House of Commons shooting?

[anonymous-user]

Zod said:

bmw535i said:

I'm still unfamiliar with the word muslamic

Are you familiar with google.co.uk?

Yes

[Alpinestars]

bmw535i said:

Alpinestars said:

Irrelevant. You didn't ask me the question, I've no context to your question.

Do I take it you can't answer mine? Shall we leave it as it is. Because it and you are getting very tired and boring.

I have no desire to have any confrontation with you. I can only assume there are not any terror attacks in the UK perpetrated by unknown terrorists.

I don't think anyone who has been released has already committed an act of terror. All those who have committed an act of terror are known to the police though - as far as I'm aware. If you can name some who aren't, I'd be interested to hear it.

Edited by bmw535i on Saturday 1st April 23:03

Still not answering the question.

I'll help a little. All terrorist acts in the UK may well have been committed by people "known" to the authorities. That does not mean that those who were released without charge, are either terrorists, or were previously known to the authorities. The two are not mutually exclusive.

For the 4th or 5th time, can you answer the question I posed?

One can't make statements like "they were released, but are terrorists, and should be interned".

[anonymous-user]

Alpinestars said:

Still not answering the question.

I'll help a little. All terrorist acts in the UK may well have been committed by people "known" to the authorities. That does not mean that those who were released without charge, are either terrorists, or were previously known to the authorities. The two are not mutually exclusive.

For the 4th or 5th time, can you answer the question I posed?

One can't make statements like "they were released, but are terrorists, and should be interned".

I don't recall stating all those released without charge are terrorists or previously known.

Thank you for answering my question.

[Alpinestars]

bmw535i said:

Alpinestars said:

Still not answering the question.

I'll help a little. All terrorist acts in the UK may well have been committed by people "known" to the authorities. That does not mean that those who were released without charge, are either terrorists, or were previously known to the authorities. The two are not mutually exclusive.

For the 4th or 5th time, can you answer the question I posed?

One can't make statements like "they were released, but are terrorists, and should be interned".

I don't recall stating all those released without charge are terrorists or previously known.

Thank you for answering my question.

I didn't say you made that statement.

How about answering mine now? It doesn't matter if you're wrong.

[dandarez]

Not followed this much but did read the other day that one witness to one of the many arrests, a neighbour (not sure which area it was) said the first she knew was hearing a door being broken in.

Compensation and damage claims to follow then?
I would!

Wonder what sort of intelligence gets a dozen(?) people arrested (not for fly-tipping, but suspected terrorism - they were 'terror raids') in different areas in the early hours and then a few days later all are released without charge?

And the cost (£s)?

[anonymous-user]

Alpinestars said:

bmw535i said:

Alpinestars said:

Still not answering the question.

I'll help a little. All terrorist acts in the UK may well have been committed by people "known" to the authorities. That does not mean that those who were released without charge, are either terrorists, or were previously known to the authorities. The two are not mutually exclusive.

For the 4th or 5th time, can you answer the question I posed?

One can't make statements like "they were released, but are terrorists, and should be interned".

I don't recall stating all those released without charge are terrorists or previously known.

Thank you for answering my question.

I didn't say you made that statement.

How about answering mine now? It doesn't matter if you're wrong.

I thought when you said that you were implying I'd said it.

I have answered your question.

Alpinestars said:

What terrorist attacks have they committed?

bmw535i said:

I don't think anyone who has been released has already committed an act of terror.

Edited by anonymous-user on Saturday 1st April 23:03

[Zod]

bmw535i said:

Zod said:

bmw535i said:

I'm still unfamiliar with the word muslamic

Are you familiar with google.co.uk?

Yes

So, why didn't you google it? You'd have understood immediately.

[anonymous-user]

Zod said:

So, why didn't you google it? You'd have understood immediately.

It's not a word I or the oxford dictionary understand I'm afraid.

[anonymous-user]

bmw535i said:

Zod said:

So, why didn't you google it? You'd have understood immediately.

It's not a word I or the oxford dictionary understand I'm afraid.

No surprise.

Google confirms that OED doesn't recognise it as well.

[anonymous-user]

desolate said:

No surprise.

Google confirms that OED doesn't recognise it as well.

I did think that googling it would probably reveal it wasn't a word.

Thanks for confirming.

[Alpinestars]

bmw535i said:

Alpinestars said:

bmw535i said:

Alpinestars said:

Still not answering the question.

I'll help a little. All terrorist acts in the UK may well have been committed by people "known" to the authorities. That does not mean that those who were released without charge, are either terrorists, or were previously known to the authorities. The two are not mutually exclusive.

For the 4th or 5th time, can you answer the question I posed?

One can't make statements like "they were released, but are terrorists, and should be interned".

I don't recall stating all those released without charge are terrorists or previously known.

Thank you for answering my question.

I didn't say you made that statement.

How about answering mine now? It doesn't matter if you're wrong.

I thought when you said that you were implying I'd said it.

I have answered your question.

Alpinestars said:

What terrorist attacks have they committed?

bmw535i said:

I don't think anyone who has been released has already committed an act of terror.

Edited by bmw535i on Saturday 1st April 23:03

You haven't answered the question. Try again. Attempt 6?

[anonymous-user]

bmw535i said:

I did think that googling it would probably reveal it wasn't a word.

Thanks for confirming.

If you didn't google it - how did you know it wasn't a word in the OED?

Words exist outside of the OED - it's an exciting world out there.

Edited by anonymous-user on Saturday 1st April 23:47

[anonymous-user]

Alpinestars said:

bmw535i said:

Alpinestars said:

bmw535i said:

Alpinestars said:

Still not answering the question.

I'll help a little. All terrorist acts in the UK may well have been committed by people "known" to the authorities. That does not mean that those who were released without charge, are either terrorists, or were previously known to the authorities. The two are not mutually exclusive.

For the 4th or 5th time, can you answer the question I posed?

One can't make statements like "they were released, but are terrorists, and should be interned".

I don't recall stating all those released without charge are terrorists or previously known.

Thank you for answering my question.

I didn't say you made that statement.

How about answering mine now? It doesn't matter if you're wrong.

I thought when you said that you were implying I'd said it.

I have answered your question.

Alpinestars said:

What terrorist attacks have they committed?

bmw535i said:

I don't think anyone who has been released has already committed an act of terror.

Edited by anonymous-user on Saturday 1st April 23:03

You haven't answered the question. Try again. Attempt 6?

You: What terrorist acts have they committed?

Me: I don't think they have already committed a terrorist act.

Please advise on how I can answer the question better. If you would like to revise the question, please feel free.

[Alpinestars]

bmw535i said:

You: What terrorist acts have they committed?

Me: I don't think they have already committed a terrorist act.

Please advise on how I can answer the question better. If you would like to revise the question, please feel free.

Nope, you're still struggling to answer the question. Want another chance?

[anonymous-user]

Alpinestars said:

Nope, you're still struggling to answer the question. Want another chance?

I think I've answered it.

Anybody released hasn't already committed an act of terror. As far as I know, all those who have committed an act of terror have been known to the security services

[Alpinestars]

bmw535i said:

Alpinestars said:

Nope, you're still struggling to answer the question. Want another chance?

I think I've answered it.

Anybody released hasn't already committed an act of terror. As far as I know, all those who have committed an act of terror have been known to the security services

Nope. You're getting close to 10 attempts now. Poor effort.

[anonymous-user]

Alpinestars said:

Nope. You're getting close to 10 attempts now. Poor effort.

Fair enough, I suppose not everyone is going to like the answer to their question.

[Alpinestars]

bmw535i said:

Alpinestars said:

Nope. You're getting close to 10 attempts now. Poor effort.

Fair enough, I suppose not everyone is going to like the answer to their question.

An answer would be a start. I'll let you know the quality of the answer when you provide it. Attempt 10?

[Gavia]

MrBrightSi said:

Check out the pathetic superiority in that post.

That stupid northern youth is hardly a shining beacon but sadly at the time was protesting something we later found to be true. Yet people like you who deride the concerns and experiences of other people have pushed any kind of speaking about it into some kind of witch hunt.

Were the chaps wrong about rape gangs?

You can have serious concerns with large chunks of Islam, there are few revisionist sects a member of one was killed in Scotland of all places bringing religious violence that was through no way caused by invading countries for oil or any of that spiel. No. It was because of the hatred for a generally peaceful break away sect who see someone other than a warlord as their prophet. How about the clashes with reformists like Maajid Nawaz, called a government stooge for his amazing work with quilliam, his book co-wrote with Sam Harris is stellar too.

There are under currents of hating brown people that can piggyback on the criticism of islam I will agree but groups like the edl did try to separate from those individuals and most with concerns or dislikes of parts of Islam deserve a bit more benefit of the doubt when coming to the racist tar brush.

Superiority? Not really I grew up and live in the same area as that lad, the difference is I chose not to turn to petty crime, thuggery and drugs like he did. Still I'm sure he and his mates in the EDL are all jolly nice chaps amd he makes a great spokesman with his glowing pillar of the community references.

Rape gangs? I love the sensationalist description, it suggests they're on a rape rampage charging through towns on a mission from Allah. The reality is that they are disgusting lowlife scum grooming young girls amd getting them onto drugs and into prostitution, much like many white people have and are doing currently. None of it has anything to do with their religion. Paedophilia is not the preserve of Islam either. They do it, Christians do it and so on. It's disgusting, but carried out by people of all colour, creed and religion. Google Operation Yew Tree, or the lead singer of the Lodt Prophets, or Cyril Smith and so on for proof of that.

The EDL are a bunch of racist skinhead thugs who've found a way to get out in large groups amd have a ruck. In the 70s they'd have been football hooligans, in the 80s flying pickets at miners strikes and so on.

I've read some of your other posts amd threads and see where your views lie too, I won't be engaging with you again.

[anonymous-user]

Alpinestars said:

An answer would be a start. I'll let you know the quality of the answer when you provide it. Attempt 10?

I have repeated my answer several times. If you don't like it, then I apologise for that, but my answer remains the same.

I don't think anybody released after an investigation into terrorism has already committed an act of terror.

I dare say there may be some who slip through the net, but I don't know of any.