Make America Great Again
Discussion
rscott said:
MrBrightSi said:
marcosgt said:
True, Home sweet home...
Extremist, Supremacist, Bigot, Nazi, Psychopath - These are what we should be fighting against, not 'culture'...
M.
5oh IS ++UNGOOD!Extremist, Supremacist, Bigot, Nazi, Psychopath - These are what we should be fighting against, not 'culture'...
M.
The whole cliche American insults are boring too.
jjlynn27 said:
FN2TypeR said:
5ohmustang said:
Don't be scared, Khan of Londistan will save you, it's just to be expected living in a multicultural society.
Well you can keep it thanks.
This chap is fWell you can keep it thanks.
king mental, it's ace 
If he leaves it until after around 17:00 I probably won't even feel it
p1stonhead said:
rscott said:
MrBrightSi said:
marcosgt said:
True, Home sweet home...
Extremist, Supremacist, Bigot, Nazi, Psychopath - These are what we should be fighting against, not 'culture'...
M.
5oh IS ++UNGOOD!Extremist, Supremacist, Bigot, Nazi, Psychopath - These are what we should be fighting against, not 'culture'...
M.
The whole cliche American insults are boring too.
London/the UK/Western Europe is incredibly safe. Much safer than the 70s when the IRA and ETA were in full swing.
Terrorist attacks are extremely rare events and the chances of being unfortunate enough to be caught up in one is very very slim.
Carrying on about it in the news for days/weeks merely fuels the terrorists' desire for publicity.
Terrorist attacks are extremely rare events and the chances of being unfortunate enough to be caught up in one is very very slim.
Carrying on about it in the news for days/weeks merely fuels the terrorists' desire for publicity.
rscott said:
Yeah - I've met some of the team from our Arkansas office too. Yes, some are into guns, pickups, beer, etc but no one ever talks or writes about those things like he does.
I visit Houston fairly frequently for work and my colleagues there are pretty much the same as what you describe - although a good number of them are from out of state.There are a couple of good old gun totin', Rush Limbaugh lovin' Republicans in amongst the normal folk though, they're decent enough folk to deal with providing you stay away from their pet subjects (immigrations, guns, the usual suspects). One of them is from Alabama and he is a right hick, he reminds me of a Tom Lehrer song called "I wanna go back to Dixie".
I wanna talk wi' southern gentlemen, and put that white sheet on again, I ain't seen one good lyncin' in years!
Edited by FN2TypeR on Friday 24th March 13:05
Countdown said:
Custard.
Outside of muslim faith schools I can't think of any which offer Islamic Studies as a qualification at 6th form level. And unless you were thinking about being an Imam I cant imagine anybody (even muslims) wanting to do it. It's akin to doing RE at A-level.
ps I did "islamic Studies". I also went to Boys Brigade anybody remember them?). The impression i got from my relatively limited studies of Christianity and Islam were the striking similarities between both. They even have the same characters (Adam, Eve, Moses, Jesus.
New testament theology and Islamic Studies, no sOutside of muslim faith schools I can't think of any which offer Islamic Studies as a qualification at 6th form level. And unless you were thinking about being an Imam I cant imagine anybody (even muslims) wanting to do it. It's akin to doing RE at A-level.
ps I did "islamic Studies". I also went to Boys Brigade anybody remember them?). The impression i got from my relatively limited studies of Christianity and Islam were the striking similarities between both. They even have the same characters (Adam, Eve, Moses, Jesus.
Edited by Countdown on Friday 24th March 12:50
t. The similarities are because Islam is a straight up load of plagiarism anyhow. A bunch of Arabs wanting their turn at gods chosen people.
Shakermaker said:
Indeed. Context is important with exactly what he said (which he said after the bombs in New York, but were just retweeted this with by DJT Jr out of said context...)
Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism.
Which should lead us to:
Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism = increased security, either overt or covert, as well as increased preparedness for the outcome of an attack. Such as making sure hospitals have the capacity, there is a designated structure of who does what in an event of a serious attack.
So in London, we saw the outcome of that happen after an attack. Lots of people rushed in who were able to help, and the emergency services did what they could.
In the USA, and I am not entirely familiar with where you live 5oh but I recognise that Alabama is not the same as the middle of LA or NYC etc. However, the choice that has been made by the USA authorities include giving their police officers firearms, and in many cases, allowing private citizens the ability to carry around their own personal firearms.
I'd also expect that in the larger towns and cities, there's a hierarchy of people who take charge in such situations, and at what stage the various forces (local PD, EMTs/Paramedics, state police, FBI, National Guard etc etc) but in NYC or LA, there are more likely to be specially trained officers and officials who can deal with the "terrorism" aspect of the threat/outcome of the event.
That, is what Sadiq Khan was referring to in his interview in May last year. I find it hard to disagree with what he has said, but it was quickly spun out of context by those who seek to discredit him.
Khan of Londistan's comments "part and parcel of living in a city" are nothing more than words of accepting defeat to extremism. Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism.
Which should lead us to:
Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism = increased security, either overt or covert, as well as increased preparedness for the outcome of an attack. Such as making sure hospitals have the capacity, there is a designated structure of who does what in an event of a serious attack.
So in London, we saw the outcome of that happen after an attack. Lots of people rushed in who were able to help, and the emergency services did what they could.
In the USA, and I am not entirely familiar with where you live 5oh but I recognise that Alabama is not the same as the middle of LA or NYC etc. However, the choice that has been made by the USA authorities include giving their police officers firearms, and in many cases, allowing private citizens the ability to carry around their own personal firearms.
I'd also expect that in the larger towns and cities, there's a hierarchy of people who take charge in such situations, and at what stage the various forces (local PD, EMTs/Paramedics, state police, FBI, National Guard etc etc) but in NYC or LA, there are more likely to be specially trained officers and officials who can deal with the "terrorism" aspect of the threat/outcome of the event.
That, is what Sadiq Khan was referring to in his interview in May last year. I find it hard to disagree with what he has said, but it was quickly spun out of context by those who seek to discredit him.
In that same article he offered no real solutions. Just the usual spiel, see something say something, solidarity etc, to which has the same results as Facebook filters and hashtags.
For a mayor to come out and say we need to accept this potential risk because we're a bigger target than say a small town is unacceptable and toxic leadership. It took him 5 hours to appear on camera?
While I understand what you are saying, I did not see that same message in The Independent article at all.
Khan associates himself with the globalists and the Clinton Cult. He refuses to let go of the collapsing European Union and opts for open borders, pissing on any resemblance of British sovereignty.
Eitherway I hope the fallen rest in peace and their families, words will not help, it's beyond words. I have lost 2 of my friends to Jihadists, it's something you will never recover from.
For those that helped, they should be honoured.
It was a cowardly, dispicable act, if investigations prove family members had prior knowledge of the attack, they should be stripped of citizenship and deported.
5ohmustang said:
Shakermaker said:
Indeed. Context is important with exactly what he said (which he said after the bombs in New York, but were just retweeted this with by DJT Jr out of said context...)
Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism.
Which should lead us to:
Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism = increased security, either overt or covert, as well as increased preparedness for the outcome of an attack. Such as making sure hospitals have the capacity, there is a designated structure of who does what in an event of a serious attack.
So in London, we saw the outcome of that happen after an attack. Lots of people rushed in who were able to help, and the emergency services did what they could.
In the USA, and I am not entirely familiar with where you live 5oh but I recognise that Alabama is not the same as the middle of LA or NYC etc. However, the choice that has been made by the USA authorities include giving their police officers firearms, and in many cases, allowing private citizens the ability to carry around their own personal firearms.
I'd also expect that in the larger towns and cities, there's a hierarchy of people who take charge in such situations, and at what stage the various forces (local PD, EMTs/Paramedics, state police, FBI, National Guard etc etc) but in NYC or LA, there are more likely to be specially trained officers and officials who can deal with the "terrorism" aspect of the threat/outcome of the event.
That, is what Sadiq Khan was referring to in his interview in May last year. I find it hard to disagree with what he has said, but it was quickly spun out of context by those who seek to discredit him.
Khan of Londistan's comments "part and parcel of living in a city" are nothing more than words of accepting defeat to extremism. Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism.
Which should lead us to:
Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism = increased security, either overt or covert, as well as increased preparedness for the outcome of an attack. Such as making sure hospitals have the capacity, there is a designated structure of who does what in an event of a serious attack.
So in London, we saw the outcome of that happen after an attack. Lots of people rushed in who were able to help, and the emergency services did what they could.
In the USA, and I am not entirely familiar with where you live 5oh but I recognise that Alabama is not the same as the middle of LA or NYC etc. However, the choice that has been made by the USA authorities include giving their police officers firearms, and in many cases, allowing private citizens the ability to carry around their own personal firearms.
I'd also expect that in the larger towns and cities, there's a hierarchy of people who take charge in such situations, and at what stage the various forces (local PD, EMTs/Paramedics, state police, FBI, National Guard etc etc) but in NYC or LA, there are more likely to be specially trained officers and officials who can deal with the "terrorism" aspect of the threat/outcome of the event.
That, is what Sadiq Khan was referring to in his interview in May last year. I find it hard to disagree with what he has said, but it was quickly spun out of context by those who seek to discredit him.
In that same article he offered no real solutions. Just the usual spiel, see something say something, solidarity etc, to which has the same results as Facebook filters and hashtags.
For a mayor to come out and say we need to accept this potential risk because we're a bigger target than say a small town is unacceptable and toxic leadership. It took him 5 hours to appear on camera?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sad...
Edited by p1stonhead on Friday 24th March 13:28
tommunster10 said:
It may sound crazy to say this on PH but i want to live in a world where I see pictures of the Paramedics trying to save the life of the Terrorist. I only realised that when I thought about it for more than the first 30 secs of "why try to save him!!".
Point is the Paramedics job is to save a life...that is humanity right there! the good side...I want to live in that world with those people...and we do, though it doesn't always seem like it, live like that in the UK...
I am proud as a German to call England home.
If ever someone gathered up enough support to actually start wiping out Muslims and non whites, you'd not be left with utopia..you'd be left with the kind of people that could do such a thing..to anyone.
As a German... I think you get my point..
You want to live in a world where you see pictures of paramedics try to save the lives of terrorists? Point is the Paramedics job is to save a life...that is humanity right there! the good side...I want to live in that world with those people...and we do, though it doesn't always seem like it, live like that in the UK...
I am proud as a German to call England home.
If ever someone gathered up enough support to actually start wiping out Muslims and non whites, you'd not be left with utopia..you'd be left with the kind of people that could do such a thing..to anyone.
As a German... I think you get my point..
I want to live in a world where every blood thirsty terrorist is thirty mike miked to the face.
5ohmustang said:
Khan of Londistan's comments "part and parcel of living in a city" are nothing more than words of accepting defeat to extremism.
In that same article he offered no real solutions. Just the usual spiel, see something say something, solidarity etc, to which has the same results as Facebook filters and hashtags.
For a mayor to come out and say we need to accept this potential risk because we're a bigger target than say a small town is unacceptable and toxic leadership. It took him 5 hours to appear on camera?
While I understand what you are saying, I did not see that same message in The Independent article at all.
Khan associates himself with the globalists and the Clinton Cult. He refuses to let go of the collapsing European Union and opts for open borders, pissing on any resemblance of British sovereignty.
Eitherway I hope the fallen rest in peace and their families, words will not help, it's beyond words. I have lost 2 of my friends to Jihadists, it's something you will never recover from.
For those that helped, they should be honoured.
It was a cowardly, dispicable act, if investigations prove family members had prior knowledge of the attack, they should be stripped of citizenship and deported.
Leaving aside the potential illegality of stripping a person of citizenship, where do you deport them to? "Excuse me, do you mind if we land a plane in your country and push these people out of the door then take off again?"In that same article he offered no real solutions. Just the usual spiel, see something say something, solidarity etc, to which has the same results as Facebook filters and hashtags.
For a mayor to come out and say we need to accept this potential risk because we're a bigger target than say a small town is unacceptable and toxic leadership. It took him 5 hours to appear on camera?
While I understand what you are saying, I did not see that same message in The Independent article at all.
Khan associates himself with the globalists and the Clinton Cult. He refuses to let go of the collapsing European Union and opts for open borders, pissing on any resemblance of British sovereignty.
Eitherway I hope the fallen rest in peace and their families, words will not help, it's beyond words. I have lost 2 of my friends to Jihadists, it's something you will never recover from.
For those that helped, they should be honoured.
It was a cowardly, dispicable act, if investigations prove family members had prior knowledge of the attack, they should be stripped of citizenship and deported.
5ohmustang said:
Khan of Londistan's comments "part and parcel of living in a city" are nothing more than words of accepting defeat to extremism.
In that same article he offered no real solutions. Just the usual spiel, see something say something, solidarity etc, to which has the same results as Facebook filters and hashtags.
For a mayor to come out and say we need to accept this potential risk because we're a bigger target than say a small town is unacceptable and toxic leadership. It took him 5 hours to appear on camera?
While I understand what you are saying, I did not see that same message in The Independent article at all.
Khan associates himself with the globalists and the Clinton Cult. He refuses to let go of the collapsing European Union and opts for open borders, pissing on any resemblance of British sovereignty.
Eitherway I hope the fallen rest in peace and their families, words will not help, it's beyond words. I have lost 2 of my friends to Jihadists, it's something you will never recover from.
For those that helped, they should be honoured.
It was a cowardly, dispicable act, if investigations prove family members had prior knowledge of the attack, they should be stripped of citizenship and deported.
You are, genuinely, intellectually sub-normal. You don't have the capability to understand, in order to engage in discussion.In that same article he offered no real solutions. Just the usual spiel, see something say something, solidarity etc, to which has the same results as Facebook filters and hashtags.
For a mayor to come out and say we need to accept this potential risk because we're a bigger target than say a small town is unacceptable and toxic leadership. It took him 5 hours to appear on camera?
While I understand what you are saying, I did not see that same message in The Independent article at all.
Khan associates himself with the globalists and the Clinton Cult. He refuses to let go of the collapsing European Union and opts for open borders, pissing on any resemblance of British sovereignty.
Eitherway I hope the fallen rest in peace and their families, words will not help, it's beyond words. I have lost 2 of my friends to Jihadists, it's something you will never recover from.
For those that helped, they should be honoured.
It was a cowardly, dispicable act, if investigations prove family members had prior knowledge of the attack, they should be stripped of citizenship and deported.
And there you are, criticising us for being terrified - whilst pissing your pants in some mountain hut prepping for an Armageddon that'll never come.
5ohmustang said:
Khan of Londistan's comments "part and parcel of living in a city" are nothing more than words of accepting defeat to extremism.
In that same article he offered no real solutions. Just the usual spiel, see something say something, solidarity etc, to which has the same results as Facebook filters and hashtags.
For a mayor to come out and say we need to accept this potential risk because we're a bigger target than say a small town is unacceptable and toxic leadership. It took him 5 hours to appear on camera?
While I understand what you are saying, I did not see that same message in The Independent article at all.
Khan associates himself with the globalists and the Clinton Cult. He refuses to let go of the collapsing European Union and opts for open borders, pissing on any resemblance of British sovereignty.
Eitherway I hope the fallen rest in peace and their families, words will not help, it's beyond words. I have lost 2 of my friends to Jihadists, it's something you will never recover from.
For those that helped, they should be honoured.
It was a cowardly, dispicable act, if investigations prove family members had prior knowledge of the attack, they should be stripped of citizenship and deported.
And if they were born in the UK, where do you deport them to? In that same article he offered no real solutions. Just the usual spiel, see something say something, solidarity etc, to which has the same results as Facebook filters and hashtags.
For a mayor to come out and say we need to accept this potential risk because we're a bigger target than say a small town is unacceptable and toxic leadership. It took him 5 hours to appear on camera?
While I understand what you are saying, I did not see that same message in The Independent article at all.
Khan associates himself with the globalists and the Clinton Cult. He refuses to let go of the collapsing European Union and opts for open borders, pissing on any resemblance of British sovereignty.
Eitherway I hope the fallen rest in peace and their families, words will not help, it's beyond words. I have lost 2 of my friends to Jihadists, it's something you will never recover from.
For those that helped, they should be honoured.
It was a cowardly, dispicable act, if investigations prove family members had prior knowledge of the attack, they should be stripped of citizenship and deported.
As for your other verbal diarrhoea,
Khan's comment about it being 'part and parcel of living in a city' is completely true and something which could even be considered a good sign about London.
For a start, it means you're a target of the extremists - hence you can't be kowtowing to them and accepting their demands. If you were, then why would they be targeting you?
It's also nothing new - I grew up in a garrison town in the 1980s and we were the target of several IRA bombing attempts, including one which cost a soldier his legs. I then lived in central London from '89 to '92 , a somewhat busy time for the IRA. That was a far more dangerous time to be there than now, but not once did I think of moving or wanting our government to give in. I just accepted that was a risk we take for standing up for what we believe in.
iphonedyou said:
You are, genuinely, intellectually sub-normal. You don't have the capability to understand, in order to engage in discussion.
And there you are, criticising us for being terrified - whilst pissing your pants in some mountain hut prepping for an Armageddon that'll never come.
Armageddon? When did I say Armageddon? I said global financial collapse.And there you are, criticising us for being terrified - whilst pissing your pants in some mountain hut prepping for an Armageddon that'll never come.
I'm not worried about Armageddon, Killary lost the election she tried to rigg.
5ohmustang said:
Khan of Londistan's comments "part and parcel of living in a city" are nothing more than words of accepting defeat to extremism.
Well, only if you're illiterate, or have extremely poor comprehension of the written word.5ohmustang said:
In that same article he offered no real solutions.
For airy-fairy meaningless statements that is up there.5ohmustang said:
Just the usual spiel, see something say something, solidarity etc, to which has the same results as Facebook filters and hashtags.
Like #MakeAmericaGreatAgain ?5ohmustang said:
For a mayor to come out and say we need to accept this potential risk because we're a bigger target than say a small town is unacceptable and toxic leadership.
he didn't come out and say it now, he said it a while ago. DJT Junior didn't realise that because he is about as intelligent as his "Paw". However, as innumerable commentators have said, it's the truth. That's why mass shootings don't occur in the backwoods of Alabama or the swamps of Tennesee. There is nothing out there worth shooting. If you ARE going to commit a terrorist atrocity you attack large urban centres. It seems that the average terrorist is more intelligent thatn you, even one who drives a Hyundai. 5ohmustang said:
It took him 5 hours to appear on camera?
Obviously it would have been better, much better, if he had put on a red cap, with a meaningless slogan, squinted into the camera whilst pursing his lips, and said something vacuous, meaningless, and made up, Like Trumppy tends to do.5ohmustang said:
While I understand what you are saying,
I doubt that you understand much. In fact I'm continually surprised that you're able to switch on a PC.5ohmustang said:
Khan associates himself with the globalists and the Clinton Cult.
Does he bks. That's just your own mental image, without which your whole fantasy would fall apart.5ohmustang said:
He refuses to let go of the collapsing European Union and opts for open borders, pissing on any resemblance of British sovereignty.
Do you dribble while you fap? We live in a democarcy. he's entitled to his views as much as anybody else. Moreover he's an elected representative of Londoners, the majority of whom voted to remain.5ohmustang said:
Shakermaker said:
Indeed. Context is important with exactly what he said (which he said after the bombs in New York, but were just retweeted this with by DJT Jr out of said context...)
Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism.
Which should lead us to:
Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism = increased security, either overt or covert, as well as increased preparedness for the outcome of an attack. Such as making sure hospitals have the capacity, there is a designated structure of who does what in an event of a serious attack.
So in London, we saw the outcome of that happen after an attack. Lots of people rushed in who were able to help, and the emergency services did what they could.
In the USA, and I am not entirely familiar with where you live 5oh but I recognise that Alabama is not the same as the middle of LA or NYC etc. However, the choice that has been made by the USA authorities include giving their police officers firearms, and in many cases, allowing private citizens the ability to carry around their own personal firearms.
I'd also expect that in the larger towns and cities, there's a hierarchy of people who take charge in such situations, and at what stage the various forces (local PD, EMTs/Paramedics, state police, FBI, National Guard etc etc) but in NYC or LA, there are more likely to be specially trained officers and officials who can deal with the "terrorism" aspect of the threat/outcome of the event.
That, is what Sadiq Khan was referring to in his interview in May last year. I find it hard to disagree with what he has said, but it was quickly spun out of context by those who seek to discredit him.
Khan of Londistan's comments "part and parcel of living in a city" are nothing more than words of accepting defeat to extremism. Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism.
Which should lead us to:
Living in a big city = increased risk from terrorism = increased security, either overt or covert, as well as increased preparedness for the outcome of an attack. Such as making sure hospitals have the capacity, there is a designated structure of who does what in an event of a serious attack.
So in London, we saw the outcome of that happen after an attack. Lots of people rushed in who were able to help, and the emergency services did what they could.
In the USA, and I am not entirely familiar with where you live 5oh but I recognise that Alabama is not the same as the middle of LA or NYC etc. However, the choice that has been made by the USA authorities include giving their police officers firearms, and in many cases, allowing private citizens the ability to carry around their own personal firearms.
I'd also expect that in the larger towns and cities, there's a hierarchy of people who take charge in such situations, and at what stage the various forces (local PD, EMTs/Paramedics, state police, FBI, National Guard etc etc) but in NYC or LA, there are more likely to be specially trained officers and officials who can deal with the "terrorism" aspect of the threat/outcome of the event.
That, is what Sadiq Khan was referring to in his interview in May last year. I find it hard to disagree with what he has said, but it was quickly spun out of context by those who seek to discredit him.
In that same article he offered no real solutions. Just the usual spiel, see something say something, solidarity etc, to which has the same results as Facebook filters and hashtags.
For a mayor to come out and say we need to accept this potential risk because we're a bigger target than say a small town is unacceptable and toxic leadership. It took him 5 hours to appear on camera?
While I understand what you are saying, I did not see that same message in The Independent article at all.
Khan associates himself with the globalists and the Clinton Cult. He refuses to let go of the collapsing European Union and opts for open borders, pissing on any resemblance of British sovereignty.
Eitherway I hope the fallen rest in peace and their families, words will not help, it's beyond words. I have lost 2 of my friends to Jihadists, it's something you will never recover from.
For those that helped, they should be honoured.
It was a cowardly, dispicable act, if investigations prove family members had prior knowledge of the attack, they should be stripped of citizenship and deported.
There have been a lot of despicable acts of terror and I don't like any of them. You seem to be selective though. Bit like the American bars that used to have IRA collection buckets, but then of course terrorism was only invented after 9/11.
5ohmustang said:
tommunster10 said:
It may sound crazy to say this on PH but i want to live in a world where I see pictures of the Paramedics trying to save the life of the Terrorist. I only realised that when I thought about it for more than the first 30 secs of "why try to save him!!".
Point is the Paramedics job is to save a life...that is humanity right there! the good side...I want to live in that world with those people...and we do, though it doesn't always seem like it, live like that in the UK...
I am proud as a German to call England home.
If ever someone gathered up enough support to actually start wiping out Muslims and non whites, you'd not be left with utopia..you'd be left with the kind of people that could do such a thing..to anyone.
As a German... I think you get my point..
You want to live in a world where you see pictures of paramedics try to save the lives of terrorists? Point is the Paramedics job is to save a life...that is humanity right there! the good side...I want to live in that world with those people...and we do, though it doesn't always seem like it, live like that in the UK...
I am proud as a German to call England home.
If ever someone gathered up enough support to actually start wiping out Muslims and non whites, you'd not be left with utopia..you'd be left with the kind of people that could do such a thing..to anyone.
As a German... I think you get my point..
I want to live in a world where every blood thirsty terrorist is thirty mike miked to the face.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff