FTX/Sam Bankman-Fried

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
SWoll said:
Not stupid, greedy. And this has affected a lot more than rich people.

Many of the the "influencers" on social media have been pushing FTX hard for a while now and funnily enough are all now on apology tours..
This.

It amazes me how many perfectly normal people, who can't really afford to lose a chunk of cash, get involved in all this stuff. I can only assume it is the gambling and 'get rich quick' aspects of it that attract people. Like sticking your hard earned £1000 on a horse and praying that the outcome changes your life. Same mentality, same attraction.

I was chatting to people in the pub about it all a few months ago, and a guy I know who is a plasterer was showing me his crypto app and he had significant amounts of his money lodged in all kinds of 'currencies' that I have never even heard of.

ChocolateFrog

25,618 posts

174 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
Pretty funny that investors put in over $200m based on a conference call where he played video games exclusively.

If only there were some warning signs.

isaldiri

18,668 posts

169 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Stanford University grads.

Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos fraud, on bail)
Do Kwon (Terra blockchain, $45bn crypto crash in May 2022, in jail)
Sam Bankman-Fried (FTX)
Caroline Ellison (FTX / Alameda)
Bodes well for Sunak then..... hehe

Miocene

1,344 posts

158 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
Friend of a friend is heavily into crypto, and has done very very well out of it.

Last time I saw him he was wearing an Alameda Research t-shirt. Wonder how he's doing at the moment!

jshell

11,049 posts

206 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
Am I correct in saying that the $billions in Govt Ukrainian aid donations just disappeared with FTX?

bloomen

6,936 posts

160 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
SWoll said:
Not stupid, greedy. And this has affected a lot more than rich people.
I think it's as much to do with not wanting it to be true and wanting to believe what's put in front of you. People want to believe in other people if they like what they're hawking, even if it's painfully clear that it's a crock of st.

And herd mentality kicks in too. If x VC thinks this guy is awesome, even though he's a a blatant dunderhead, then maybe I should think that too?

It takes a long time for things like this to finally dawn on people.

I remember when Mt Gox went down. People were saying things like 'no way, it's too big to fail' as if it was HSBC. In reality it was one French autist on a beach ball.


jshell said:
Am I correct in saying that the $billions in Govt Ukrainian aid donations just disappeared with FTX?
I think it was a pure crypto to fiat arrangement so it was sucked out as soon as it went in. I assume other FTX users paid for it.

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

254 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
The Hypno-Toad said:
Fell down a massive rabbit hole about this yesterday, amazing stuff.

But the one thing you take away from this is.... REALLY!!

REALLY! You couldn't see this was a con? You couldn't take one look at their staff and think "they're the kind of people I want looking after my millions!" You didn't think the completely invisible Chinese sleeping partner was not even a slightly dodgy set up? You didn't even look at his name and think "Bankman-Fried?? Hmm??? He's a Bankman and fried in American slang means "out of your head on dope"... That didn't raise any alarm bells at all? Not even a tiny bit?

Jesus, some rich people are just unbelievably stupid.

Well, since his dad's name is Bankman, and his mum's name is Fried, I don't think nominative determinism should be the number one investment consideration.

Is there a name he could have had that would have seen you enthusiastically pumping the cash in?



honest_delboy

1,517 posts

201 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
Is there a name he could have had that would have seen you enthusiastically pumping the cash in?
Sam Solid-Goldyield

Fundoreen

4,180 posts

84 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
F1 cars are plastered in various crypto sponsorship. But you do assume most of the people crowded on the grid and in the hospitality area are crooks.
I remember the chain letter stuff from 90s workplaces and the increasing pushy nature of people trying to get you involved.
Just happening on an epic global borderless scale now.

Dummies need to realize the person imploring them to join in is trying to save themselves.
When people think they are onto a good deal they are very quiet and secretive.

carinaman

21,335 posts

173 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
David Scott on UK Column News discussing the 99 second video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow-MN7qJnIY and Warren Buffett video.

This Ponsi scheme wearing a Crypto mask isn't good news for Digital Central Bank Currencies?

digger_R

1,807 posts

207 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
The interesting parts of this go a little deeper - absolutely flew through the regulatory process for approval in the US. Massive donations to political parties and some 'interesting' connections to regulators.
Who knows what the truth is - but I honestly doubt it's some 30 year old mastermind kid scammed everyone.
An exchange doesn't become that big unless doors are opened for it - especially in the USA.

Carl_Manchester

12,309 posts

263 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
honest_delboy said:
SpeckledJim said:
Is there a name he could have had that would have seen you enthusiastically pumping the cash in?
Sam Solid-Goldyield
"Hello, Mr. Honest Delboy, my name is Sam Solid-Goldyield, I am calling from Stratton Oakmont in New York. How are you today?"

z4RRSchris

11,348 posts

180 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
digger_R said:
The interesting parts of this go a little deeper - absolutely flew through the regulatory process for approval in the US. Massive donations to political parties and some 'interesting' connections to regulators.
Who knows what the truth is - but I honestly doubt it's some 30 year old mastermind kid scammed everyone.
An exchange doesn't become that big unless doors are opened for it - especially in the USA.
the exchange aspect wasnt the dodgey bit was it? just a normal exchange.

they were yeild farming tokens with deposits then their hedge fund held 14bn of these things, which they then borrowed against for trading. they also ran the fund as the MM but had access to the exchange placed trades so knew where the market was.

carinaman

21,335 posts

173 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
digger_R said:
The interesting parts of this go a little deeper - absolutely flew through the regulatory process for approval in the US. Massive donations to political parties and some 'interesting' connections to regulators.
Who knows what the truth is - but I honestly doubt it's some 30 year old mastermind kid scammed everyone.
An exchange doesn't become that big unless doors are opened for it - especially in the USA.
It's political and the global lizard elite overlords are involved?

https://www.bhute.com/video/BJnQPmKtJog/

jshell

11,049 posts

206 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
bloomen said:
jshell said:
Am I correct in saying that the $billions in Govt Ukrainian aid donations just disappeared with FTX?
I think it was a pure crypto to fiat arrangement so it was sucked out as soon as it went in. I assume other FTX users paid for it.
Does that mean we know where the Ukrainian donations are?

EddieSteadyGo

12,056 posts

204 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
Fundoreen said:
..

Dummies need to realize the person imploring them to join in is trying to save themselves.
When people think they are onto a good deal they are very quiet and secretive.
Unfortunately that takes time and experience to know. I have a friend who is about 30 years old and he was (slightly) boasting to me about a new "coin" he was 'investing' in paying something like 10% interest on deposits. He had a large portion of his savings (£30k) into it. Honestly I spent a good amount of time trying to get him to question why would a business pay 10% interest, just on deposits? What were they doing with the money? What was the level of (unregulated) risk he was accepting? That coin turned out to be Luna and look what happened there....

I even gave him (recent) examples of failed business, like the p2p lending, where the person lending money was taking on a far higher risk than many realised. Couldn't get through to him - just implied I didn't understand it properly ..except he couldn't explain what facts I had misunderstood...

And I'm not against high risk investments - I have quite a lot of money tied up selling derivatives, and that involves very significant risk, but at least I think there it is possible to define the risks and see the value proposition to both sides of the transaction. Not so much with crypto.

egomeister

6,712 posts

264 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
carinaman said:
David Scott on UK Column News discussing the 99 second video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow-MN7qJnIY and Warren Buffett video.

This Ponsi scheme wearing a Crypto mask isn't good news for Digital Central Bank Currencies?
Regarding CBDCs, I think this gives them extra leverage because it sets up for them to be pushed as safe against the wild west alternatives.

EddieSteadyGo

12,056 posts

204 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
egomeister said:
Regarding CBDCs, I think this gives them extra leverage because it sets up for them to be pushed as safe against the wild west alternatives.
Yep, personally I don't see much overlap between CBDCs and crypto, except one might have been the genesis of the idea for the other.

carinaman

21,335 posts

173 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
EddieSteadyGo said:
egomeister said:
Regarding CBDCs, I think this gives them extra leverage because it sets up for them to be pushed as safe against the wild west alternatives.
Yep, personally I don't see much overlap between CBDCs and crypto, except one might have been the genesis of the idea for the other.
Thanks for the replies. I've a busy week but will think on it.

Third comment under bhute video seems to agree with your points:

'He was the fall guy. They probably did this on purpose so Cryoto can be regulated but in the midst of that they were screwing around trying to launder some money.'

https://www.bhute.com/video/BJnQPmKtJog/

ReverendCounter

6,087 posts

177 months

Monday 14th November 2022
quotequote all
digger_R said:
An exchange doesn't become that big unless doors are opened for it - especially in the USA.
Seems there's a lot of evidence of FTX allowing market makers/hedgefunders to use their tokenized stocks as collateral/locates.