Could UK U-turn on Referendum Result (Vol 2)
Discussion
johnxjsc1985 said:
///ajd said:
UKIPs only MP eyes up his favourite new trading partner - the perfect untapped market, no risk of immigrants!
I wouldn't laugh at UKIP too much with 4 million voters last time and a Labour Party in Brexit denial it wouldn't take too many more votes for them to get a sizeable representation in Westminster and the more the MP's look like cowards because they want someone to tell them which side of the fence to sit on the more UKIP will grow.Sure they might take over the country and ruin it, but I'll still laugh at them - until they ban laughing at them.
Not a policy I would put past them of course.
jsf said:
Anna Soubry looked like her head was about to explode on Newsnight post the vote. She looks on the brink of a breakdown.
I watched the debate in the HoC earlier today, Soubry was like a demented witch at times, if she'd have had a broomstick she would have taken off!Farron has already gone in to meltdown, check out his Twitter page, it's hilarious
///ajd said:
I'll laugh at them all day long thanks.
Sure they might take over the country and ruin it, but I'll still laugh at them - until they ban laughing at them.
Not a policy I would put past them of course.
I love how you try to disguise your grief and angst with smilies. I can't wait to see what you'll be like after Brexit. Sure they might take over the country and ruin it, but I'll still laugh at them - until they ban laughing at them.
Not a policy I would put past them of course.
You're going to end up making yourself ill if you're not careful.
bmw535i said:
///ajd said:
more drivel
I love how you try to disguise your grief and angst with smilies. I can't wait to see what you'll be like after Brexit. You're going to end up making yourself ill if you're not careful.
Edited by alfie2244 on Wednesday 7th December 23:29
WATCH: The onslaught continues as Jacob Rees-Mogg accuses Remoaners of "rejecting our employers, bosses, liege lords - the British people." https://t.co/vL9A2Kv5RD
///ajd said:
More desperation from the desperate!All that jazz said:
don'tbesilly said:
Brexit is Brexit.
Was that ///ajd I saw balanced on the edge of the bridge over the M62 at Scammonden Dam earlier?
Labour have forced the Govt to agree to reveal the Brexit plan, before any action is taken in respect of a50. The Govt tried to call their bluff by adding an amendment to state that MPs accept the timetable for triggering article 50.
This is NOT a vote to trigger article 50.
If the Supreme Court uphold the earlier verdict this is likely to require a full act of parliament. Not a short cut act, but one dealing with the key issues.
So the process now looks to be:
1. Brexit Plan published and debated
2. Parliament vote on principle of triggering a50
3. Parliament debate legislation required
4. Brexit act voted on by both houses
5. After this passes into law, a50 can be triggered
The motion agreed today does not stop MP's from blocking a50 if they don't like the plan or adding amendments to any legislation if they think this is required.
I think we are finally on track for a sensible Brexit, where the focus is on the national interest rather than Govt survival. However, this still depends on the court decision.
///ajd said:
It was predictable what the content would be, but I thought what the hell, lets take a look. Yep, same old Guardian garbage.///ajd said:
It's the Grauniad! Hollered in the 'It's a puppet!' mode.
The only alarm bells are for the paper itself and the likes of those who read it.
How long before it dips below 150,000 circ.? Not long. Just 5 years ago it was double this figure.
Elysium said:
You do realise that this vote is essentially about tearing a massive hole in Theresa May's secretive 'Brexit means Brexit' approach ?
Labour have forced the Govt to agree to reveal the Brexit plan, before any action is taken in respect of a50. The Govt tried to call their bluff by adding an amendment to state that MPs accept the timetable for triggering article 50.
This is NOT a vote to trigger article 50.
If the Supreme Court uphold the earlier verdict this is likely to require a full act of parliament. Not a short cut act, but one dealing with the key issues.
So the process now looks to be:
1. Brexit Plan published and debated
2. Parliament vote on principle of triggering a50
3. Parliament debate legislation required
4. Brexit act voted on by both houses
5. After this passes into law, a50 can be triggered
The motion agreed today does not stop MP's from blocking a50 if they don't like the plan or adding amendments to any legislation if they think this is required.
I think we are finally on track for a sensible Brexit, where the focus is on the national interest rather than Govt survival. However, this still depends on the court decision.
keep on hanging on to that delusion if it makes you feel better.Labour have forced the Govt to agree to reveal the Brexit plan, before any action is taken in respect of a50. The Govt tried to call their bluff by adding an amendment to state that MPs accept the timetable for triggering article 50.
This is NOT a vote to trigger article 50.
If the Supreme Court uphold the earlier verdict this is likely to require a full act of parliament. Not a short cut act, but one dealing with the key issues.
So the process now looks to be:
1. Brexit Plan published and debated
2. Parliament vote on principle of triggering a50
3. Parliament debate legislation required
4. Brexit act voted on by both houses
5. After this passes into law, a50 can be triggered
The motion agreed today does not stop MP's from blocking a50 if they don't like the plan or adding amendments to any legislation if they think this is required.
I think we are finally on track for a sensible Brexit, where the focus is on the national interest rather than Govt survival. However, this still depends on the court decision.
FiF said:
WATCH: The onslaught continues as Jacob Rees-Mogg accuses Remoaners of "rejecting our employers, bosses, liege lords - the British people." https://t.co/vL9A2Kv5RD
Oh my word!jsf said:
Anna Soubry looked like her head was about to explode on Newsnight post the vote. She looks on the brink of a breakdown.
One of the few MPs with principles, representing her electorate . Good on Clarke too - history will prove he was correct.I wish my current MP would represent the wishes of her overwhelming remain constituency. However I fear Mrs May will betray us! Lost my vote for what it's worth after many years.
jsf said:
Elysium said:
You do realise that this vote is essentially about tearing a massive hole in Theresa May's secretive 'Brexit means Brexit' approach ?
Labour have forced the Govt to agree to reveal the Brexit plan, before any action is taken in respect of a50. The Govt tried to call their bluff by adding an amendment to state that MPs accept the timetable for triggering article 50.
This is NOT a vote to trigger article 50.
If the Supreme Court uphold the earlier verdict this is likely to require a full act of parliament. Not a short cut act, but one dealing with the key issues.
So the process now looks to be:
1. Brexit Plan published and debated
2. Parliament vote on principle of triggering a50
3. Parliament debate legislation required
4. Brexit act voted on by both houses
5. After this passes into law, a50 can be triggered
The motion agreed today does not stop MP's from blocking a50 if they don't like the plan or adding amendments to any legislation if they think this is required.
I think we are finally on track for a sensible Brexit, where the focus is on the national interest rather than Govt survival. However, this still depends on the court decision.
keep on hanging on to that delusion if it makes you feel better.Labour have forced the Govt to agree to reveal the Brexit plan, before any action is taken in respect of a50. The Govt tried to call their bluff by adding an amendment to state that MPs accept the timetable for triggering article 50.
This is NOT a vote to trigger article 50.
If the Supreme Court uphold the earlier verdict this is likely to require a full act of parliament. Not a short cut act, but one dealing with the key issues.
So the process now looks to be:
1. Brexit Plan published and debated
2. Parliament vote on principle of triggering a50
3. Parliament debate legislation required
4. Brexit act voted on by both houses
5. After this passes into law, a50 can be triggered
The motion agreed today does not stop MP's from blocking a50 if they don't like the plan or adding amendments to any legislation if they think this is required.
I think we are finally on track for a sensible Brexit, where the focus is on the national interest rather than Govt survival. However, this still depends on the court decision.
Are you still hanging on for a "mental shotgun Brexit"?
The above sequence appears to match that reported in the literate press.
Jimboka said:
One of the few MPs with principles, representing her electorate . Good on Clarke too - history will prove he was correct.
I wish my current MP would represent the wishes of her overwhelming remain constituency. However I fear Mrs May will betray us! Lost my vote for what it's worth after many years.
You appear to be coming round to the idea that we're leaving?I wish my current MP would represent the wishes of her overwhelming remain constituency. However I fear Mrs May will betray us! Lost my vote for what it's worth after many years.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff