The economic consequences of Brexit (Vol 2)

[Burwood]

don4l said:

B'stard Child said:

PurpleMoonlight said:

B'stard Child said:

I almost agree with Don4l there is one thing that I want negotiated - get that done and the rest is window dressing

What's that?

The rights of migrants living/working here and the rights of UK citizens working or living abroad

I suspect that we probably agree on this issue.

My view is that after we invoke Article 50, we set a date after which residency rights will not apply. All the EU citizens that currently reside here will retain their residency rights so long as they continue to live here.

I don't foresee any problems for British people living in the EU. Most of them are retirees who contribute to the local economies. If they had to return to the UK there would be a terrible effect on housing markets as well as the local economies.

I would be happy enough allowing them to stay however get a serious conviction, you're sent packing.

[B'stard Child]

Mrr T said:

steveT350C said:

Some stuff about 'passporting' for Mrr T, and everyone else of course

https://www.ft.com/content/aa76b168-a5b9-11e6-8898...

Behind a paywall so cannot comment.

Of course you can

Type the article heading into google

Then navigate to a readable copy from google

I'd post up a copy but

FT said:

High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our T&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2017. All rights reserved. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

Edited by B'stard Child on Sunday 15th January 21:22

[CaptainSlow]

don4l said:

Mrr T said:

don4l said:

I don't foresee any problems for British people living in the EU. Most of them are retirees who contribute to the local economies. If they had to return to the UK there would be a terrible effect on housing markets as well as the local economies.

I will take a guess that our leading Brexit buffon does not know what the S1 system is and why it's loss would effect many UK retiree in the rEU.

"effect" is a noun. The word that you were looking for was "affect".

Are you really incapable of spelling "buffoon" correctly?

You only use the apostrophe in "it's" when you are using the contracted form of "it is". It doesn't have an apostrophe when used in the possesive.

You accuse me of being a buffon[sic], and in a single sentence you make four spelling/grammar mistakes.

Your ill-informed arrogance is astounding.


If you cannot write a single sentence without at least four errors, what on Earth makes you think that you can foresee the effects of Brexit?

He has a degree don't you know. A highly intelligent Remainer.

[B'stard Child]

CaptainSlow said:

don4l said:

Mrr T said:

don4l said:

I don't foresee any problems for British people living in the EU. Most of them are retirees who contribute to the local economies. If they had to return to the UK there would be a terrible effect on housing markets as well as the local economies.

I will take a guess that our leading Brexit buffon does not know what the S1 system is and why it's loss would effect many UK retiree in the rEU.

"effect" is a noun. The word that you were looking for was "affect".

Are you really incapable of spelling "buffoon" correctly?

You only use the apostrophe in "it's" when you are using the contracted form of "it is". It doesn't have an apostrophe when used in the possesive.

You accuse me of being a buffon[sic], and in a single sentence you make four spelling/grammar mistakes.

Your ill-informed arrogance is astounding.


If you cannot write a single sentence without at least four errors, what on Earth makes you think that you can foresee the effects of Brexit?

He has a degree don't you know. A highly intelligent Remainer.

He probably is very intelligent and no doubt that he favoured remain before the referendum as I had some discussion with him.

Struggles with quotes
Struggles with Tables
Struggles with navigating past paywalls

I have no difficulty with any of those issues because

1. I don't have a degree

or

2. When I can't do something I keep at it till I can and I never give up

[Mrr T]

don4l said:

Mrr T said:

don4l said:

I don't foresee any problems for British people living in the EU. Most of them are retirees who contribute to the local economies. If they had to return to the UK there would be a terrible effect on housing markets as well as the local economies.

I will take a guess that our leading Brexit buffon does not know what the S1 system is and why it's loss would effect many UK retiree in the rEU.

"effect" is a noun. The word that you were looking for was "affect".

Are you really incapable of spelling "buffoon" correctly?

You only use the apostrophe in "it's" when you are using the contracted form of "it is". It doesn't have an apostrophe when used in the possesive.

You accuse me of being a buffon[sic], and in a single sentence you make four spelling/grammar mistakes.

Your ill-informed arrogance is astounding.


If you cannot write a single sentence without at least four errors, what on Earth makes you think that you can foresee the effects of Brexit?

Got to laugh at PH leading Brexit buffoon. Still no comment about why the S1 system maybe important to UK retiree in the rEU.

[B'stard Child]

Mrr T said:

don4l said:

Mrr T said:

don4l said:

I don't foresee any problems for British people living in the EU. Most of them are retirees who contribute to the local economies. If they had to return to the UK there would be a terrible effect on housing markets as well as the local economies.

I will take a guess that our leading Brexit buffon does not know what the S1 system is and why it's loss would effect many UK retiree in the rEU.

"effect" is a noun. The word that you were looking for was "affect".

Are you really incapable of spelling "buffoon" correctly?

You only use the apostrophe in "it's" when you are using the contracted form of "it is". It doesn't have an apostrophe when used in the possesive.

You accuse me of being a buffon[sic], and in a single sentence you make four spelling/grammar mistakes.

Your ill-informed arrogance is astounding.


If you cannot write a single sentence without at least four errors, what on Earth makes you think that you can foresee the effects of Brexit?

Got to laugh at PH leading Brexit buffoon. Still no comment about why the S1 system maybe important to UK retiree in the rEU.

He's quite transparent and he's never deviated from his view since "independence day"

Now as far as healthcare benefits in Europe go - the treatment costs are charged back - very effectively by European Hospitals back to the NHS

The UK is not quite so good at this - I wonder how much our issues with NHS being overloaded is down to this?

Anyway you think that the other European nations will no longer treat UK Citizens and claim back the costs? It seems they have got very slick at it.

[PRTVR]

B'stard Child said:

Mrr T said:

don4l said:

Mrr T said:

don4l said:

I don't foresee any problems for British people living in the EU. Most of them are retirees who contribute to the local economies. If they had to return to the UK there would be a terrible effect on housing markets as well as the local economies.

I will take a guess that our leading Brexit buffon does not know what the S1 system is and why it's loss would effect many UK retiree in the rEU.

"effect" is a noun. The word that you were looking for was "affect".

Are you really incapable of spelling "buffoon" correctly?

You only use the apostrophe in "it's" when you are using the contracted form of "it is". It doesn't have an apostrophe when used in the possesive.

You accuse me of being a buffon[sic], and in a single sentence you make four spelling/grammar mistakes.

Your ill-informed arrogance is astounding.


If you cannot write a single sentence without at least four errors, what on Earth makes you think that you can foresee the effects of Brexit?

Got to laugh at PH leading Brexit buffoon. Still no comment about why the S1 system maybe important to UK retiree in the rEU.

He's quite transparent and he's never deviated from his view since "independence day"

Now as far as healthcare benefits in Europe go - the treatment costs are charged back - very effectively by European Hospitals back to the NHS

The UK is not quite so good at this - I wonder how much our issues with NHS being overloaded is down to this?

Anyway you think that the other European nations will no longer treat UK Citizens and claim back the costs? It seems they have got very slick at it.

Along with immigration running at what is it ? a city the size of Cardiff every year, are we increasing services to compensate for this ? I think not.

[powerstroke]

PRTVR said:

Along with immigration running at what is it ? a city the size of Cardiff every year, are we increasing services to compensate for this ? I think not.

we could increase services but where would the money come from , most immigrants are on a minimum wage and pay little tax into the system
maybe we could charge employers a surcharge on NI for non UK nationals , seriously the people of the uk can't afford the current level of immigration it's that simple!!!!!

[Digga]

don4l said:

Mrr T said:

buffon

Are you really incapable of spelling "buffoon" correctly?

He might have mean bouffant, you know, like the Donald's hair do?

[FiF]

Digga said:

don4l said:

Mrr T said:

buffon

Are you really incapable of spelling "buffoon" correctly?

He might have mean bouffant, you know, like the Donald's hair do?

Or messing about with fonts here

[Mrr T]

powerstroke said:

PRTVR said:

Along with immigration running at what is it ? a city the size of Cardiff every year, are we increasing services to compensate for this ? I think not.

we could increase services but where would the money come from , most immigrants are on a minimum wage and pay little tax into the system
maybe we could charge employers a surcharge on NI for non UK nationals , seriously the people of the uk can't afford the current level of immigration it's that simple!!!!!

So PH poster makes up statistics to justify his view. You have to laugh.

[Mrr T]

FiF said:

Digga said:

don4l said:

Mrr T said:

buffon

Are you really incapable of spelling "buffoon" correctly?

He might have mean bouffant, you know, like the Donald's hair do?

Or messing about with fonts here

Buffon is also an Italian goalkeeper currently captain of Juventus and the national team.

I also expects he knows more about brexit than don4l.

[FiF]

Mrr T said:

FiF said:

Digga said:

don4l said:

Mrr T said:

buffon

Are you really incapable of spelling "buffoon" correctly?

He might have mean bouffant, you know, like the Donald's hair do?

Or messing about with fonts here

Buffon is also an Italian goalkeeper currently captain of Juventus and the national team.

I also expects he knows more about brexit than don4l.

Probably, a good comeback there. Laughs.

By the way, as mentioned before, all this has stemmed from someone trying to destroy an argument by attacking spelling and punctuation without addressing the actual issues.

[loafer123]

So back to the subject.

What economic benefit as a %age of GDP do we all think a trade deal with the USA would deliver?

[anonymous-user]

don4l said:

Mrr T said:

don4l said:

I don't foresee any problems for British people living in the EU. Most of them are retirees who contribute to the local economies. If they had to return to the UK there would be a terrible effect on housing markets as well as the local economies.

I will take a guess that our leading Brexit buffon does not know what the S1 system is and why it's loss would effect many UK retiree in the rEU.

"effect" is a noun. The word that you were looking for was "affect".

Are you really incapable of spelling "buffoon" correctly?

You only use the apostrophe in "it's" when you are using the contracted form of "it is". It doesn't have an apostrophe when used in the possesive.

You accuse me of being a buffon[sic], and in a single sentence you make four spelling/grammar mistakes.

Your ill-informed arrogance is astounding.


If you cannot write a single sentence without at least four errors, what on Earth makes you think that you can foresee the effects of Brexit?

That sounds interesting. Is it anything to do with the possessive?

[Murph7355]

loafer123 said:

So back to the subject.

What economic benefit as a %age of GDP do we all think a trade deal with the USA would deliver?

42.

[Digga]

Murph7355 said:

loafer123 said:

So back to the subject.

What economic benefit as a %age of GDP do we all think a trade deal with the USA would deliver?

42.

Cake.

[B'stard Child]

Murph7355 said:

loafer123 said:

So back to the subject.

What economic benefit as a %age of GDP do we all think a trade deal with the USA would deliver?

42.

As good a guess as any!

[jjlynn27]

Murph7355 said:

loafer123 said:

So back to the subject.

What economic benefit as a %age of GDP do we all think a trade deal with the USA would deliver?

42.

Would that include all the fish?

[B'stard Child]

jjlynn27 said:

Murph7355 said:

loafer123 said:

So back to the subject.

What economic benefit as a %age of GDP do we all think a trade deal with the USA would deliver?

42.

Would that include all the fish?

Michael or the ones that can breathe underwater?