House of Commons shooting?
Discussion
bmw535i said:
They shouldn't be released if they belong to a terrorist organisation.
I don't know, do you?
That's not how this country works, nor any free thinking society, but I guess we're back to your "lock them up forever if they have even the slightest suspicion of a connection to a terrorist", except for you, because you've told us you're OK. I don't know, do you?
You said he was radicalising people, I just wondered how many he'd succeeded in radicalising.
Gavia said:
That's not how this country works, nor any free thinking society, but I guess we're back to your "lock them up forever if they have even the slightest suspicion of a connection to a terrorist", except for you, because you've told us you're OK.
You said he was radicalising people, I just wondered how many he'd succeeded in radicalising.
I know it isn't, I just think it should.You said he was radicalising people, I just wondered how many he'd succeeded in radicalising.
I don't know how many, but it is quite widely reported he has done so.
For example:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-i...
bmw535i said:
Gavia said:
That's not how this country works, nor any free thinking society, but I guess we're back to your "lock them up forever if they have even the slightest suspicion of a connection to a terrorist", except for you, because you've told us you're OK.
You said he was radicalising people, I just wondered how many he'd succeeded in radicalising.
I know it isn't, I just think it should.You said he was radicalising people, I just wondered how many he'd succeeded in radicalising.
I don't know how many, but it is quite widely reported he has done so.
For example:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-i...
bmw535i said:
Yes, along with those he's radicalised. I'm not sure why you're confused, this has already been discussed.
What about those on the outside now being radicalised by all their mates being locked up forever?Actually don't bother, I watched your earlier attempts at this and they weren't very successful
Gavia said:
bmw535i said:
Yes, along with those he's radicalised. I'm not sure why you're confused, this has already been discussed.
What about those on the outside now being radicalised by all their mates being locked up forever?Actually don't bother, I watched your earlier attempts at this and they weren't very successful
g4ry13 said:
This picture has been going around apparently (with various captions) - not sure whether that's fake, some say it is and others that it's not and they've seen other angles of it too.
I've seen a lot of this online and the character assassination of this woman based on a single moment in time in an utterly chaotic scenario is absolutely disgraceful. Can't believe the number of people jumping on the bandwagon. (not meaning here but twitter etc.)People scream and shout about how she should be helping etc. yet all we know about that immediate scenario is that there are already 7 people around the victim, 5 of whom just appear to be standing there.
Edited by Patrick Bateman on Saturday 25th March 02:52
Gavia said:
Now I'm thoroughly confused. He should stay in jail where he has radicalised people, as it's safer for us all that he does that
I know, it's almost as if the situation can't be easily resolved by a few guys posting on a car-themed website!Maybe it's just a bit more complex than we thought?
SKP555 said:
Some sensible stuff in that. jdw100 said:
Who thinks it doesn't?
p1stonhead said:
To be clear, personally I am not bothered in the slightest nor scared/terrified by it and agree with you, its a non issue in my head in terms of potential risk.
But if this is now the weapon of choice, the risk is a lot higher in my mind than being blown up. Still not bothered, but the risk has surely gone up from just above zero, to very slightly higher than just above just above zero.
This person appears to think there isn't a risk. There are several other similar comments in this thread.But if this is now the weapon of choice, the risk is a lot higher in my mind than being blown up. Still not bothered, but the risk has surely gone up from just above zero, to very slightly higher than just above just above zero.
bmw535i said:
jdw100 said:
Who thinks it doesn't?
p1stonhead said:
To be clear, personally I am not bothered in the slightest nor scared/terrified by it and agree with you, its a non issue in my head in terms of potential risk.
But if this is now the weapon of choice, the risk is a lot higher in my mind than being blown up. Still not bothered, but the risk has surely gone up from just above zero, to very slightly higher than just above just above zero.
This person appears to think there isn't a risk. There are several other similar comments in this thread.But if this is now the weapon of choice, the risk is a lot higher in my mind than being blown up. Still not bothered, but the risk has surely gone up from just above zero, to very slightly higher than just above just above zero.
"The risk is a lot higher"
"The risk has surely gone up"
I am with pistonhead. There is a risk. It is still small. It can't be eliminated. The security services would appear to have stopped other in incidents over the years.
You don't seem to have answered the many questions raised about your internement idea.
You appear to be very, very scared of terrorism. They have terrorised you. In which case they are winning. But the risk is tiny.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff