45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2

[unrepentant]

Eric Mc said:

He is a charlatan and, to use his own favourite word, a "fake". At some point, whether it is in the next few months or years down the line, the American people will wake up and find they have ended up with a certifiable loon in The White House and he will be removed, through election or otherwise.

Most people already realize.

So do mental health professionals.

http://www.businessinsider.com/mental-health-exper...

The 25th amendment is being openly discussed.......

[Hugo a Gogo]

scherzkeks said:

False. NIST admitted that the building was in freefall mid-collapse, a victory for A&E as NIST had previously denied freefall altogether.

NIST altered their model so that they did not have to change their total calculated collapse time. The point at which the building starts to collapse is the disagreement between NIST and A&E (mentioned previously). There is a long piece that discusses NISTS fraudulent (A&E's description) approach on the site. Well worth a read. Understanding the terminology would also be good.

Not 'the building', the video only shows 'the north face'

So the other side is damaged, on fire for hours. The video shows the centre of the roof collapsing, then the north face collapsing quickly - free fall if that's what you want - as if the rest of the building had already collapsed and the north wall was effectively free standing for a few moments

None of this makes any real difference if you don't suggest a way and a reason for demolishing it.

[Balmoral]

I saw this in Private Eye the other day, a quote from H.L. Mencken, nearly 100 years ago...

“As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”

[Disastrous]

scherzkeks said:

False. NIST admitted that the building was in freefall mid-collapse, a victory for A&E as NIST had previously denied freefall altogether.

NIST altered their model so that they did not have to change their total calculated collapse time. The point at which the building starts to collapse is the disagreement between NIST and A&E (mentioned previously). There is a long piece that discusses NISTS fraudulent (A&E's description) approach on the site. Well worth a read. Understanding the terminology would also be good.

I love how you accuse people of suffering cognitive dissonance whilst displaying the very signs of it.

You were called out yesterday and appear to have completely ignored it in favour of another subject - classic behaviour.

In case you have forgotten:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

Disastrous said:

roachcoach said:

Hugo a Gogo said:

what about those trump lies, Scherzi?

He is the most dissonant poster on the thread! Justifying Trump not publishing his taxes "as his promise was conditional" is one of the finest examples on the entire site.

I posted what the man said. Which appears not to be what you say he said.

Unless you have him on record stating he will do so unconditionally? That is what some of us were interested in.

How about him saying he'll release them once Obama's birth certificate was published?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2011/04/donald-tru...

Or that he'll release them once the audit is completed - https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/tra... . No strings other than once the audit was complete.

Your first link contains the following statement: "Donald Trump has promised to disclose the details of his finances if he decides to run for president, but not necessarily his tax returns."

And I already posted the one about the audit. That is the sort of the point here: he has never said he was releasing them unconditionally that I am aware of. The current statement from his camp remains that he is under audit.

Provide the quote or stop pushing the issue.

2 quotes enough for you? Neither have strings attached and both are very, very clear..

https://grabien.com/story.php?id=48219

orange buffoon said:

They’re very — well, it’s the very big tax returns. The biggest, I guarantee you this, the biggest ever in the history of what we’re doing. So, it’s very complicated stuff. But we’ll be releasing that.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/05/mike-pence/pences-false-claim-trump-hasnt-broken-tax-return-p/

tangerine tot said:

If I decide to run for office, I’ll produce my tax returns, absolutely and I would love to do that.

[rxtx]

Can you 911 truther lunatics please bugger off and take your batst insane theories elsewhere. Nobody cares about your ridiculous nutjob fantasies. Use a forum where other freaks are into that bullst.

[anonymous-user]

Anyone else noticed that Trump has pretty much stopped tweeting? Since around the time he announced he was taking on Dubke as communications director? Dubke, the founder of Crossroads Media, the premier Republican media services firm?

A cynical man would say that the Republican party has sat on Trump hard, told him to STFU and let someone who knows what they are doing co-ordinate his utterances.

I wonder how long the silence will last. With a new travel ban in the offing the temptation to sneak back onto his Twitter account will be strong...

[Eric Mc]

He is a "Rogue President" and needs reining in.

[jmorgan]

Not only stopped, at least one tweet was removed.

And his Mrs has refiled her claim against the Mail, removing the claim that being 1st Lady would have brought her more loot.

[PurpleAki]

Eric Mc said:

He is a "Rogue President" and needs reining in.

You're not Jack Bauer.

[Eric Mc]

I'm only interested in the real world - not a TV show.

[Halb]

Eric Mc said:

I'm only interested in the real world - not a TV show.

So not Trump?

[Halb]

jmorgan said:

Not only stopped, at least one tweet was removed.

What was he subject?

[Eric Mc]

Halb said:

So not Trump?

Sadly - he's real (I think).

[jmorgan]

Halb said:

What was he subject?

Tweeting about interviewing people at his estate. I did read it when it was tweeted and it has gone.

http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com/#/archive

Number 7 in that list.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/u...

[pinchmeimdreamin]

unrepentant said:

The 25th amendment is being openly discussed.......

Is that just among Anti-Trumpers or people who could actually have a say in it ?

[Halb]

Scary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-fifth_Amendme...

1. anyonebutpence

[anonymous-user]

Has Trump done nothing odd today? He's unusually absent from the news and twitter.

It's been all about this British gitmo bloke blowing himself up and some planet 35 light years away and the new met commissioner.

[FN2TypeR]

pinchmeimdreamin said:

unrepentant said:

The 25th amendment is being openly discussed.......

Is that just among Anti-Trumpers or people who could actually have a say in it ?

Probably by the same people who told us all that Clinton simply could not lose.

[Carl_Manchester]

Budflicker said:

[


https://southfront.org/meanwhile-rioting-breaks-ou...



mmmmmm, nothing to see here...

There is now.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39047455

"Sweden probes riot in mainly immigrant Stockholm suburb".

[Dr Doofenshmirtz]

Tommy Robinson on Sweden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDZ0pSMOPwU
You can't really argue with any of that.