45th President of the United States, Donald Trump.
Discussion
AreOut said:
if attendance numbers at his inauguration will be the biggest problem during his presidency then we are good to go
Well quite. And you'd think then that Spicer wouldn't have made such a big deal out of it and Conway would've not tried to create an alternate reality to explain his comments.Ok for a second let's give him the benefit of the doubt going forward, but why would he do such a thing on his very first day? Wouldn't he have hundreds of people begging him not to? No advisors got through to him?!
I don't see how he thought he could just try and tell people their eyes were not working when the whole world saw it?
It's genuinely baffling.
I don't see how he thought he could just try and tell people their eyes were not working when the whole world saw it?
It's genuinely baffling.
citizensm1th said:
B'stard Child said:
citizensm1th said:
Hahahahah highly unlikely (just to clarify for the trumpists the carrot topped blunder boy will not make america great again nor will it be beautiful,wonderful or super)
I struggle to understand how anyone can make the only true world super power and arguably the richest nation on earth great again?
maybe if trump stops the top one percent sucking up all the profit the ordinary forgotten american might think its beautiful chances of that happening ..... well don4l has a better chance of achieving man powered flight.
WOW.....I struggle to understand how anyone can make the only true world super power and arguably the richest nation on earth great again?
maybe if trump stops the top one percent sucking up all the profit the ordinary forgotten american might think its beautiful chances of that happening ..... well don4l has a better chance of achieving man powered flight.
Apart from the missing capitalisation of America on two occasions - It's a really odd day!
968 said:
Well quite. And you'd think then that Spicer wouldn't have made such a big deal out of it and Conway would've not tried to create an alternate reality to explain his comments.
His eyes saw thisA BIG fking crowd no matter what the number. Personally I would be proud as punch if that were me.
Big press fk up afterwards no question.
(and to think, all those people are retarded bigots, racists, KKK members, all white and sexual perverts, who would of thunk it !)
Edited by Stickyfinger on Sunday 22 January 21:56
I've explained this earlier, only to be attacked for making the point.
He is clearly trying to set the ground rules for how the media cover his presidency, where if he sees them misrepresenting the facts, he will take them to task.
That is no me commenting on what the facts are, that's me explaining his mind set.
The Press have done themselves no favours in the last few years, they constantly tell lies or half truths, which has left them exposed to what we see now.
My hope is that real journalism is rejuvenated as a result of this mess.
He is clearly trying to set the ground rules for how the media cover his presidency, where if he sees them misrepresenting the facts, he will take them to task.
That is no me commenting on what the facts are, that's me explaining his mind set.
The Press have done themselves no favours in the last few years, they constantly tell lies or half truths, which has left them exposed to what we see now.
My hope is that real journalism is rejuvenated as a result of this mess.
Dr Murdoch said:
Trouble is, if he says they're bull-stting, thats true.
He's arranged it that any criticism must be viewed as a conspiracy.
So he won't be challenged by the media when he cocks up. Quite frightening...
That's why they must do their job properly and professionally.He's arranged it that any criticism must be viewed as a conspiracy.
So he won't be challenged by the media when he cocks up. Quite frightening...
If they don't, then he will tear them to pieces and not be accountable.
Its up to the Press to up their game.
rscott said:
Stickyfinger said:
Er, 0/10 for reading comprehension. Newsweek pulled the image FROM a live feed - it's a screen capture.They didn't pull it from their website.
Edited by p1stonhead on Sunday 22 January 22:06
minimoog said:
scherzkeks said:
I am cynical
You really aren't. Bizarre how you pretend to temper your evangelism like this.The fact that you think I am a Trump supporter is also no surprise. Snowflakes are a binary folk.
Edited by scherzkeks on Sunday 22 January 22:10
KTF said:
Trump makes a lot of noise but if he doesn't deliver he is going to be ripped apart. The next 4 years are going to be a fun ride.
Funny that people are getting all excited about politicians manipulating things to suit their agenda. Like that is news...
Well he's got two years before he gets congratulated or smacked in the nose.Funny that people are getting all excited about politicians manipulating things to suit their agenda. Like that is news...
jsf said:
I've explained this earlier, only to be attacked for making the point.
He is clearly trying to set the ground rules for how the media cover his presidency, where if he sees them misrepresenting the facts, he will take them to task.
That is no me commenting on what the facts are, that's me explaining his mind set.
The Press have done themselves no favours in the last few years, they constantly tell lies or half truths, which has left them exposed to what we see now.
My hope is that real journalism is rejuvenated as a result of this mess.
Except they didn't misrepresent the facts. They presented the facts contrary to the outright lies he published. As Dr Murdoch has said above any deviation from the party line is viewed as a conspiracy. I guess he's learning pretty quickly from Putin how to run an authoritarian regime.He is clearly trying to set the ground rules for how the media cover his presidency, where if he sees them misrepresenting the facts, he will take them to task.
That is no me commenting on what the facts are, that's me explaining his mind set.
The Press have done themselves no favours in the last few years, they constantly tell lies or half truths, which has left them exposed to what we see now.
My hope is that real journalism is rejuvenated as a result of this mess.
968 said:
jsf said:
I've explained this earlier, only to be attacked for making the point.
He is clearly trying to set the ground rules for how the media cover his presidency, where if he sees them misrepresenting the facts, he will take them to task.
That is no me commenting on what the facts are, that's me explaining his mind set.
The Press have done themselves no favours in the last few years, they constantly tell lies or half truths, which has left them exposed to what we see now.
My hope is that real journalism is rejuvenated as a result of this mess.
Except they didn't misrepresent the facts. They presented the facts contrary to the outright lies he published. As Paddy has said above any deviation from the party line is viewed as a conspiracy. I guess he's learning pretty quickly from Putin how to run an authoritarian regime.He is clearly trying to set the ground rules for how the media cover his presidency, where if he sees them misrepresenting the facts, he will take them to task.
That is no me commenting on what the facts are, that's me explaining his mind set.
The Press have done themselves no favours in the last few years, they constantly tell lies or half truths, which has left them exposed to what we see now.
My hope is that real journalism is rejuvenated as a result of this mess.
968 said:
jsf said:
I've explained this earlier, only to be attacked for making the point.
He is clearly trying to set the ground rules for how the media cover his presidency, where if he sees them misrepresenting the facts, he will take them to task.
That is no me commenting on what the facts are, that's me explaining his mind set.
The Press have done themselves no favours in the last few years, they constantly tell lies or half truths, which has left them exposed to what we see now.
My hope is that real journalism is rejuvenated as a result of this mess.
Except they didn't misrepresent the facts. They presented the facts contrary to the outright lies he published. As Dr Murdoch has said above any deviation from the party line is viewed as a conspiracy. I guess he's learning pretty quickly from Putin how to run an authoritarian regime.He is clearly trying to set the ground rules for how the media cover his presidency, where if he sees them misrepresenting the facts, he will take them to task.
That is no me commenting on what the facts are, that's me explaining his mind set.
The Press have done themselves no favours in the last few years, they constantly tell lies or half truths, which has left them exposed to what we see now.
My hope is that real journalism is rejuvenated as a result of this mess.
jsf said:
968 said:
jsf said:
I've explained this earlier, only to be attacked for making the point.
He is clearly trying to set the ground rules for how the media cover his presidency, where if he sees them misrepresenting the facts, he will take them to task.
That is no me commenting on what the facts are, that's me explaining his mind set.
The Press have done themselves no favours in the last few years, they constantly tell lies or half truths, which has left them exposed to what we see now.
My hope is that real journalism is rejuvenated as a result of this mess.
Except they didn't misrepresent the facts. They presented the facts contrary to the outright lies he published. As Dr Murdoch has said above any deviation from the party line is viewed as a conspiracy. I guess he's learning pretty quickly from Putin how to run an authoritarian regime.He is clearly trying to set the ground rules for how the media cover his presidency, where if he sees them misrepresenting the facts, he will take them to task.
That is no me commenting on what the facts are, that's me explaining his mind set.
The Press have done themselves no favours in the last few years, they constantly tell lies or half truths, which has left them exposed to what we see now.
My hope is that real journalism is rejuvenated as a result of this mess.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff