said (although admittedly it insinuated it). Although it's seems what plenty of remainers would have liked it to say.
Shhhh we know that but it's still getting chucked out every time we mention the other lies the remain side said..... they think it's a bit like kryptonite - they mention it and we can't argue hehe

Fastdruid said:
If I'm honest I'm somewhat in awe of the person behind the bus. From a campaign POV it is amazing. Even now, 5 months after the result and people can't stop talking about it. From the colour to the wording that was blatantly wrong yet in it's wrongness at best the argument could be made that it was still a lot of money. It was an absolute masterpiece.
I was surprised Trump didn't use the same tactic - I mean clearly say something outrageous to get the media frothing away and provide all the coverage he needed to get his core message out.... While the media ridicule the inaccuracy of it all and how it's the wrong number the wrong solution etc etc all the time providing the air time he would have otherwise not got at all.

scratchchin

///ajd

8,964 posts

207 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
Fastdruid said:
B'stard Child said:
Oh and the NHS won't get 350m a day biglaugh sorry it won't
It never was going to. It's not even what the bus said (although admittedly it insinuated it). Although it's seems what plenty of remainers would have liked it to say.

If I'm honest I'm somewhat in awe of the person behind the bus. From a campaign POV it is amazing. Even now, 5 months after the result and people can't stop talking about it. From the colour to the wording that was blatantly wrong yet in it's wrongness at best the argument could be made that it was still a lot of money. It was an absolute masterpiece.
Notoriety happens with spectacularly dishonest scams and other illegal behaviour, especially when promoted by serving elected officials.

It could be called bus-gate really.

44 years later and that is still a household name. Not really something to be proud of though.









anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
///ajd said:
This is Tusks letter.



Has anyone seen Tomlinsons letter?

Fox's own rants on the subject can't have helped.
Is it just me that reads that letter and thinks its written by a 16 year old student?
It's hardly statesman like.

alfie2244

11,292 posts

189 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
davepoth said:
///ajd said:
The UK choice to limit non-EU immigration is just that - a sovereign choice of the UK that it made completely unfettered by interference from the EU.
You are aware of the concept of repressed demand, aren't you?
That's just a term used to bullst the dumb and gullible biggrin

Fastdruid

8,674 posts

153 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
///ajd said:
Fastdruid said:
B'stard Child said:
Oh and the NHS won't get 350m a day biglaugh sorry it won't
It never was going to. It's not even what the bus said (although admittedly it insinuated it). Although it's seems what plenty of remainers would have liked it to say.

If I'm honest I'm somewhat in awe of the person behind the bus. From a campaign POV it is amazing. Even now, 5 months after the result and people can't stop talking about it. From the colour to the wording that was blatantly wrong yet in it's wrongness at best the argument could be made that it was still a lot of money. It was an absolute masterpiece.
Notoriety happens with spectacularly dishonest scams and other illegal behaviour, especially when promoted by serving elected officials.
Ah. You mean like calling a referendum while banning the civil service from considering anything other than the official position, including even talking to the other side?

///ajd

8,964 posts

207 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
davepoth said:
///ajd said:
The UK choice to limit non-EU immigration is just that - a sovereign choice of the UK that it made completely unfettered by interference from the EU.
You are aware of the concept of repressed demand, aren't you?
Yes. Still a choice though. Our choice. Our choice as a sovereign state. British Parliaments choice.

Nothing to do with the EU.

"The EU made us have freedom of movement so we had no choice". Nonsense. Always our choice.

And look how well May did in reducing non-EU migration down to 10,000 or whatever it was supposed to be. Didn't get the number down much, did she? Now why do we think that was?

Turns out migration works for this country - but shhhhhhh! - we're not allowed to say so or we might lose some votes!





don'tbesilly

13,940 posts

164 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
B'stard Child said:
Oh and the NHS won't get 350m a day biglaugh sorry it won't
Are we back on that one, again!

Of course the NHS won't get it, we haven't left yet.

B'stard Child

28,458 posts

247 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
///ajd said:
Fastdruid said:
B'stard Child said:
Oh and the NHS won't get 350m a day biglaugh sorry it won't
It never was going to. It's not even what the bus said (although admittedly it insinuated it). Although it's seems what plenty of remainers would have liked it to say.

If I'm honest I'm somewhat in awe of the person behind the bus. From a campaign POV it is amazing. Even now, 5 months after the result and people can't stop talking about it. From the colour to the wording that was blatantly wrong yet in it's wrongness at best the argument could be made that it was still a lot of money. It was an absolute masterpiece.
Notoriety happens with spectacularly dishonest scams and other illegal behaviour, especially when promoted by serving elected officials.

It could be called bus-gate really.

44 years later and that is still a household name. Not really something to be proud of though.
You are comparing a "bus used in a referendum campaign" to "watergate"

Wow - just fking wow wow wow wow - if you don't know how silly that appears you are beyond help!!

sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
///ajd said:
Yes. Still a choice though. Our choice. Our choice as a sovereign state. British Parliaments choice.

Nothing to do with the EU.

"The EU made us have freedom of movement so we had no choice". Nonsense. Always our choice.

And look how well May did in reducing non-EU migration down to 10,000 or whatever it was supposed to be. Didn't get the number down much, did she? Now why do we think that was?

Turns out migration works for this country - but shhhhhhh! - we're not allowed to say so or we might lose some votes!
Some migration works. But not all, hence controlling immigration makes sense.

HTH



Edited by sidicks on Tuesday 29th November 23:32

B'stard Child

28,458 posts

247 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
sidicks said:
///ajd said:
Yes. Still a choice though. Our choice. Our choice as a sovereign state. British Parliaments choice.

Nothing to do with the EU.

"The EU made us have freedom of movement so we had no choice". Nonsense. Always our choice.

And look how well May did in reducing non-EU migration down to 10,000 or whatever it was supposed to be. Didn't get the number down much, did she? Now why do we think that was?

Turns out migration works for this country - but shhhhhhh! - we're not allowed to say so or we might lose some votes!
Some migration works. But not all, hence controlling immigration makes sense.

HTH
Wow finally some sense from ///ajd

Edited to add correction - if something looks to good to be true it probably is

idea Like a bus with 350m on the side jester


Edited by B'stard Child on Tuesday 29th November 23:44

alfie2244

11,292 posts

189 months

Tuesday 29th November 2016
quotequote all
B'stard Child said:
sidicks said:
///ajd said:
Yes. Still a choice though. Our choice. Our choice as a sovereign state. British Parliaments choice.

Nothing to do with the EU.

"The EU made us have freedom of movement so we had no choice". Nonsense. Always our choice.

And look how well May did in reducing non-EU migration down to 10,000 or whatever it was supposed to be. Didn't get the number down much, did she? Now why do we think that was?

Turns out migration works for this country - but shhhhhhh! - we're not allowed to say so or we might lose some votes!

Some migration works. But not all, hence controlling immigration makes sense.

HTH
Wow finally some sense from ///ajd
There will be a catch, a twist or an absolute denial at some point you mark my words biggrin