Is sexual abuse Police officers crime of choice?
Discussion
bmw535i said:
It's ok just to say you were wrong you know.
No issue with saying I am wrong when I am like the maths being wrong. However, I am not wrong when you either deliberately misrepresent a comment that is self-explanatory and clear in context. If that's the best you're able to conjure up then so-be-it.
bmw535i said:
I actually don't mind generalisations/criticisms of the army - a lot of them I see on here are correct - it just seems a little childish in the way it's often done. Why not just start a thread criticising it/them and we can discuss on there rather than using it to insult?
The point was about the army comment is it contained an emoticon. I was trying to use it to reinforce an obvious generalisation and that I wasn't being serious to draw a parallel with... Never mind, too subtle once more. La Liga said:
he point was about the army comment is it contained an emoticon. I was trying to use it to reinforce an obvious generalisation and that I wasn't being serious to draw a parallel with... Never mind, too subtle once more.
I see. I interpreted it as an attempt to insult or be derogatory. Maybe I should use smilies more. So I could say "most coppers are sex offenders 
" and when questioned just say it is obviously not serious.I do find your rant in the third person very amusing by the way.
I also quite enjoy our exchanges - I find they reinforce my views quite well.
don4l said:
eccles said:
No,I'm suggesting by the very nature of their job, a police officer will be subject to more false allegations than say, a bin man.
Surely the ration of those dismissed to those accused shows how many are meritless.
As for your last question I would suggest to you it's an unanswerable question, and you know it.
That is where the problem lies.Surely the ration of those dismissed to those accused shows how many are meritless.
As for your last question I would suggest to you it's an unanswerable question, and you know it.
The general public do not trust the Police disciplinary system.
bmw535i said:
I see. I interpreted it as an attempt to insult or be derogatory. Maybe I should use smilies more. So I could say "most coppers are sex offenders " and when questioned just say it is obviously not serious.
My view is that serious points aren't generally made with emoticons, but that may just be my interpretation. " and when questioned just say it is obviously not serious.La Liga said:
bmw535i said:
I see. I interpreted it as an attempt to insult or be derogatory. Maybe I should use smilies more. So I could say "most coppers are sex offenders " and when questioned just say it is obviously not serious.
My view is that serious points aren't generally made with emoticons, but that may just be my interpretation. " and when questioned just say it is obviously not serious.
)
SkrrSkrr said:
Don't you think the police should be sacked? Don't you think that the discipline procedure should be used against officers and the ultimate punishment be used?I'd be outraged if the police did not deal with its aberrant officers.
SkrrSkrr said:
Police force finds bad apple in its ranks. Police force sacks bad apple for gross misconduct. Bad apple is also prosecuted.Why is it outrageous?
SkrrSkrr said:
The court sentence does seem unduly lenient, although the Police Service have imposed the strongest sanction available i.e. Sacking.Always a pleasure to see you highlighting when the Police have been effective at removing the scum from their ranks in the same way they Police the general public. Personally I think sex offenders, violent criminals and drug dealers are often given far too lenient treatment by the courts. They deserve much worse.
- DJ khaled voice* Another one
I wonder why so many officers commit these crimes? Maybe they see lots of officer committing offences without any repercussions and they think they'll get away with their crime as well? Gang mentality?
SkrrSkrr said:
*DJ khaled voice* Another one
http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/20/police-officer-thrus...
I wonder why so many officers commit these crimes? Maybe they see lots of officer committing offences without any repercussions and they think they'll get away with their crime as well? Gang mentality?
I'm shocked that you aren't shocked, especially as it is such a shocking offence. http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/20/police-officer-thrus...
I wonder why so many officers commit these crimes? Maybe they see lots of officer committing offences without any repercussions and they think they'll get away with their crime as well? Gang mentality?
Not a rugby player then? Mind you I'd be shocked if you were.
I should point out that the offence has not been proved and the suspect denies the offence.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff