Climate change - the POLITICAL debate. Vol 4

[DapperDanMan]

robinessex said:

DapperDanMan said:

robinessex said:

At what point do we assume durbster has lost the plot?

If he has he'll fit in well on this thread then.

Well, as your first post here in 1530 pages, I'm sure you are well qualified and informed to make that statement.

Thank you I am indeed.

[DapperDanMan]

turbobloke said:

DapperDanMan said:

robinessex said:

At what point do we assume durbster has lost the plot?

If he has he'll fit in well on this thread then.

The thread that you posted in and fitted in just fine? OK!

The greatest plot loser of all speaks. You do seriously need to get a life TB.

[robinessex]

DapperDanMan said:

turbobloke said:

DapperDanMan said:

robinessex said:

At what point do we assume durbster has lost the plot?

If he has he'll fit in well on this thread then.

The thread that you posted in and fitted in just fine? OK!

The greatest plot loser of all speaks. You do seriously need to get a life TB.

How would you know? You read all 1530 pages of this topic then ?

[DapperDanMan]

robinessex said:

DapperDanMan said:

turbobloke said:

DapperDanMan said:

robinessex said:

At what point do we assume durbster has lost the plot?

If he has he'll fit in well on this thread then.

The thread that you posted in and fitted in just fine? OK!

The greatest plot loser of all speaks. You do seriously need to get a life TB.

How would you know? You read all 1530 pages of this topic then ?

His minion speaks.

I can summarise it

All non fossil fuel energy is a waste of time
Climate Change is happening but it is not man made
Carry on burning fossil fuel
Windmills cause smog in China
It is all a con to extract tax
Lots of graphs
Gang up on anyone who is not a true believer whilst claiming they are true believers

Did I miss anything?

[robinessex]

DapperDanMan said:

robinessex said:

DapperDanMan said:

turbobloke said:

DapperDanMan said:

robinessex said:

At what point do we assume durbster has lost the plot?

If he has he'll fit in well on this thread then.

The thread that you posted in and fitted in just fine? OK!

The greatest plot loser of all speaks. You do seriously need to get a life TB.

How would you know? You read all 1530 pages of this topic then ?

His minion speaks.

I can summarise it

All non fossil fuel energy is a waste of time
Climate Change is happening but it is not man made
Carry on burning fossil fuel
Windmills cause smog in China
It is all a con to extract tax
Lots of graphs
Gang up on anyone who is not a true believer whilst claiming they are true believers

Did I miss anything?

Nope. Your obvious extensive knowledge of the subject is much appreciated in this room, thanks for your effort.

[DapperDanMan]

robinessex said:

DapperDanMan said:

robinessex said:

DapperDanMan said:

turbobloke said:

DapperDanMan said:

robinessex said:

At what point do we assume durbster has lost the plot?

If he has he'll fit in well on this thread then.

The thread that you posted in and fitted in just fine? OK!

The greatest plot loser of all speaks. You do seriously need to get a life TB.

How would you know? You read all 1530 pages of this topic then ?

His minion speaks.

I can summarise it

All non fossil fuel energy is a waste of time
Climate Change is happening but it is not man made
Carry on burning fossil fuel
Windmills cause smog in China
It is all a con to extract tax
Lots of graphs
Gang up on anyone who is not a true believer whilst claiming they are true believers

Did I miss anything?

Nope. Your obvious extensive knowledge of the subject is much appreciated in this room, thanks for your effort.

You are more than welcome.

[durbster]

Here we go again. The instant attacks on any person daring to question the gospel according to PH climate cult.

So predictable.

[tomw2000]

durbster said:

Here we go again. The instant attacks on any person daring to question the gospel according to PH climate cult.

So predictable.

http://www.ultimateglobalwarmingchallenge.com/

Fill yer boots.

[turbobloke]

DapperDanMan said:

turbobloke said:

DapperDanMan said:

robinessex said:

At what point do we assume durbster has lost the plot?

If he has he'll fit in well on this thread then.

The thread that you posted in and fitted in just fine? OK!

The greatest plot loser of all speaks. You do seriously need to get a life TB.

You're offering nothing to the thread, and your 'life' on it this morning is a handbag caricature of irony and hypocrisy. For one minute, I thought you might have a source linking the thread to a visible causal human signal in global climate data...but, no. Shame! As durbster's apprentice you would have secured great favour (am I doing this right?).

As it happens I spend barely 20-30 mins on PH per day in total by toe-dipping in and out, and enjoy being here. There's always something to learn from people with experience and expertise in different disciplines, but not from sourpuss snipers with only put-downs on offer. Even the insults from these people lack originality and humour. Recognise anything here? Have a nice day!

Meanwhile back on topic, at least as far as the junkscience and propaganda of agw politics will allow:



Global polar bear population larger than previously thought, almost 30,000 and up 27% since 2005

https://polarbearscience.com/2017/02/23/global-pol...

As the narrative sets out, it's less than very likely that this picture will be painted in media coverage of International Polar Bear Day. Yes, it's real and it's on the 27th of February.

[DapperDanMan]

durbster said:

Here we go again. The instant attacks on any person daring to question the gospel according to PH climate cult.

So predictable.

It isn't really a thread on Politics of Climate Change it is more a cult newsletter.

Anyway it is good to stir the hornets nest now and again.

I am sure some people are currently looking through my profile and history to find something that proves I am a left wing shandy drinker and therefore nothing I say matters.

[turbobloke]

Ignoring the additional irony and hypocrisy in this 'attacks' nonsense, here's an informed commentary using the IPCC's own gigo modelling which rightly attacks and ridicules the UN's approach to wasting over 100 trillion dollars.

Dr Bjorn Lomborg said:

We will spend at least one hundred trillion dollars in order to reduce the temperature by the end of the century by a grand total of three tenths of one degree, the equivalent of postponing warming by less than four years. Again, that is using the UN's own climate prediction model.

If the U.S. delivers for the whole century on President Obama's very ambitious rhetoric, it would postpone global warming by about eight months at the end of the century.

[durbster]

tomw2000 said:

durbster said:

Here we go again. The instant attacks on any person daring to question the gospel according to PH climate cult.

So predictable.

http://www.ultimateglobalwarmingchallenge.com/

Fill yer boots.

What?

[PRTVR]

turbobloke said:

Meanwhile back on topic, at least as far as the junkscience and propaganda of agw politics will allow:



Global polar bear population larger than previously thought, almost 30,000 and up 27% since 2005

https://polarbearscience.com/2017/02/23/global-pol...

As the narrative sets out, it's less than very likely that this picture will be painted in media coverage of International Polar Bear Day. Yes, it's real and it's on the 27th of February.

And then due to a limited food source the numbers will reduce, it's the natural cycle of things, things go up then go down, remind you of anything ?

[durbster]

PRTVR said:

And then due to a limited food source the numbers will reduce, it's the natural cycle of things, things go up then go down, remind you of anything ?

There's no such thing as "the natural cycle of things".

[Northbloke]

durbster said:

There's no such thing as "the natural cycle of things".

Well I remember many years ago studying this during my maths course:

http://www.mathscareers.org.uk/article/hunter-hunt...

[turbobloke]

PRTVR said:

And then due to a limited food source the numbers will reduce, it's the natural cycle of things, things go up then go down, remind you of anything ?

Before responding further I need to take the temperature of this theme...

[turbobloke]

no such thing as "the natural cycle of things"



When were the seasons cancelled?

When were planetary axial and orbital cycles cancelled?

Holy Milankovitch batman!

I missed those memos.

[PRTVR]

durbster said:

PRTVR said:

And then due to a limited food source the numbers will reduce, it's the natural cycle of things, things go up then go down, remind you of anything ?

There's no such thing as "the natural cycle of things".

Every day's a school day, may I ask how the increased number of animals survive with a reduced food source, thanks.

[Camoradi]

taking orders now

[dickymint]

PRTVR said:

durbster said:

PRTVR said:

And then due to a limited food source the numbers will reduce, it's the natural cycle of things, things go up then go down, remind you of anything ?

There's no such thing as "the natural cycle of things".

Every day's a school day, may I ask how the increased number of animals survive with a reduced food source, thanks.

They turn cannibal till the grass grows back :spin)