45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2

45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

p1stonhead

25,568 posts

168 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
scherzkeks said:
The modern equivalent of burning books.
Drama queen
As usual, you challenge none of the facts. For that is the SJW way.
Do you have facts as to why its not 'alleged'? I dont know anything about it either way.

If you do why not just edit it back?

smn159

12,701 posts

218 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
scherzkeks said:
The modern equivalent of burning books.
Drama queen
As usual, you challenge none of the facts. For that is the SJW way.
I'm confused. Can you point out the facts in your post please;

scherzkeks said:
Its the road we are heading down unfortunately. And the SJW set is cheering it. Censorship on YT, Twitter, Reddit and other sites is off the charts. The modern equivalent of burning books.

tommunster10

1,128 posts

92 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
5ohmustang said:
Finlandia said:
We have an explanation!
Trump can foresee the future and his last night comment was actually meant to read three nights from now hehe

http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/polis-skot-varning...





To all concerned, no I was not one of the rioters.
Thank you sir for being straight up an honest, you have my total respect for sticking your neck out, that's far more than can be said for the EU puppets in this forum.
Who was rioting then?

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
smn159 said:
scherzkeks said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
scherzkeks said:
The modern equivalent of burning books.
Drama queen
As usual, you challenge none of the facts. For that is the SJW way.
I'm confused. Can you point out the facts in your post please;

scherzkeks said:
Its the road we are heading down unfortunately. And the SJW set is cheering it. Censorship on YT, Twitter, Reddit and other sites is off the charts. The modern equivalent of burning books.
SJW?

Is that cognitive disope.... disanter..... discomb wotist?

5ohmustang

2,755 posts

116 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Its the road we are heading down unfortunately. And the SJW set is cheering it. Censorship on YT, Twitter, Reddit and other sites is off the charts. The modern equivalent of burning books.
True statement. Fahrenheit 451.


5ohmustang

2,755 posts

116 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
ecurie said:
The NRA is doing a better job of finishing of Americans than Isis & Al Queda combined, but I haven't seen Trump issuing EO's about that, although it would be a very patriotic thing to do (protecting US lives).
Foreign subject matter expert, Newsround taught you good.

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
smn159 said:
scherzkeks said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
scherzkeks said:
The modern equivalent of burning books.
Drama queen
As usual, you challenge none of the facts. For that is the SJW way.
I'm confused. Can you point out the facts in your post please;

scherzkeks said:
Its the road we are heading down unfortunately. And the SJW set is cheering it. Censorship on YT, Twitter, Reddit and other sites is off the charts. The modern equivalent of burning books.
Yeah, what he said

Any response to those requested Trump lies I posted?

Colonial

13,553 posts

206 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Does anyone else get the feeling 5wattmustang is simply playing to the crowd but mr cognitive dissonance has actually drunk the kool aid?

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Yep.

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

135 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
scherzkeks said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
scherzkeks said:
The modern equivalent of burning books.
Drama queen
As usual, you challenge none of the facts. For that is the SJW way.
Do you have facts as to why its not 'alleged'?
The issue is not whether the program allegedly existed.

The issue is that the page was edited to both remove relevant information and frame the article in a different way at a time when interest in the subject matter was high.

The timing also coincides with censorship across social media and in the MSM.


NerveAgent

3,326 posts

221 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Colonial said:
Does anyone else get the feeling 5wattmustang is simply playing to the crowd but mr cognitive dissonance has actually drunk the kool aid?
Yep,

Only the trolls and the full batstcrazies seem to be blowing the trumpet now.

p1stonhead

25,568 posts

168 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
p1stonhead said:
scherzkeks said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
scherzkeks said:
The modern equivalent of burning books.
Drama queen
As usual, you challenge none of the facts. For that is the SJW way.
Do you have facts as to why its not 'alleged'?
The issue is not whether the program allegedly existed.

The issue is that the page was edited to both remove relevant information and frame the article in a different way at a time when interest in the subject matter was high.

The timing also coincides with censorship across social media and in the MSM.
Doesnt really matter when it happened though does it. Of course people are going to be more interested in the topic around now. You cant just edit without proof I dont think so how did it go through?

If you have some evidence to the contrary, change it back rather than crying about it on here.

Finlandia

7,803 posts

232 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
tommunster10 said:
5ohmustang said:
Finlandia said:
We have an explanation!
Trump can foresee the future and his last night comment was actually meant to read three nights from now hehe

http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/polis-skot-varning...





To all concerned, no I was not one of the rioters.
Thank you sir for being straight up an honest, you have my total respect for sticking your neck out, that's far more than can be said for the EU puppets in this forum.
Who was rioting then?
From the article:
En polispatrull ska då ha befunnit sig i området för att omhänderta en efterlyst person.

I samband med detta började flera personer vid tunnelbanan kasta stenar mot polisen.

Polispatrullen på platsen ska ha känt sig så pass trängd att man tvingades avlossa skott innan man drog sig tillbaka från platsen med den efterlyste personen.

Vid 22.20 attackerades polisen en andra gång av ungdomsgänget. Det rörde sig om ett planerat, samlat angrepp där ungdomarna rusade mot polisen och kastade sten.

Polisen rubricerar händelsen som våld mot tjänsteman och våldsamt upplopp.

Google translate:
A police patrol was in the area to arrest a wanted person.

In connection with this several (masked) people started throwing stones at the police.

Police patrol on the site were forced to fire shots before pulling back from the site with the arrested person.

At 22:20 the police were attacked a second time by the youth gang. It was a planned attack where they rushed towards the police and threw stones.

The police are headlining the event as an assault on the police and violent rioting.


http://www.thelocal.se/20170221/swedish-press-phot...


As to who was rioting? Apparently locals to the area, and this is where it happened: Rinkeby.

5ohmustang

2,755 posts

116 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Yes I am playing to the crowd, my name is Norman, I really live in Ipswich, I wear a tweed jacket with elbow patches and drive an Austin Allegro. Oh and I also subscribe to the quartic.

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

135 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
scherzkeks said:
p1stonhead said:
scherzkeks said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
scherzkeks said:
The modern equivalent of burning books.
Drama queen
As usual, you challenge none of the facts. For that is the SJW way.
Do you have facts as to why its not 'alleged'?
The issue is not whether the program allegedly existed.

The issue is that the page was edited to both remove relevant information and frame the article in a different way at a time when interest in the subject matter was high.

The timing also coincides with censorship across social media and in the MSM.
Doesnt really matter when it happened though does it.
Cognitive dissonance hits hard again.

p1stonhead

25,568 posts

168 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
p1stonhead said:
scherzkeks said:
p1stonhead said:
scherzkeks said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
scherzkeks said:
The modern equivalent of burning books.
Drama queen
As usual, you challenge none of the facts. For that is the SJW way.
Do you have facts as to why its not 'alleged'?
The issue is not whether the program allegedly existed.

The issue is that the page was edited to both remove relevant information and frame the article in a different way at a time when interest in the subject matter was high.

The timing also coincides with censorship across social media and in the MSM.
Doesnt really matter when it happened though does it.
Cognitive dissonance hits hard again.
Where is my inconsistency with what I have told you? I have said consistently for you to change it back if you have evidence and to stop crying like a little girl about it.

WAAAAAAAAHHHHH someone editied a wikipedia article and I dont like it!

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
what about those trump lies, Scherzi?

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Why is cognitive dissonance seen as a bad thing?

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

135 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
scherzkeks said:
p1stonhead said:
scherzkeks said:
p1stonhead said:
scherzkeks said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
scherzkeks said:
The modern equivalent of burning books.
Drama queen
As usual, you challenge none of the facts. For that is the SJW way.
Do you have facts as to why its not 'alleged'?
The issue is not whether the program allegedly existed.

The issue is that the page was edited to both remove relevant information and frame the article in a different way at a time when interest in the subject matter was high.

The timing also coincides with censorship across social media and in the MSM.
Doesnt really matter when it happened though does it.
Cognitive dissonance hits hard again.
Where is my inconsistency with what I have told you? I have said consistently for you to change it back if you have evidence and to stop crying like a little girl about it.

WAAAAAAAAHHHHH someone editied a wikipedia article and I dont like it!
You know the timing fits well with the censorship being exerted around the web and MSM. And you can't balance that with your belief that the timing doesn't matter.

Your emotional-outburstesque final sentence is also a nice tell.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Trump deleting tweets ok?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED