Home Secretary greenlights police to use new Taser 'within w

Home Secretary greenlights police to use new Taser 'within w

Author
Discussion

Murph7355

37,716 posts

256 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
XCP said:
...The fact that he received compo in the past should not necessarily be seen as an admission of wrongdoing. It's just cheaper.
Which is an absolute crying shame and at the root of a lot of social ills in this country now IMO. The direct cost may be cheaper, I'm not sure of the indirect knock on costs.

XCP

16,915 posts

228 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
XCP said:
...The fact that he received compo in the past should not necessarily be seen as an admission of wrongdoing. It's just cheaper.
Which is an absolute crying shame and at the root of a lot of social ills in this country now IMO. The direct cost may be cheaper, I'm not sure of the indirect knock on costs.
Been that way for a while now. Cheaper to give someone a few quid than to instruct lawyers and argue the toss in court, when in all likelihood the force will have to cover their own costs anyway. Of course lawyers acting for complainants are well aware of this.

XCP

16,915 posts

228 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
XCP said:
The police and other organisations often make payouts without any admission of liability. fk off money in the vernacular. The fact that he received compo in the past should not necessarily be seen as an admission of wrongdoing.
But wrongdoing can't be ruled out.
Indeed. But the way some are talking it's some kind of cast iron admission, which is clearly not the case.

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Tuesday 24th January 2017
quotequote all
Borroxs said:
Two able bodied coppers can't handle one old man that's actually only trying to leave the scene, isn't swinging a baseball bat or anything. Even his dog didn't put up a fuss FFS.

Love the way she says "youve been tasered" in her wurzel accent.
He just doesn't give a st! Man's faithful friend!

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

158 months

Tuesday 24th January 2017
quotequote all
XCP said:
Indeed. But the way some are talking it's some kind of cast iron admission, which is clearly not the case.
As you would say: indeed. OTOH with the way some are talking there is obviously no wrongdoing even though there's a compensation payment, which is equally clearly not the case.

XCP

16,915 posts

228 months

Tuesday 24th January 2017
quotequote all
Rumours locally suggest there is another video showing this gentleman 'interacting' a while back with some members of the public, not of the police variety. Might be interesting if that is the case.
We shall see perhaps.

Sheets Tabuer

18,961 posts

215 months

Tuesday 11th July 2017
quotequote all
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4684606/Fe...

She's been charged

Edited by Sheets Tabuer on Tuesday 11th July 12:38

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
Sheets Tabuer said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4684606/Fe...

She's been charged

Edited by Sheets Tabuer on Tuesday 11th July 12:38
It's trial time in the above case.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-43870...

However in another twist it appears the victim of that taser incident/the race relations adviser is a bit of a racist himself.

"A former race relations advisor to the police has been charged with a racially aggravated offence.

Judah Adunbi, 64, was arrested at his Bristol home on 18 April and will appear in court next month.

Mr Adunbi was hit in the face with a Taser in January 2017."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-43849...

Greendubber

13,213 posts

203 months

Friday 18th May 2018
quotequote all
Officer found not guilty of assault at court.


He's also been charged for the racially aggravated offence in a betting shop and will be in court on the 22nd of May.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th July 2018
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Officer found not guilty of assault at court.
Indeed:

La Liga said:
If they honestly believe him to be someone wanted, then I don't see too much trouble legally justifying the force.
They can have a second bite with the misconduct, though. Hopefully it'll get binned since the criminal matter was not proven.

Greendubber said:
He's also been charged for the racially aggravated offence in a betting shop and will be in court on the 22nd of May.
He was found NG over the allegation he called the betting shop worker 'white scum'. Sounds like the witnesses didn't perform too well in court.

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
She's been cleared at her misconduct hearing too.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/05/po...

pavarotti1980

4,898 posts

84 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
She's been cleared at her misconduct hearing too.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/05/po...
Judah Adunbi claims he wouldnt have shot if he was White British. that of course is correct as a white british would not be mistaken for an afro-carribean man quite so easily.

he is now commencing civil proceedings. 3rd time lucky must be what he is hoping for

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
Quick glance back through the topic shows this attracted all the trolls / people who can't resist posting even through they have no idea what they're talking about.

They're oddly quiet now.

BlackLabel said:
She's been cleared at her misconduct hearing too.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/05/po...
It only took 19 (?) months to sort...



BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
pavarotti1980 said:
Judah Adunbi claims he wouldnt have shot if he was White British. that of course is correct as a white british would not be mistaken for an afro-carribean man quite so easily.
hehe

XCP

16,915 posts

228 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
pavarotti1980 said:
Judah Adunbi claims he wouldnt have shot if he was White British. that of course is correct as a white british would not be mistaken for an afro-carribean man quite so easily.

he is now commencing civil proceedings. 3rd time lucky must be what he is hoping for
If a misconduct hearing and a criminal court are satisfied that the force used was justifiable, it makes one wonder what grounds he thinks he has for a civil action. I am aware that the burden of proof is lower, but so is that in a misconduct hearing. I presume he is after 'f&ck off' money. I hope he doesn't get any.

pavarotti1980

4,898 posts

84 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
XCP said:
If a misconduct hearing and a criminal court are satisfied that the force used was justifiable, it makes one wonder what grounds he thinks he has for a civil action. I am aware that the burden of proof is lower, but so is that in a misconduct hearing. I presume he is after 'f&ck off' money. I hope he doesn't get any.
I hope they use the fact the criminal and employment thresholds havent been met as justification to take him on.

Maybe he should take it on the chin (just like he did with the taser barb) and move on and know in future not to be a smart ar5e and just answer a simple question like "what is your name?"

Greendubber

13,213 posts

203 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
pavarotti1980 said:
XCP said:
If a misconduct hearing and a criminal court are satisfied that the force used was justifiable, it makes one wonder what grounds he thinks he has for a civil action. I am aware that the burden of proof is lower, but so is that in a misconduct hearing. I presume he is after 'f&ck off' money. I hope he doesn't get any.
I hope they use the fact the criminal and employment thresholds havent been met as justification to take him on.

Maybe he should take it on the chin (just like he did with the taser barb) and move on and know in future not to be a smart ar5e and just answer a simple question like "what is your name?"
He'll get fk off money. They'll give him a few grand and tell him to bugger off. Personally I'd rather they fight it but they wont as it's cheaper to pay him a smaller amount to just fk off.

pavarotti1980

4,898 posts

84 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
He'll get fk off money. They'll give him a few grand and tell him to bugger off. Personally I'd rather they fight it but they wont as it's cheaper to pay him a smaller amount to just fk off.
Crowd fund their defence

XCP

16,915 posts

228 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
I used to patrol the area where this took place on foot, about 35 years ago. I once ran for my life from a mob of men brandishing knives in a street round the corner from where this took place. ( Heron Road if anyone knows it) It was pretty rough then and so were the coppers. In those days our only weapon was a wooden truncheon. I only ever used mine once on a human being. Handcuffs were very rarely carried. They were not personal issue.

If this incident had occurred in 1982 he would have been decked by 2 officers, and restrained physically until reinforcements arrived. He may well have been injured in the process. He would then have been bundled into the back of a 2 door car and taken to the station where he would be subject to detention before the safeguards introduced by PACE, and would probably have been charged with something made up and detained for court. ( No CPS in those days)

No-one of course would be filming or photographing the incident.

All in all, how things have changed for the better! People have short memories.

( apologies if I have got too anecdotal)




hidetheelephants

24,358 posts

193 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
Admirable brevity compared to our other resident ramblingly reminiscent ex-copper, not that I'd like either of you to stop. hehe