45th President of the United States, Donald Trump.
Discussion
minimoog said:
turbobloke said:
Or willing to go along with the dreck being broadcast because they're still in denial over the death of failed left-(il)liberalism.
The regularity with which you trot out this kind of gibberish mantra shows you to be just about the most obsessed person on PH. And you've the nerve to tell others they can't get over anything.You're an absolute freak.
La Liga said:
minimoog said:
turbobloke said:
Or willing to go along with the dreck being broadcast because they're still in denial over the death of failed left-(il)liberalism.
The regularity with which you trot out this kind of gibberish mantra shows you to be just about the most obsessed person on PH. And you've the nerve to tell others they can't get over anything.You're an absolute freak.
Edited by p1stonhead on Wednesday 18th January 08:43
Countdown said:
scherzkeks said:
I quoted Kissenger a few posts back in reference to Countdown's logic. I think that quote is appropriate again.
Did you? If so I can't see it anywhere. Probably because PH is biased. It's owned by Haymarket, see? Follow the money....p1stonhead said:
Anyone who likes their Presidents without sexual assault, mocking of disabled people or racism are 'Snowflakes' dont you know
That's nothing.Anyone who suggests on the Brexit thread that Brexit may not relaunch the British Empire and that not every single immigrant is a free-loading health tourist on benefits, is a bed-wetting loser.
Raygun said:
Stickyfinger said:
Block China imports to the USA (from Steel to little s
t plastic toys & t-shirts) and the place will starve.....China is stting itself economically
T-shirts are a good analogy at some of the things Don Trump is getting at with regard to keeping manufacturing at home, as a t-shirt collector back in the 80s and further back there were hundreds of US companies making good quality t-shirts, companies like Screen Stars, Hanes, Champion, Plymouth etc but any new t-shirt from the US today will probably be manufactured in Nicaagua or China, cheap and nasty and not helping the US economy at all.t plastic toys & t-shirts) and the place will starve.....China is stting itself economicallyp1stonhead said:
And...IF he now does it ?Do you think the USA has a significant internal market that would allow them the freedom to do it ?
Do you think China has such a market, one that would support its billions without falling apart like Russia has ?
Edited by Stickyfinger on Wednesday 18th January 08:57
Stickyfinger said:
p1stonhead said:
And...IF he now does it ?Do you think the USA has a significant internal market that would allow them the freedom to do it ?
If he had the integrity to 'make America great', he wouldnt have done it in the first place. Now he wants the brainwashed who voted for him to like him a bit, he wants to bring everything back to America!
Edited by p1stonhead on Wednesday 18th January 09:00
scherzkeks said:
Page 99. I figured you wouldn't get it.
Not at all. I "got" that, at least as far as it's possible to get any of your posts. I just wondered if you'd responded to my point about whether Politifact is still "biased liberal MSM" when it points out where HRC has lied? I'm guessing not.
scherzkeks said:
walm said:
scherzkeks said:
American Apparel still manufacture in the US.
Yes. And they're bankrupt.Another victim of globalism.
Stickyfinger said:
Still avoiding the questions then, I will ask again
Do you think the USA has a significant internal market that would allow them the freedom to do it ?
Do you think China has such a market, one that would support its billions without falling apart like Russia has ?
To do what?Do you think the USA has a significant internal market that would allow them the freedom to do it ?
Do you think China has such a market, one that would support its billions without falling apart like Russia has ?
Billions of what?
scherzkeks said:
Last I had heard, they were bought out and set to restructure. Looks like they are truly done as of early Jan.
Another victim of globalism.
Not at all.Another victim of globalism.
Victim of the rise of fast-fashion and having a sex-pest CEO didn't help either.
Oh and to complete the rather scary parallels, their "Made in America" promise was somewhat compromised when they had to fire the huge swathes of undocumented workers.
But sure, you stick to American Apparel being a shining example other clothing companies should seek to emulate.
walm said:
p1stonhead said:
Anyone who likes their Presidents without sexual assault, mocking of disabled people or racism are 'Snowflakes' dont you know
That's nothing.Anyone who suggests on the Brexit thread that Brexit may not relaunch the British Empire and that not every single immigrant is a free-loading health tourist on benefits, is a bed-wetting loser.
I don't think it will be a land of milk and honey but then I'm in the camp that the EU isn't working for all states (and in fact is a gravy train for the establishment)
Keep trying:
As your showing your disability this morning I will make it simple.
Do you think the USA has a significant internal market that would allow them the freedom to do block the massive amounts of imports and dumping of products funded by and produced by the Chinese state. ?
Do you think China has such a market, one that would support its billions of people without falling apart like Russia has ?
As your showing your disability this morning I will make it simple.
Do you think the USA has a significant internal market that would allow them the freedom to do block the massive amounts of imports and dumping of products funded by and produced by the Chinese state. ?
Do you think China has such a market, one that would support its billions of people without falling apart like Russia has ?
Countdown said:
scherzkeks said:
Page 99. I figured you wouldn't get it.
Not at all. I "got" that, at least as far as it's possible to get any of your posts. I just wondered if you'd responded to my point about whether Politifact is still "biased liberal MSM" when it points out where HRC has lied? I'm guessing not.
It's kind of like when Fox News plasters "fair and balanced" on the screen to reassure such highly skeptical, critical thinkers as yourself.
Stickyfinger said:
Keep trying:
As your showing your disability this morning I will make it simple.
Do you think the USA has a significant internal market that would allow them the freedom to do block the massive amounts of imports and dumping of products funded by and produced by the Chinese state. ?
Do you think China has such a market, one that would support its billions of people without falling apart like Russia has ?
Not sure how this relates to Trump's promises to bring everything back to the USA (are you as Trump would put it, a 'standard retard'?) when he himself is benefiting from the cheap labour but;As your showing your disability this morning I will make it simple.
Do you think the USA has a significant internal market that would allow them the freedom to do block the massive amounts of imports and dumping of products funded by and produced by the Chinese state. ?
Do you think China has such a market, one that would support its billions of people without falling apart like Russia has ?
No. The USA couldnt bring all manufacturing in house without being uncompetative on a global level.
No. Modern China would probably collapse without the worlds manufacturing going on there.
Edited by p1stonhead on Wednesday 18th January 09:21
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff