House of Commons shooting?
Discussion
bmw535i said:
Alpinestars said:
bmw535i said:
Alpinestars said:
What terrorist attacks have they committed?
any in the ukbmw535i said:
Can you think of any terrorists who have committed terror acts in the uk who weren't known to the security services beforehand?
Step 1
BlackLabel said:
Step 2turbobloke said:
Relesed with no further action - not quite.
The national DNA database by stealth will have been updated. Every little helps, no reason is too serious.
Step 3The national DNA database by stealth will have been updated. Every little helps, no reason is too serious.
La Liga said:
how do you know they weren't on it prior to these arrests?
Step 4bmw535i said:
I've no doubt they were 'known' already
Step 5Alpinestars said:
Because?
Step 6bmw535i said:
Do you know of any terror attacks in the UK where the perpetrators were not known to the security services?
Step 7Alpinestars said:
What terrorist attacks have they committed?
Step 8 - this is where your autistic style comes in. You're not following the conversation. bmw535i said:
any in the uk
Distilled, some people were held on suspicion of terrorism. They were released without charge. You have no doubt they are already know to police. I ask why you think that. You make a statement about all terrorists to date being known by the authorities - in the context of the question, that means you think these people are terrorists. I ask what terrorist acts they committed. You said "all". Do you follow or is it too complex for you?
The question again. What terrorist acts have the people who were released without charge, committed?
Alpinestars said:
Distilled, some people were held on suspicion of terrorism. They were released without charge. You have no doubt they are already know to police. I ask why you think that. You make a statement about all terrorists to date being known by the authorities - in the context of the question, that means you think these people are terrorists. I ask what terrorist acts they committed. You said "all".
Do you follow or is it too complex for you?
The question again. What terrorist acts have the people who were released without charge, committed?
My original question which I quoted again, was asked several days ago. Nobody seems able to answer itDo you follow or is it too complex for you?
The question again. What terrorist acts have the people who were released without charge, committed?
bmw535i said:
Alpinestars said:
Distilled, some people were held on suspicion of terrorism. They were released without charge. You have no doubt they are already know to police. I ask why you think that. You make a statement about all terrorists to date being known by the authorities - in the context of the question, that means you think these people are terrorists. I ask what terrorist acts they committed. You said "all".
Do you follow or is it too complex for you?
The question again. What terrorist acts have the people who were released without charge, committed?
My original question which I quoted again, was asked several days ago. Nobody seems able to answer itDo you follow or is it too complex for you?
The question again. What terrorist acts have the people who were released without charge, committed?
Alpinestars said:
You're still not following. Step 1 of this conversation was as set out in my post. Obfuscation, bullst and eating as much as you can of your data. You don't need to eat it all, you do know that? Are you going to answer the question or not?
I'm not sure I need to follow anything. Nobody has been able to answer the question I posed several days ago.If you can think of anyone who has committed an act of terrorism and wasn't known to the security services, then say so.
It is not a trick question.
bmw535i said:
Alpinestars said:
You're still not following. Step 1 of this conversation was as set out in my post. Obfuscation, bullst and eating as much as you can of your data. You don't need to eat it all, you do know that? Are you going to answer the question or not?
I'm not sure I need to follow anything. Nobody has been able to answer the question I posed several days ago.If you can think of anyone who has committed an act of terrorism and wasn't known to the security services, then say so.
It is not a trick question.
Alpinestars said:
Neither was mine but it seems to have tricked you. Thanks for trying though.
I don't feel I have been tricked by your question.I would genuinely like to know if any terrorist acts have been perpetrated by anyone unknown to the security services. I cannot seem to find any.
bmw535i said:
Alpinestars said:
Neither was mine but it seems to have tricked you. Thanks for trying though.
I don't feel I have been tricked by your question.I would genuinely like to know if any terrorist acts have been perpetrated by anyone unknown to the security services. I cannot seem to find any.
bmw535i said:
desolate said:
bmw535i said:
Gavia said:
50 odd pages of you blabbering on about internment gives the game away.
I don't recall saying my idea of internment was exclusive to muslims? bmw535i said:
Alpinestars said:
I'd line you to answer my question. Rather than put out a new question to me. Once you've answered mine, I'll answer yours. How's that?
I asked mine several days ago. It hasn't been answered. I'm fairly sure I know why that is.Do I take it you can't answer mine? Shall we leave it as it is. Because it and you are getting very tired and boring.
Alpinestars said:
Irrelevant. You didn't ask me the question, I've no context to your question.
Do I take it you can't answer mine? Shall we leave it as it is. Because it and you are getting very tired and boring.
I have no desire to have any confrontation with you. I can only assume there are not any terror attacks in the UK perpetrated by unknown terrorists.Do I take it you can't answer mine? Shall we leave it as it is. Because it and you are getting very tired and boring.
I don't think anyone who has been released has already committed an act of terror. All those who have committed an act of terror are known to the police though - as far as I'm aware. If you can name some who aren't, I'd be interested to hear it.
Edited by anonymous-user on Saturday 1st April 23:03
Gavia said:
those who are blind in their hate of Islam.
There was a rather stupid Northern lad on YouTube decrying them for their "Muslamic ray guns" a few years back. Some claim he was saying rape gangs, but was so dense that he could barely speak his mother tongue.
hence why people like me who are capable of critical thinking like to take the mickey out of people like you who aren't, by using that word.
That stupid northern youth is hardly a shining beacon but sadly at the time was protesting something we later found to be true. Yet people like you who deride the concerns and experiences of other people have pushed any kind of speaking about it into some kind of witch hunt.
Were the chaps wrong about rape gangs?
You can have serious concerns with large chunks of Islam, there are few revisionist sects a member of one was killed in Scotland of all places bringing religious violence that was through no way caused by invading countries for oil or any of that spiel. No. It was because of the hatred for a generally peaceful break away sect who see someone other than a warlord as their prophet. How about the clashes with reformists like Maajid Nawaz, called a government stooge for his amazing work with quilliam, his book co-wrote with Sam Harris is stellar too.
There are under currents of hating brown people that can piggyback on the criticism of islam I will agree but groups like the edl did try to separate from those individuals and most with concerns or dislikes of parts of Islam deserve a bit more benefit of the doubt when coming to the racist tar brush.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff