45th President of the United States, Donald Trump.
Discussion
alfie2244 said:
B'stard Child said:
Funkycoldribena said:
B'stard Child said:
Can we talk about Spicer here or do we need to start a separate thread?
You've reached your limit for today.
scherzkeks said:
don4l said:
vonuber said:
walm said:
He's going to house all the unwanted babies in Trump Tower.
It will be wonderful.
Don't worry.
It Would be funny if it wasn't so sad. But I want to hear our favourite climate change denier his opinion (I'm convinced him and don4l are the same person It will be wonderful.
Don't worry.
).Edited by don4l on Monday 23 January 18:41
More than 4 mistakes too. As Trump would say: Sad!
I missed at least one.
Two short sentences with at least five mistakes.
That is 2.5 errors per well educated degree.
walm said:
KrissKross said:
Have I heard of google, are you 12, why do you try to wind people up like that, unnecessary really if you want to be take seriously.
Ok I just watched the video for the first time:
1. He explain that security/fences were erected at positions that were open in the past. Makes sense to me that maybe not so many people were allowed into the parts where photos were taken. Would that be reasonable in your view?
2. "This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period," Spicer said - Well I have never watched a presidential inauguration before on the TV, neither has my family. So maybe the overall audience numbers are higher even if not on site?
So whats your point again, and how is it going to help you and your families day to day lives, shouldn't that be all you really care about instead of all this petty tit for tat rubbish?
Fair enough on the unnecessary rudeness, apologies. It was just all over every media outlet (MSM, Fox and social) so I thought you would have seen it!!Ok I just watched the video for the first time:
1. He explain that security/fences were erected at positions that were open in the past. Makes sense to me that maybe not so many people were allowed into the parts where photos were taken. Would that be reasonable in your view?
2. "This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period," Spicer said - Well I have never watched a presidential inauguration before on the TV, neither has my family. So maybe the overall audience numbers are higher even if not on site?
So whats your point again, and how is it going to help you and your families day to day lives, shouldn't that be all you really care about instead of all this petty tit for tat rubbish?
You missed the all important "in person" part of his quote.
And of course hopefully it won't impact my family's life (although any thoughts of emigrating back to the US are now dashed - god knows what he's going to do to the H1B-Visa program).
But what I find so astonishing is that this is a press secretary BLATANTLY lying about an irrelevant fact.
It just doesn't bode well for a well-run, level-headed administration.
And for that the whole world should worry, IMHO!
Honestly, it is a massive red flag to anyone who was desperately hoping Trump would tone it down once in office.
No chance!!!
By the way one of my only news sources is PH and a bit of social media. I don't watch much TV and haven't read a paper for 10+ years.
I try to remain impartial where I can but must say that if the main focus is who showed up to what party then clearly there is not much serious to complain about in the world?
CooperS said:
JeremyH5 said:
Regulation to be cut by 75% but maintain key safety points, taxes on middle class and business to be cut by 10%.
Go Donald!
Are you listening, Theresa?
Central and regional public sector cost has been stifling economic performance for decades. Bring it on.
About f
king time.
All well and good but in the immediate future how does America even begin to afford that.Go Donald!
Are you listening, Theresa?
Central and regional public sector cost has been stifling economic performance for decades. Bring it on.
About f
king time.They will just add it to the $67 trillion US total debt pile and kick the can down the road for another 4 years.
Stop it!rscott said:
It's one thing for the media to exaggerate figures or even for a candidate to do so. It's quite another for the official Whitehouse press secretary to give out factually incorrect statements. Or should we allow them to invent GDP stats, unemployment figures etc and not challenge them.
I know many a businessperson behind closed doors that muster huge amounts of bravado and hot air after a few beers. However back in the real world are lovely kind and considerate people.Shouldn't we be interested in what he actually does rather than says, which is the opposite of most politicians I know these days.
fatboy18 said:
discusdave said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Man wearing "Make America Great again" cap, starting to make America great again by cleaning up all the crap left behind by the Washington Women's March - http://i.imgur.com/3mdkpAC.gifv
Filthy sexist misogynist taking a job that a woman could have.
968 said:
B'stard Child said:
Funkycoldribena said:
B'stard Child said:
Can we talk about Spicer here or do we need to start a separate thread?
You've reached your limit for today.I know FCR, when he says something he normally means it..........
Besides I've got an image of "She who must not be named three times in one page for the fear of Techiedave" furry muff being rotten and rusty used brillo pad - have you seen how messy an old used brillo pad makes when your try to part it - YUCK
B'stard Child said:
968 said:
B'stard Child said:
Funkycoldribena said:
B'stard Child said:
Can we talk about Spicer here or do we need to start a separate thread?
You've reached your limit for today.I know FCR, when he says something he normally means it..........
Besides I've got an image of "She who must not be named three times in one page for the fear of Techiedave" furry muff being rotten and rusty used brillo pad - have you seen how messy an old used brillo pad makes when your try to part it - YUCK
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff