45th President of the United States, Donald Trump.
Discussion
desolate said:
Funkycoldribena said:
Why do you think?
I'd rather not try and second guess your thought process on this matter so would prefer it if you tried to explain yourself if you want to debate.Maybe on the specific abortion thread rather than this one.
dvs_dave said:
tommunster10 said:
It's this believing in sky pixes that worries me, this is why America can't ever be trusted to do anything, they are obsessed with trusting everything to 'God' and actually believe he looks over them...but only them and their allies...it's mental ..
Also Trump says he can eradicate ISIS totally.....and end terrorism... does anyone think he will?
He also said he'll be able to fix the gun crime in Chicago's ghettos in a week. Domestic urban terrorism that takes 1000's of lives every year and is rife in every US city. That NEEDS be his first priority before worrying about isis. And as for all that mumbo jumbo about god, it was just dropped in there to appease the very large contingent of bible bashing simpletons that voted for him.Also Trump says he can eradicate ISIS totally.....and end terrorism... does anyone think he will?
Edited by dvs_dave on Saturday 21st January 15:32
Nothing will really change, the world will go on with daily instances of death and destruction, terrorism, gun crimes etc etc. The poor will for the most part stay poor and down trodden, heavy industry will remain pretty much defunct in the towns in USA that have fallen into the abyss.
he's given himself the kind of job that if i were rich beyond my wildest dreams thanks to inheriting Daddys money I'd avoid like the plague. I can't help think with Donald that he's beyond happy to of won the Presidency, but less happy with the fact wining wasn't actually the hard part in retrospect. What a mammoth task, even by any politicians standards he's got a lot of promises to keep.
Lucas Ayde said:
Well, I for one think it's important to stress that the current herd of intolerant, whiny SJWs who profess to be 'liberal' are most certainly NOT liberal and bring shame on generally liberal minded people who have values of open-mindedness and respect for other views.
'Illiberal' is a very good way to mock them for both their intolerance and to draw attention to their gross misappropriation of the 'liberal' ethos, keep going turbobloke.
True enough'Illiberal' is a very good way to mock them for both their intolerance and to draw attention to their gross misappropriation of the 'liberal' ethos, keep going turbobloke.
Liberalism stood for freedom of speech and democracy, neither of which are much championed by those who call themselves "liberal" these days.
Lucas Ayde said:
Well, I for one think it's important to stress that the current herd of intolerant, whiny SJWs who profess to be 'liberal' are most certainly NOT liberal and bring shame on generally liberal minded people who have values of open-mindedness and respect for other views.
'Illiberal' is a very good way to mock them for both their intolerance and to draw attention to their gross misappropriation of the 'liberal' ethos, keep going turbobloke.
Interesting. So what about your whiny president? Do you think he's tolerant of any criticism? Does his twitter account reflect a gracious man with erudite responses or a pathetic child with a thin skin?'Illiberal' is a very good way to mock them for both their intolerance and to draw attention to their gross misappropriation of the 'liberal' ethos, keep going turbobloke.
Let me guess your response....
johnxjsc1985 said:
fairly sure Michael Moore is suggesting Trump will be assassinated within 4 to 5 months. These peace loving liberals are quite nasty aren't they.
You're fairly sure? Oh well that's chapter and verse. And the alt right are such lovely people as are the KKK. Your new found political brothers.JagLover said:
True enough
Liberalism stood for freedom of speech and democracy, neither of which are much championed by those who call themselves "liberal" these days.
I would say that they're more fascist in their intolerance. They certainly are not liberal in any form!Liberalism stood for freedom of speech and democracy, neither of which are much championed by those who call themselves "liberal" these days.
I think that perhaps part of the problem is that they have had it all their own way for so long, belittling others who hold different views is unfathomable to them. The ideological pendulum swung way too far for the left, and now we are witnessing a correction. I just hope it doesn't swing too far the other way.
968 said:
Interesting. So what about your whiny president? Do you think he's tolerant of any criticism? Does his twitter account reflect a gracious man with erudite responses or a pathetic child with a thin skin?
Let me guess your response....
Well your PH one does not for sure....full of snide nasty little comments and digs but you claim the high groundLet me guess your response....
LOL
chris watton said:
JagLover said:
True enough
Liberalism stood for freedom of speech and democracy, neither of which are much championed by those who call themselves "liberal" these days.
I would say that they're more fascist in their intolerance. They certainly are not liberal in any form!Liberalism stood for freedom of speech and democracy, neither of which are much championed by those who call themselves "liberal" these days.
I think that perhaps part of the problem is that they have had it all their own way for so long, belittling others who hold different views is unfathomable to them. The ideological pendulum swung way too far for the left, and now we are witnessing a correction. I just hope it doesn't swing too far the other way.
'Tis funny seeing grown adults screaming and crying like kids.
Stickyfinger said:
Well your PH one does not for sure....full of snide nasty little comments and digs but you claim the high ground
LOL
No just observing your rank hypocrisy. On the one hand supportive of a narcissist with an incredibly thin skin and preponderance to embarrassingly histrionic responses, on the other claiming his opponents are intolerant, over sensitivity be and whiny. It's very funny really. You seem to be similarly thin skinned. Why not take to twitter to say how unfair it is??LOL
968 said:
No just observing your rank hypocrisy. On the one hand supportive of a narcissist with an incredibly thin skin and preponderance to embarrassingly histrionic responses, on the other claiming his opponents are intolerant, over sensitivity be and whiny. It's very funny really. You seem to be similarly thin skinned. Why not take to twitter to say how unfair it is??
Please show me where I said I liked him or thought he was anything other than dreadful......I have said he was the one who offered a choice/alternate option to the US voter rather than the same old s
t that H Clinton has. A choice that may or may not work.Really, you do conform to type.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff