Incident Croydon tram

Author
Discussion

Not-The-Messiah

3,620 posts

82 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
The sooner all teams and trains are driverless the better. Safer and far less likely to have stupid union stoppages every other week.

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

254 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
scenario8 said:
Asked in no way being obstructive. Not at all.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-411415...
I wonder if an extra 75p an hour might ease their way through this awful imposition?

80p?

What price the loss of one's freedom to sleep at the wheel? Call it an extra quid and we're golden.

KAgantua

3,883 posts

132 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
scenario8 said:
Asked in no way being obstructive. Not at all.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-411415...
I wonder if an extra 75p an hour might ease their way through this awful imposition?

80p?

What price the loss of one's freedom to sleep at the wheel? Call it an extra quid and we're golden.
Exactly.
They really are scum arent they?

Vipers

32,894 posts

229 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
KAgantua said:
SpeckledJim said:
scenario8 said:
Asked in no way being obstructive. Not at all.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-411415...
I wonder if an extra 75p an hour might ease their way through this awful imposition?

80p?

What price the loss of one's freedom to sleep at the wheel? Call it an extra quid and we're golden.
Exactly.
They really are scum arent they?
Tells me they often fall asleep, and dont want to get caught. Bunch of tards.

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Why has it come down to this?
Back earlier in the thread there was only one 20 sign (or whatever it was in kph) and which was easy to miss.
It looked like it was a track/signage layout fault
Was it Paddington Green where theyd positioned the red light where many drivers missed it, but it wasnt until there was a crash they thought about doing something about it.

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

254 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Why has it come down to this?
Back earlier in the thread there was only one 20 sign (or whatever it was in kph) and which was easy to miss.
It looked like it was a track/signage layout fault
Was it Paddington Green where theyd positioned the red light where many drivers missed it, but it wasnt until there was a crash they thought about doing something about it.
If a speed limit sign on your commute blows down overnight, do you crash the following morning?

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
saaby93 said:
Why has it come down to this?
Back earlier in the thread there was only one 20 sign (or whatever it was in kph) and which was easy to miss.
It looked like it was a track/signage layout fault
Was it Paddington Green where theyd positioned the red light where many drivers missed it, but it wasnt until there was a crash they thought about doing something about it.
If a speed limit sign on your commute blows down overnight, do you crash the following morning?
It's a bit different in a tram
You cant really tell the lie of the tracks and use the speed limit signs to tell you to anchor up for a particular bend
Who'd have thought theyd put a 20mph bend on the output of a full speed stretch through a tunnel?
If it was a road you'd have all sorts of hazard markings if they did, its not as if you can take a different line through the bend on a tram


Chrisgr31

13,485 posts

256 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Yes, no doubt about it. If the devise was there merely to warn the driver they were falling asleep and wake them up I suspect the unions and staff would have no issue. However no doubt it will be used as a management tool and this is why they don't want it. I doubt the staff and union want to be fighting against something that they know the public will think is good.

alangla

4,821 posts

182 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
It's a bit different in a tram
You cant really tell the lie of the tracks and use the speed limit signs to tell you to anchor up for a particular bend
Who'd have thought theyd put a 20mph bend on the output of a full speed stretch through a tunnel?
If it was a road you'd have all sorts of hazard markings if they did, its not as if you can take a different line through the bend on a tram
If it's anything like the mainline railways, they should know every single detail of the line and be able to drive the whole thing with very few visual cues. Things like a speed restriction for a sharp bend after a particular tunnel are the sorts of details that would stick in your head.

fido

16,801 posts

256 months

Monday 4th September 2017
quotequote all
The trams already have GPS devices - so the next step could be to fit speed limiters that automatically brake if the tram hits a section above a certain speed. This would have the added benefit of giving some clues as to where drivers are dozing off.

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

124 months

Murph7355

37,757 posts

257 months

Thursday 2nd November 2017
quotequote all
The sooner these and the tubes are automated the better.

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Thursday 2nd November 2017
quotequote all
alangla said:
saaby93 said:
It's a bit different in a tram
You cant really tell the lie of the tracks and use the speed limit signs to tell you to anchor up for a particular bend
Who'd have thought theyd put a 20mph bend on the output of a full speed stretch through a tunnel?
If it was a road you'd have all sorts of hazard markings if they did, its not as if you can take a different line through the bend on a tram
If it's anything like the mainline railways, they should know every single detail of the line and be able to drive the whole thing with very few visual cues. Things like a speed restriction for a sharp bend after a particular tunnel are the sorts of details that would stick in your head.
and if you make a mistake one day?

Megaflow

9,438 posts

226 months

Thursday 2nd November 2017
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
I hate to point this out to Mr Workshy Union leader, but sunlight is also inferred. I suggest if the drivers can't drive due to infrared light, they shouldn't be driving at all.

Tossers.

AyBee

10,536 posts

203 months

Thursday 2nd November 2017
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
The sooner these and the tubes are automated the better.
This yes They usually strike on the basis of "safety of passengers", like removing staff from tube ticket halls, and then when something is brought in for the safety of passengers, they strike again confused

turbomoped

4,180 posts

84 months

Thursday 2nd November 2017
quotequote all
i cant figure out how they seem to be all can do about the massive compexity of a driverless car appearing on our roads
but the simple driverless train is frowned upon.
Its on flippin rails and nothing is approaching for any other angle ffs.

alangla

4,821 posts

182 months

Thursday 2nd November 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
alangla said:
saaby93 said:
It's a bit different in a tram
You cant really tell the lie of the tracks and use the speed limit signs to tell you to anchor up for a particular bend
Who'd have thought theyd put a 20mph bend on the output of a full speed stretch through a tunnel?
If it was a road you'd have all sorts of hazard markings if they did, its not as if you can take a different line through the bend on a tram
If it's anything like the mainline railways, they should know every single detail of the line and be able to drive the whole thing with very few visual cues. Things like a speed restriction for a sharp bend after a particular tunnel are the sorts of details that would stick in your head.
and if you make a mistake one day?
On the main line, you would probably get a warning from the old AWS system at the advanced warning board. This can be acknowledged and nothing will happen, regardless of whether the driver slows or not.

At some severe restrictions, there might be a TPWS setup which could detect the overspeed and stop the train, but this is by no means universal.

KTF

9,808 posts

151 months

Thursday 2nd November 2017
quotequote all
AyBee said:
This yes They usually strike on the basis of "safety of passengers", like removing staff from tube ticket halls, and then when something is brought in for the safety of passengers, they strike again confused
When they get more money their concerns will go away as usual.

turbomoped

4,180 posts

84 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I think you should still have a operative onboard in the cab with some sort of iris detector so they dont snooze the whole shift
but excluded from the driving for the most part.

Shakermaker

11,317 posts

101 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
This new "infrared sleep sensor" that the drivers are saying is causing them undue headaches etc, why was this brought in instead of the more traditional system that I am familiar with in other trains where you have to press a button every 15-20 seconds to prove you are not asleep? A bit more than the "dead man's handle" system which clearly, can still operate when you are asleep if you are holding on to it?