45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2

45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

133 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Zod said:
"freefall"!

Don't wriggle. Just admit that you have frequently expressed doubts or more precisely disbelief of the official story of what happened to WTC 1,2 and 7.That's a conspiracy theory.
Freefall speeds are documented in the NIST report. There are two groups of respected professionals in the field offering two versions of the timing for the collapse: A/E and NIST.
NIST altered its own findings following A/E's work. The issue needs to be addressed.

No consipiracy, but certainly a questionable matter.

You, on the other hand, are a Russia Truther.

Where is your evidence, truther?

Europa1

10,923 posts

187 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Freefall speeds are documented in the NIST report. There are two groups of respected professionals in the field offering two versions of the timing for the collapse: A/E and NIST.
NIST altered its own findings following A/E's work. The issue needs to be addressed.

No consipiracy, but certainly a questionable matter.

You, on the other hand, are a Russia Truther.

Where is your evidence, truther?
And you mock others for being triggered...

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

133 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Europa1 said:
And you mock others for being triggered...
Yes, I do. Facts are facts. smile

Zod

35,295 posts

257 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Zod said:
"freefall"!

Don't wriggle. Just admit that you have frequently expressed doubts or more precisely disbelief of the official story of what happened to WTC 1,2 and 7.That's a conspiracy theory.
Freefall speeds are documented in the NIST report. There are two groups of respected professionals in the field offering two versions of the timing for the collapse: A/E and NIST.
NIST altered its own findings following A/E's work. The issue needs to be addressed.

No consipiracy, but certainly a questionable matter.

You, on the other hand, are a Russia Truther.

Where is your evidence, truther?
No, there are not two groups of respected professionals. There is one, the one that says that the buildings were destroyed as a result of terrorists flying planes into them.

Find a post in which I've mentioned the Russia story.

Double fail.

anonymous-user

53 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Greg66 said:
Tell us about 911 and Sandy Hook again. Then we will tell you about your credibility again.
Show me where I have advocated any specific conspiracy theory.
rofl

Well, let's see.

There was the one propounded by Kelly AnnBeavis. That microwave ovens can turn into cameras.

scherzkeks said:
Greg66 said:
Kellyanne Conway, live, on film, on the subject of how Obama could have bugged Trump: "Microwaves that turn into cameras, et cetera. So we know that that is just a fact of modern life".

To which the interviewer responds, apparently without irony: "Sure, yeah".

What. The. fk?
Warning: may further trigger you.

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/8391557150591...

Will he accept reality, or will he double down again? wink
Then there's the conspiracy theory that the Russian connection is, well, itself a conspiracy theory set in train to discredit Trump:

scherzkeks said:
The Russian conspiracy theory on its last legs. Too bad, so sad. hehe

"Intel Chair: 'No Collusion Between Trump and Russia... Leak Is The Only Crime'"

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-19/intel-cha...
And then there's the conspiracy theory that Sandy Hook was a false flag hoax

scherzkeks said:
p1stonhead said:
scherzkeks said:
p1stonhead said:
The below quote are directly from his article.

"What is disturbing to me is that I do not know if Sandy Hook is a real event or a hoax."

"Was Sandy Hook a drill that was turned into a public hoax by the use of doctored photos in the interest of an agenda?"

"Why not instead produce the death certificates of the murdered children if not photos? Why not prove with utility bills, school bus routes, and other evidence that the school was in operation and not closed due to numerous problems that the school is claimed to have had?"

"In place of evidence such as bodies, body bags, death certificates, we have what appear to be faked photographs. Why?"

These means he isnt sure it happened. That means he is mental.

Edited by anonymous-user on Friday 24th March 10:51
Yes, that would be demonstrative of critical thinking.

Perhaps edit your post again, it reinforces your insecurity on the topic. wink
You call it critical thinking. Anyone with a brain calls him/you a conspiracy nutcase.
I personally have no opinion on SH. Don't know enough. I respect that PCR is openly critical of it, particularly given his distinguished background.

I am amused by your insecurity on and inability to discuss the issue. smile
(BTW, if it were, why hasn't PCR produced a living breathing talking but supposedly dead SH child victim. Shouldn't be too hard if he is right).

And then there's your 911 truther adherence. That's off the scale nuts.

The fact that you don't align yourself to a particular conspiracy theory really isn't a positive. Any more than it would be for morbidly obese person to observe that they like to sweep up everything on the buffet table rather than stick to the same dish.


And that's just the nutjob conspiracy theories. We haven't even touched on your cognitive dissonance over the tax return (where you were too busy washing Trump's balls and sneering at CNN to work out the real problem with what he released).







SilverSixer

8,202 posts

150 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Zod said:
scherzkeks said:
Zod said:
"freefall"!

Don't wriggle. Just admit that you have frequently expressed doubts or more precisely disbelief of the official story of what happened to WTC 1,2 and 7.That's a conspiracy theory.
Freefall speeds are documented in the NIST report. There are two groups of respected professionals in the field offering two versions of the timing for the collapse: A/E and NIST.
NIST altered its own findings following A/E's work. The issue needs to be addressed.

No consipiracy, but certainly a questionable matter.

You, on the other hand, are a Russia Truther.

Where is your evidence, truther?
No, there are not two groups of respected professionals. There is one, the one that says that the buildings were destroyed as a result of terrorists flying planes into them.

Find a post in which I've mentioned the Russia story.

Double fail.
Edmund: Look, there’s no need to panic. Someone in the crew will
know how to steer this thing.

Rum: The crew, milord?

Edmund: Yes, the crew.

Rum: What crew?

Edmund: I was under the impression that it was common maritime practice
for a ship to have a crew.

Rum: Opinion is divided on the subject.

Edmund: Oh, really? [starting to get the picture]

Rum: Yahs. All the other captains say it is; I say it isn’t.

Edmund: Oh, God; Mad as a brush.

p1stonhead

25,489 posts

166 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Change the law so that it's illegal for the media to report on me?


scherzkeks

4,460 posts

133 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Greg66 said:
The fact that you don't align yourself to a particular conspiracy theory really isn't a positive.
rofl

Thank you for conceding.




p1stonhead

25,489 posts

166 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Greg66 said:
The fact that you don't align yourself to a particular conspiracy theory really isn't a positive.
rofl

Thank you for conceding.
Do you think Sandy Hook happened as reported by pretty much everyone in the world?

Fairly simple question.

anonymous-user

53 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Greg66 said:
The fact that you don't align yourself to a particular conspiracy theory really isn't a positive.
rofl

Thank you for conceding.
You are well beyond the limits of measurable human stupidity.

Truly, you're the personification of the Dunning Kruger effect (wiki: a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is).

Eric Mc

121,775 posts

264 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Dunning Kruger applies to an awful lot of the internet.

rxtx

6,016 posts

209 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Greg66 said:
You are well beyond the limits of measurable human stupidity.

Truly, you're the personification of the Dunning Kruger effect (wiki: a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is).
Just ignore him and he might go away.

rscott

14,690 posts

190 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Greg66 said:
Tell us about 911 and Sandy Hook again. Then we will tell you about your credibility again.
Show me where I have advocated any specific conspiracy theory.

Then we can talk about why you are a Russia Truther. smile
Simple question - do you believe Sandy Hook actually happened and 20 children were killed?

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

97 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
So it would seem that dark forces are DETERMINED to muzzle free opinion and speech in the US.

TTwiggy

11,500 posts

203 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Sylvaforever said:
So it would seem that dark forces are DETERMINED to muzzle free opinion and speech in the US.
AKA "spouting bks and talking crap".

Eric Mc

121,775 posts

264 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Probably along with Godwin's Law.

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

97 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
TTwiggy said:
Sylvaforever said:
So it would seem that dark forces are DETERMINED to muzzle free opinion and speech in the US.
AKA "spouting bks and talking crap".
Hmm, you seen a trifle agitated. One man's bks, as you so neatly put it, is another's truth. Stopping freedom of expression, like it or not, is so EU.

Eric Mc

121,775 posts

264 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Opinion does not equal fact.

A person is perfectly entitled to hold an opinion that is 100% absolute bks.

Just because the belief is truly and sincerely held does not magically turn that belief into a fact.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

283 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Anyhoo
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/30/us/politics/dev...

Insider dealing basically, I think the phrase here is "no s*** Sherlock".

Still think the powers that be were fishing in another direction and the Trumps empire got snagged by default and not directly.

And his personality is coming out after the Freedom Caucus, the threats are quite interesting. He could denude himself of a majority?

unrepentant

21,212 posts

255 months

Thursday 30th March 2017
quotequote all
Deputy WH chief of staff Katie Walsh has been fired by Trump following the healthcare debacle. Bad news for Reince Priebus who is seriously wounded as he hand picked her and she followed him from the RNC. Can't be too long before Priebus follows her through the door.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED