ITV This Morning "Ban the burka?" poll

ITV This Morning "Ban the burka?" poll

Author
Discussion

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
Flip side, forcing people to conform will not aid integration either.
That's a strange claim. How does someone who wears a burka achieve integration? They're not going to be engaged by people who feel uncomfortable talking to them, so how does this work?

I thought the purpose of the burka was to isolate the woman from other people. Have I got that wrong? I once tried to help one who dropped a bag in an airport and I was ignored and given the evil eye. Well, eyes, actually.

gooner1

10,223 posts

180 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Here are the women in 1970s Iran... What is missing?



52 Americans.

Murph7355

37,767 posts

257 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
WinstonWolf said:
98elise said:
WinstonWolf said:
98elise said:
It a type of hat, I can't see why it should be banned.

If I wanted to wear sunglasses, a hat, and a surgical mask then I should be able to. Its your problem if you don't like it.
I take it you struggle to interact in the real world?
Generally I don't dress like that, however we live in a reasonably free country so why does a particular design of hat need legislating against?
A hat you say? So these are equally OK in your view?

IMO yes. If you want to make yourself look like a tool with what you wear, it's your choice. There is no need to fill up the statute books with such rubbish. It's a waste of time and resource and is ironically decisive in itself.

Far better to educate.

(Where security requirements dictate, burkhas, helmets, pillow cases with holes, surgical marks etc etc should all be removed and people should accept that - the tolerance quid quo pro.)

AJL308

6,390 posts

157 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
fesuvious said:
The Problem?

I'll say it.

Whatever spin any person wishes to apply, and no matter what the response persons from any particular demographic wish to give;

In this country, and many other, primarily western countries there is a dislike & mistrust of Islam.

Yes face coverings are undesirable. No matter if a helmet, balaclava or anything else but that is different. That is the fact that communication by expression is important. Plus its a trust thing.

This, well is out and out mistrust>hatred of Islam.

Nothing to do with skin colour, nor overall 'tolerance' it's Islam, pure and simple.



Edited by fesuvious on Wednesday 7th December 11:10
I am and have always been in favor of banning face coverings in public and it's not due to a distrust of Islam. Although Islamic reasons for them are more concerning than most.

No one should be allowed to cover their face in public unless they are doing it for safety reasons or some reason required in law. Leaving aside the issue of people hiding their identity it just isn't how our society operates. We interact with people's faces not just their eyes.

Murph7355

37,767 posts

257 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
PS Yes, I find the exemption for Sikhs wearing turbans not to have to wear crash hats ridiculous too.

PPS the poll result says more about the demographics of This Morning viewers than anything. I imagine most watch it while thumbing through the Daily Mail.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
AJL308 said:
No one should be allowed to cover their face in public unless they are doing it for safety reasons or some reason required in law. Leaving aside the issue of people hiding their identity it just isn't how our society operates. We interact with people's faces not just their eyes.
Generally agree, but I'd make an exception in the case of Diane Abbott....smile

Hosenbugler

1,854 posts

103 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
I do not beleive wearing a mask in public is acceptable, in any form or manner. Be it the high street, supermarket, whatever. Any garment, article which shows only the eyes should be barred from use in public, Oh, and yes, the removal of full face motorcycle helmets whilst not on the machine should also be looked at.

Masks can need to be worn , in work environments for protection against fumes, dust, etc etc, but in everyday life, nope,

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
WinstonWolf said:
98elise said:
WinstonWolf said:
98elise said:
It a type of hat, I can't see why it should be banned.

If I wanted to wear sunglasses, a hat, and a surgical mask then I should be able to. Its your problem if you don't like it.
I take it you struggle to interact in the real world?
Generally I don't dress like that, however we live in a reasonably free country so why does a particular design of hat need legislating against?
A hat you say? So these are equally OK in your view?

IMO yes. If you want to make yourself look like a tool with what you wear, it's your choice. There is no need to fill up the statute books with such rubbish. It's a waste of time and resource and is ironically decisive in itself.

Far better to educate.

(Where security requirements dictate, burkhas, helmets, pillow cases with holes, surgical marks etc etc should all be removed and people should accept that - the tolerance quid quo pro.)
Education is key, no woman would choose to wear one unless she's been exposed to indoctrination at some point in her life. We need to educate people that wearing one is rude and the Brits don't like bad manners...

dudleybloke

19,873 posts

187 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
Could I walk into a mosque wearing a motorcycle helmet or S10 respirator without getting any undue attention???

Murph7355

37,767 posts

257 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
chrispmartha said:
Flip side, forcing people to conform will not aid integration either.
That's a strange claim. How does someone who wears a burka achieve integration? They're not going to be engaged by people who feel uncomfortable talking to them, so how does this work?

I thought the purpose of the burka was to isolate the woman from other people. Have I got that wrong? I once tried to help one who dropped a bag in an airport and I was ignored and given the evil eye. Well, eyes, actually.
He's not saying that. He's saying that forcing people either way does not facilitate integration. And he's correct.

AJL308

6,390 posts

157 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
AJL308 said:
No one should be allowed to cover their face in public unless they are doing it for safety reasons or some reason required in law. Leaving aside the issue of people hiding their identity it just isn't how our society operates. We interact with people's faces not just their eyes.
Generally agree, but I'd make an exception in the case of Diane Abbott....smile
Not just an exception - she would be required to wear a heavy Iron mask, suitably riveted shut! Annex "A" to the Act would contain extensive detail as to how Diane Abbott may, or may not, present herself in public.

Funkycoldribena

7,379 posts

155 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
AJL308 said:
mybrainhurts said:
AJL308 said:
No one should be allowed to cover their face in public unless they are doing it for safety reasons or some reason required in law. Leaving aside the issue of people hiding their identity it just isn't how our society operates. We interact with people's faces not just their eyes.
Generally agree, but I'd make an exception in the case of Diane Abbott....smile
Not just an exception - she would be required to wear a heavy Iron mask, suitably riveted shut! Annex "A" to the Act would contain extensive detail as to how Diane Abbott may, or may not, present herself in public.
A certain poster isn't going to be happy with you two.

chrispmartha

15,516 posts

130 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
chrispmartha said:
Flip side, forcing people to conform will not aid integration either.
That's a strange claim. How does someone who wears a burka achieve integration? They're not going to be engaged by people who feel uncomfortable talking to them, so how does this work?

I thought the purpose of the burka was to isolate the woman from other people. Have I got that wrong? I once tried to help one who dropped a bag in an airport and I was ignored and given the evil eye. Well, eyes, actually.
It's not really a strange claim when you think about it. Forcing people to conform (remember a lot of the women that wear burkas are british born) will alienate just as much as integrate.

And also whete did I say wearing burkas helped integration? Its a complex situation which i dont think will be helped by banning things.

And your one anecdote? Maybe she was just a grumpy sod

Goaty Bill 2

3,416 posts

120 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Here are the women in 1970s Iran... What is missing?

Ayatollah Khomeini


John145

2,449 posts

157 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
mybrainhurts said:
chrispmartha said:
Flip side, forcing people to conform will not aid integration either.
That's a strange claim. How does someone who wears a burka achieve integration? They're not going to be engaged by people who feel uncomfortable talking to them, so how does this work?

I thought the purpose of the burka was to isolate the woman from other people. Have I got that wrong? I once tried to help one who dropped a bag in an airport and I was ignored and given the evil eye. Well, eyes, actually.
It's not really a strange claim when you think about it. Forcing people to conform (remember a lot of the women that wear burkas are british born) will alienate just as much as integrate.

And also whete did I say wearing burkas helped integration? Its a complex situation which i dont think will be helped by banning things.

And your one anecdote? Maybe she was just a grumpy sod
Lots of things have been banned that discriminate against either gender. This is no different.

Hosenbugler

1,854 posts

103 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
Goaty Bill 2 said:
Jasandjules said:
Here are the women in 1970s Iran... What is missing?

Ayatollah Khomeini
He's under the bench with a mirror on a stick.........

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

234 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
Cotty said:
I don't think anyone should be walking around with their face covered, imagine if our own police force started wearing masks or helmets (and refused to remove them) there would be uproar.
This is sort of where i come from.

If I saw a person walking down the Norwich High street in a balaclava and ski mask unless it was -10 and snowing I would be asking questions in my head.

When I go to places where it is -10 or lower people do have their faces covered until they walk inside then it is a race to see who can strip the most layers off the fastest with hats, balaclavas, gloves and masks being the first off.

As I understand it the Burka is not a full part of Islam but something that a certain hardliner sect of the religion has decreed is required. As such it is an optional extra, not a religious requirement anymore than it was a requirement of odd Christian sects that the women must all have nooky with the big cheese. There is however a general requirement that both men and women dress modestly and whilst it's not my bag i sort of see the hair covering thing. I have no issues with the Hijab (find then strangely alluring on a lady with the right bone structure) nor any issues with the Chador, not a fan of that though. As for the Niqab and the Burka - save them for Islamic states, we should not be forced to accept them any more than we should an Irish chap walking down the road with a table leg, a packet of marzipan and a balaclava in mid June.

del mar

2,838 posts

200 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
mybrainhurts said:
chrispmartha said:
Flip side, forcing people to conform will not aid integration either.
That's a strange claim. How does someone who wears a burka achieve integration? They're not going to be engaged by people who feel uncomfortable talking to them, so how does this work?

I thought the purpose of the burka was to isolate the woman from other people. Have I got that wrong? I once tried to help one who dropped a bag in an airport and I was ignored and given the evil eye. Well, eyes, actually.
It's not really a strange claim when you think about it. Forcing people to conform (remember a lot of the women that wear burkas are british born) will alienate just as much as integrate.

And also whete did I say wearing burkas helped integration? Its a complex situation which i dont think will be helped by banning things.

And your one anecdote? Maybe she was just a grumpy sod
On Monday we have a report stating that Muslims do not integrate and it is causing social issues in society. Yet some in society are defending their right to dress in a black sheet. Which will lead to white flight and large areas that are only Muslim, and then people will say "We have an integration problem...."

I refuse to believe any of us Non Muslims could have a meaningful friendship with a woman dressed head to toe in a black sheet, where you have never seen her face. You are just talking to a black sheet.

If their religious dress is more important than wider society then perhaps they are not for our society.




Murph7355

37,767 posts

257 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
WinstonWolf said:
Education is key, no woman would choose to wear one unless she's been exposed to indoctrination at some point in her life. We need to educate people that wearing one is rude and the Brits don't like bad manners...
Generally I wouldn't go assuming what the one woman in my life would choose to do, let alone them all.

I'm sure there are some women compelled to wear one who don't want to. That is wrong. Equally I'm sure that there are some who are fine enough wearing it as a symbol/part of their beliefs. To preclude them from doing so in law is also wrong.

That you or I do not understand their religion and the drivers behind some customs is irrelevant and a bigger damning indictment on us than them frankly.

If you're gunning for religious garb then ban it all. But we cannot allow our own prejudices to single people out in law.


AJL308

6,390 posts

157 months

Wednesday 7th December 2016
quotequote all
del mar said:
On Monday we have a report stating that Muslims do not integrate and it is causing social issues in society. Yet some in society are defending their right to dress in a black sheet. Which will lead to white flight and large areas that are only Muslim, and then people will say "We have an integration problem...."

I refuse to believe any of us Non Muslims could have a meaningful friendship with a woman dressed head to toe in a black sheet, where you have never seen her face. You are just talking to a black sheet.

If their religious dress is more important than wider society then perhaps they are not for our society.
And this is the point. Our society is based on facial recognition and facial communication. A person who entirely covers their face cannot possibly forge new friendships and other relationships because that is not how humans communicate. It is an utter impossibility - which is, of course, the whole point of covering a woman's face in the societies from which these practices originate. So that they cannot "stray".

No Muslim woman will ever "integrate" with wider UK society if they keep their faces covered. Banning the wearing of full-face coverings in public will far better integrate people than continuing to allow them.