45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2
Discussion
Bill said:
He's working on plan b after discovering that sharks with frickin' laser beams won't survive in the desert.
Not sure if serious. Have you seen the Sharknado documentaries? Apparently a desert could quickly become covered by shark-infested water. They kept quiet about the size of the laser beam threat. Don't tell me it was based on fake news...5ohmustang said:
The irony of saying "the US spends too much on their military" coming from a country that doesn't even have a single aircraft carrier. Nevermind not having the money to build 1 aircraft carrier, but then having the share it with the quitting French.
That's not irony.Also only eight countries currently have them, and one has more than the rest combined
Bill said:
turbobloke said:
Mocking was the least of it during the election campaign! Then he won...
And the mocking continues. That makes him sad. Very sad.Mr Snrub said:
Bill said:
Are people really happy Trump is trying to surround himself with yes men who won't ask awkward questions?
(And what did the Mail do wrong? Was it an unflattering shot of Melania's side boob?)
didn't they falsely claim she used to work as an escort?(And what did the Mail do wrong? Was it an unflattering shot of Melania's side boob?)
So, if what the Mail said is true, she meets Trump's criteria for immigrants who must be deported (he'd stated those who broke visa rules must go even if they're now legal).
Bill said:
Are people really happy Trump is trying to surround himself with yes men who won't ask awkward questions?
That's not a realistic prospect in terms of the media, but it's pretty much SOP for political assistants of various types - which goes some way to explaining how they (the leaders being assisted) can get so much so wrong.Haven't watched CNN for ages but on Trump especially the BBC has ceased to be a news organisation and has simply been running a campaign against him.
Awkward questions and public scrutiny are one thing but it's hardly surprising that he would exclude them.
People can call the BBC "credible" all they like but it should be judged on its output and its output on Trump has been a joke.
Awkward questions and public scrutiny are one thing but it's hardly surprising that he would exclude them.
People can call the BBC "credible" all they like but it should be judged on its output and its output on Trump has been a joke.
SKP555 said:
Haven't watched CNN for ages but on Trump especially the BBC has ceased to be a news organisation and has simply been running a campaign against him.
Awkward questions and public scrutiny are one thing but it's hardly surprising that he would exclude them.
People can call the BBC "credible" all they like but it should be judged on its output and its output on Trump has been a joke.
And Trump's output has been?Awkward questions and public scrutiny are one thing but it's hardly surprising that he would exclude them.
People can call the BBC "credible" all they like but it should be judged on its output and its output on Trump has been a joke.
Alpinestars said:
SKP555 said:
Haven't watched CNN for ages but on Trump especially the BBC has ceased to be a news organisation and has simply been running a campaign against him.
Awkward questions and public scrutiny are one thing but it's hardly surprising that he would exclude them.
People can call the BBC "credible" all they like but it should be judged on its output and its output on Trump has been a joke.
And Trump's output has been?Awkward questions and public scrutiny are one thing but it's hardly surprising that he would exclude them.
People can call the BBC "credible" all they like but it should be judged on its output and its output on Trump has been a joke.
turbobloke said:
Alpinestars said:
SKP555 said:
Haven't watched CNN for ages but on Trump especially the BBC has ceased to be a news organisation and has simply been running a campaign against him.
Awkward questions and public scrutiny are one thing but it's hardly surprising that he would exclude them.
People can call the BBC "credible" all they like but it should be judged on its output and its output on Trump has been a joke.
And Trump's output has been?Awkward questions and public scrutiny are one thing but it's hardly surprising that he would exclude them.
People can call the BBC "credible" all they like but it should be judged on its output and its output on Trump has been a joke.
I really don't want to set off Greg66 again cos it was pointless last time and took up several pages and then he started another thread in website feedback
B'stard Child said:
turbobloke said:
Alpinestars said:
SKP555 said:
Haven't watched CNN for ages but on Trump especially the BBC has ceased to be a news organisation and has simply been running a campaign against him.
Awkward questions and public scrutiny are one thing but it's hardly surprising that he would exclude them.
People can call the BBC "credible" all they like but it should be judged on its output and its output on Trump has been a joke.
And Trump's output has been?Awkward questions and public scrutiny are one thing but it's hardly surprising that he would exclude them.
People can call the BBC "credible" all they like but it should be judged on its output and its output on Trump has been a joke.
I really don't want to set off Greg66 again cos it was pointless last time and took up several pages and then he started another thread in website feedback
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff