Snoopers Charter

[p1stonhead]

He was whoosh parroting for anyone who didnt read back a few pages

[jjlynn27]

p1stonhead said:

He was whoosh parroting for anyone who didnt read back a few pages

You'd think it would be obvious.

But joking aside, one of the reasons for voting remain for me was EU putting brakes on seemingly insatiable appetite of UK govt to collect data

[Camelot1971]

jjlynn27 said:

You'd think it would be obvious.

But joking aside, one of the reasons for voting remain for me was EU putting brakes on seemingly insatiable appetite of UK govt to collect data

Their appetite is nothing compared to Facebook etc. I find it faintly amusing that some people will kick off about UK Government collecting data and then upload all sorts of st onto Facebook!

There's no way I'll be giving financial data to a porn site.

[WinstonWolf]

jjlynn27 said:

Don't know what's big huppla about. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear. If this helps to defeat terrorists and other undesirables, all for it.

Yeah, if we stop terrorists looking at porn the world will be a safer place. Not...

[anonymous-user]

jjlynn27 said:

You'd think it would be obvious.

Only to someone that knows you. You used to hear that exact kind of language on terror threads all the time.

[pip t]

Camelot1971 said:

jjlynn27 said:

You'd think it would be obvious.

But joking aside, one of the reasons for voting remain for me was EU putting brakes on seemingly insatiable appetite of UK govt to collect data

Their appetite is nothing compared to Facebook etc. I find it faintly amusing that some people will kick off about UK Government collecting data and then upload all sorts of st onto Facebook!

There's no way I'll be giving financial data to a porn site.

The important difference is they've *chosen* to share with Facebook et al. You have no choice about having your data swept up by government agencies.

[amusingduck]

pip t said:

Camelot1971 said:

jjlynn27 said:

You'd think it would be obvious.

But joking aside, one of the reasons for voting remain for me was EU putting brakes on seemingly insatiable appetite of UK govt to collect data

Their appetite is nothing compared to Facebook etc. I find it faintly amusing that some people will kick off about UK Government collecting data and then upload all sorts of st onto Facebook!

There's no way I'll be giving financial data to a porn site.

The important difference is they've *chosen* to share with Facebook et al. You have no choice about having your data swept up by government agencies.

You think that the only data Facebook collect is restricted to your activity on their website?

If only

gizmodo said:

“Everything people do, either on Facebook directly or on sites that have a Facebook ‘Like’ button, reveals information about them to Facebook,” adds Schneier. “That’s an important point: Facebook tracks you even when you’re not on Facebook, because of their extensive surveillance network on sites that link to them.”

https://fieldguide.gizmodo.com/all-the-ways-facebook-tracks-you-that-you-might-not-kno-1795604150

[Sk00p]

pip t said:

The important difference is they've *chosen* to share with Facebook et al. You have no choice about having your data swept up by government agencies.

Sort of.. Facebook also collect lots of data about you and acquaintances that you aren't in control of. You don't even need to be a Facebooker.

[roachcoach]

I am just waiting for the day when an enterprising group of individuals uploads the entire internet history of all our MPs.

That'll sort this st out pretty quickly.

[SystemParanoia]

roachcoach said:

I am just waiting for the day when an enterprising group of individuals uploads the entire internet history of all our MPs.

That'll sort this st out pretty quickly.

wikileaks style..

great if the poor sod wants to live in a Bolivian embassy for the next 30 years

[Triumph Man]

WinstonWolf said:

jjlynn27 said:

Don't know what's big huppla about. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear. If this helps to defeat terrorists and other undesirables, all for it.

Yeah, if we stop terrorists looking at porn the world will be a safer place. Not...

Arguably allowing otherwise frustrated would-be terrorists to crank one out and relax will make the world a more peaceful place!

[Wobbegong]

Triumph Man said:

WinstonWolf said:

jjlynn27 said:

Don't know what's big huppla about. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear. If this helps to defeat terrorists and other undesirables, all for it.

Yeah, if we stop terrorists looking at porn the world will be a safer place. Not...

Arguably allowing otherwise frustrated would-be terrorists to crank one out and relax will make the world a more peaceful place!

[glazbagun]

Post-Brexit and if we leave the ECHR, we'll see how far they can push it. I'm guessing as far as they want as the general public seem almost as ignorant as our leaders.

[IroningMan]

glazbagun said:

Post-Brexit and if we leave the ECHR, we'll see how far they can push it. I'm guessing as far as they want as the general public seem almost as ignorant as our leaders.

Imagine a country in which Government policy on such matters is precisely aligned with the editorial slant of the Mail and you won't be far off.

[anonymous-user]

I remember watching this a couple of years ago - https://www.ted.com/talks/alessandro_acquisti_why_...

Impressive what they could do 5 years ago, I would imagine that it's far further along now.

One example was being able to create the first 5 digits of a US citizens SSN just from an anonymous photo - the inference of very private data from public data

[jjlynn27]

El stovey said:

jjlynn27 said:

You'd think it would be obvious.

Only to someone that knows you. You used to hear that exact kind of language on terror threads all the time.

I know, hence added the post with kebab shop. Cmon, that one had to be obvious.

(completely unrelated and before I forget; are pilots allowed to take photos from the cockpit during the flight?)

[anonymous-user]

jjlynn27 said:

El stovey said:

jjlynn27 said:

You'd think it would be obvious.

Only to someone that knows you. You used to hear that exact kind of language on terror threads all the time.

I know, hence added the post with kebab shop. Cmon, that one had to be obvious.

(completely unrelated and before I forget; are pilots allowed to take photos from the cockpit during the flight?)

It depends on the airline but I doubt any would be against taking photos in the cruise. Critical phases of flight like take off or landing then I expect the pilot might be expected to be concentrating on the job in hand.

Remote filming like a go pro might be different but again there may be rules about attaching it to windows etc and again about sharing it online.

But to answer your question there aren’t any rules (as far as I’m aware of) stopping people taking pictures generally but the airlines themselves may have rules about it and when you can take them and what you can do with them,

Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 16th January 19:05

[jjlynn27]

El stovey said:

It depends on the airline but I doubt any would be against taking photos in the cruise. Critical phases like take off or landing then I expect the pilot might be expected to be concentrating on the job in hand.

Remote filming like a go pro might be different but again there may be rules about attaching it to windows etc and again about sharing it online.

But to answer your question there aren’t any rules (as far as I’m aware of) stopping people taking pictures generally but the airline themselves may have rules about it and when you can take them and what you can do with them,

Thanks. You should post more interesting ones. Anyhow, apologies for the thread hijack. Back on topic; yes, snoopers charter bad.

[anonymous-user]

jjlynn27 said:

Thanks. You should post more interesting ones.

Me personally? Or pilots in general? I’m not sure I’ve posted any for years,



Here’s one of a glacier going into the sea in Greenland. Is that what your after or more of runways and stuff?

[djdest]

Is there a thread running for such pics? Would love to see more