Is sexual abuse Police officers crime of choice?

[anonymous-user]

Greendubber said:

Still not annoyed, just curious.

He actually posted that he decided not to answer the question, so no I didnt get an answer to it.

Oh right, it's just you appear annoyed.

I think he suggested you start your own thread in order to answer your question. Seems a sensible response to me - considering the irrelevance of your question.

[brenflys777]

bmw535i said:

You appear annoyed because somebody continues to highlight police criminality. My question was genuine.

You been offered an answer to your genuine question.

See?

In addition to highlighting criminals or those being investigated for criminal activity, he also highlights that in each of these examples given, other Police have investigated or reported their colleagues so that a prosecution takes place. I can't think of anyone who's unaware that there are bad apples in the Police, but a reminder that they come to light mostly because of diligent colleagues is useful. Thank you.

The original post suggested that this was the crime of choice for Police Officers, as was pointed out earlier this is not evidenced by either volume of conviction or in comparison to any other job - unless someone can then I'll give the thread a miss from now on, seems to just be going around in circles even if the OP is highlighting the good work that the Police do to prosecute criminals including those within the Service.

[Greendubber]

bmw535i said:

Greendubber said:

Still not annoyed, just curious.

He actually posted that he decided not to answer the question, so no I didnt get an answer to it.

Oh right, it's just you appear annoyed.

I think he suggested you start your own thread in order to answer your question. Seems a sensible response to me - considering the irrelevance of your question.

Hardly irrelevent asking if the occupation being discussed is more prevalent than any other occupation.

Edited by Greendubber on Thursday 23 February 20:00

[anonymous-user]

Greendubber said:

Hardly irrelevent asking if the occupation being discussed is more prevalent than any other occupation.

Edited by Greendubber on Thursday 23 February 20:00

I think you should probably look into it then

[Greendubber]

bmw535i said:

Greendubber said:

Hardly irrelevent asking if the occupation being discussed is more prevalent than any other occupation.

Edited by Greendubber on Thursday 23 February 20:00

I think you should probably look into it then

I think you should stop worrying about questions that werent directed at you.

[SkrrSkrr]

Greendubber said:

I'm not repeatedly starting topics about it though am I?

Only half of my threads thats not everything....

[ATG]

bmw535i said:

Oh right, it's just you appear annoyed.

Only to people who are hoping for that reaction.

[anonymous-user]

Greendubber said:

I think you should stop worrying about questions that werent directed at you.

I'm not worried, just curious.

See?

[anonymous-user]

ATG said:

Only to people who are hoping for that reaction.

Well I suppose ones interpretation of posts on here is very subjective.

[anonymous-user]

Rape charge PC Declan Gabriel 'assaulted by victim'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-northamptonsh...

[Greendubber]

bmw535i said:

Greendubber said:

I think you should stop worrying about questions that werent directed at you.

I'm not worried, just curious.

See?

No, you're just constantly looking for an argument, its pathetic.

[anonymous-user]

Greendubber said:

No, you're just constantly looking for an argument, its pathetic.

How ironic.

[SkrrSkrr]

http://www.getbucks.co.uk/news/local-news/thames-v...

[anonymous-user]

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/ne...

[SkrrSkrr]

"A Kent Police inspector has been charged over making and distributing indecent videos."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-39155536

[0a]

Some bizarre posts on this thread; really looking to grind an axe where there is no data to do so. Even the title is unnecessarily offensive.

[anonymous-user]

0a said:

Some bizarre posts on this thread; really looking to grind an axe where there is no data to do so. Even the title is unnecessarily offensive.

You're offended by the thread title? Why would you read and contribute to a thread you are offended by before you even open it?

[Derek Smith]

bmw535i said:

You're offended by the thread title? Why would you read and contribute to a thread you are offended by before you even open it?

Perhaps to point out how offensive the title is? Just a guess.

[anonymous-user]

Derek Smith said:

Perhaps to point out how offensive the title is? Just a guess.

I guess so. Seems a little odd to me - perhaps he has an axe to grind.

[0a]

bmw535i said:

0a said:

Some bizarre posts on this thread; really looking to grind an axe where there is no data to do so. Even the title is unnecessarily offensive.

You're offended by the thread title? Why would you read and contribute to a thread you are offended by before you even open it?

Because I read the title. I reply to plenty (too many, probably!) threads. I think that a thread title that suggests that sexual abuse is the 'crime of choice' for police offices is not only untrue, but also pretty offensive. What if that was your profession slandered without evidence?

I have had plenty of disagreements with some on here (and agreements with former officers) over the current revenue driven approach attitude to speeding, but the premise of this thread, and some of the posts here really are just abusive to very tolerant PH members.

Good on them for responding. The rest of us reasonable PHers won't think worse of you if you decline to waste your time here any longer.