Cost of living squeeze in 2022, 23 & 24 (Vol. 2)

Cost of living squeeze in 2022, 23 & 24 (Vol. 2)

Author
Discussion

towser44

3,505 posts

116 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
119 said:
And yet many supermarkets were seeking bags of veg for approx 15p.
9p in Tesco

towser44

3,505 posts

116 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
okgo said:
RayDonovan said:
'Next' results have been decent but I think they massively benefit from a really slick online offering - not sure any retailer combines online and physical as well as Next do.
Tbh not many of the big highstreet shops are bad these days, they’re all mostly using the same tech (I’ve sold it to them in some cases). JD have been pretty advanced for a while.

Suspect their audience are feeling the hit more than most.
JD Sports are garbage. There are regularly cheap deals posted on Hot UK Deals, but the JD Sports website is useless. I've had several orders cancelled by them days later, because after checkout AND payment they've been out of stock.

119

6,557 posts

37 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
Carl_VivaEspana said:
soupdragon1 said:
??

We were in Belfast 2 weeks before Christmas getting stuff. Some sports clothing for my son in JD Sports and there was a zig zag queue at the till, the kind you see at airport security.

Multi storey car park was 1 in 1 out at 10am. Absolute chaos at times.
We have seen it in this thread many times, 'town seems packed' etc. but then you see this:

"Shares in JD Sports have plummeted by more than 20% after the sportswear seller issued an profit warning.

The company said its profits would be about £125m lower than previously predicted after a worse-than-expected festive trading period."

I think that sometimes, people just want to get out of the home and interact, especially at Christmas.
Is that because tax payers aren't propping them up anymore?

Vanden Saab

14,186 posts

75 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
119 said:
Carl_VivaEspana said:
soupdragon1 said:
??

We were in Belfast 2 weeks before Christmas getting stuff. Some sports clothing for my son in JD Sports and there was a zig zag queue at the till, the kind you see at airport security.

Multi storey car park was 1 in 1 out at 10am. Absolute chaos at times.
We have seen it in this thread many times, 'town seems packed' etc. but then you see this:

"Shares in JD Sports have plummeted by more than 20% after the sportswear seller issued an profit warning.

The company said its profits would be about £125m lower than previously predicted after a worse-than-expected festive trading period."

I think that sometimes, people just want to get out of the home and interact, especially at Christmas.
Is that because tax payers aren't propping them up anymore?
More likely because they do not give refunds only exchanges if goods are bought in store. We avoided shopping with them for this very reason.

spikeyhead

17,392 posts

198 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
RayDonovan said:
Indeed, terrible performance with profits of only £925,000,000 this year

RayDonovan

4,446 posts

216 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
spikeyhead said:
RayDonovan said:
Indeed, terrible performance with profits of only £925,000,000 this year
That's not really how it works when you're listed on the stock market and you have to issue a profit warning after the busiest time of the year.
Obviously £925m is an awful lot of money, but a profit warning and a 20% drop in their share price is a 'rough time'.

Fusion777

2,250 posts

49 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
Didn’t realise JD were that profitable, that’s nuts.

Hustle_

24,772 posts

161 months

Thursday 4th January
quotequote all
The merchandise must be dirt cheap!

spikeyhead

17,392 posts

198 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
RayDonovan said:
spikeyhead said:
RayDonovan said:
Indeed, terrible performance with profits of only £925,000,000 this year
That's not really how it works when you're listed on the stock market and you have to issue a profit warning after the busiest time of the year.
Obviously £925m is an awful lot of money, but a profit warning and a 20% drop in their share price is a 'rough time'.
I'm quite aware of the fickleness of stock markets

Digga

40,411 posts

284 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
spikeyhead said:
RayDonovan said:
spikeyhead said:
RayDonovan said:
Indeed, terrible performance with profits of only £925,000,000 this year
That's not really how it works when you're listed on the stock market and you have to issue a profit warning after the busiest time of the year.
Obviously £925m is an awful lot of money, but a profit warning and a 20% drop in their share price is a 'rough time'.
I'm quite aware of the fickleness of stock markets
It's also indicative of how challenging the previous 3 years - pandemic, money printing, then rampant inflation - have been, even to large, well capitalised businesses.

Even Next, who've done well, are saying the biggest single hit for 2024 is going to be wage rises.

We are still in very difficult territory.

towser44

3,505 posts

116 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
I assume the £925,000,000 isn't JD Sports alone and is the wider JD Sports Group, which also includes Go Outdoors, Millets, Blacks, Get the Label amongst others?

okgo

38,233 posts

199 months

Friday 5th January
quotequote all
Would have thought so. Though can’t imagine any of those are particularly successful compared.

JagLover

42,521 posts

236 months

Wednesday 17th January
quotequote all
Bad news on inflation -up 0.4% MOM after a fall in November.
Yearly inflation at 4%.

Interest rates likely to stay at current levels for longer.

Digga

40,411 posts

284 months

Wednesday 17th January
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Bad news on inflation -up 0.4% MOM after a fall in November.
Yearly inflation at 4%.

Interest rates likely to stay at current levels for longer.
It's an interesting conundrum though, because news on employment, especially press releases from recruiters and, in particualr, in London, point to a very depressed job market.

The way the BoE works, on data 3 months old, it will nearly always be wrong. It's like the economy is being driven - by the businesses and government bodies - with those at the wheel not in charge of either the throttle or bake pedals. The BoE is sat in the back, looking out of the rear window, having thoughts like "we've been on a stright for half a mile, we could have used more throttle or, oh crap, that was a sleeping policeman we failed to brake for".

gotoPzero

17,343 posts

190 months

Wednesday 17th January
quotequote all
Back from Thailand yesterday popped into aldi and I noticed 10-15p increase on some items since November.


Chris Type R

8,062 posts

250 months

Wednesday 17th January
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Bad news on inflation -up 0.4% MOM after a fall in November.
Yearly inflation at 4%.

Interest rates likely to stay at current levels for longer.
It's an odd one - if the reporting is to believed and the rise is attributable to tobacco & alcohol.

For most, these are discretionary spends - prices go up and you simply consume less of the item. Also, I might be living in a bubble - but I think I only know one person who smokes anymore. I would have thought that the contribution of tobacco to the inflation calculation would be quite small if my experience is representative of the country as a whole.

I think the demand side is more able to react to these price increases than say rises attributable to rising fuel / energy costs - or food costs (influence by rises elsewhere).

isaldiri

18,710 posts

169 months

Wednesday 17th January
quotequote all
Digga said:
It's an interesting conundrum though, because news on employment, especially press releases from recruiters and, in particualr, in London, point to a very depressed job market.

The way the BoE works, on data 3 months old, it will nearly always be wrong. It's like the economy is being driven - by the businesses and government bodies - with those at the wheel not in charge of either the throttle or bake pedals. The BoE is sat in the back, looking out of the rear window, having thoughts like "we've been on a stright for half a mile, we could have used more throttle or, oh crap, that was a sleeping policeman we failed to brake for".
It's probably unlikely that a single point in december is going to meaningfully change anything planned by the BoE. Especially given the Oct and Nov monthly inflation numbers had come in lower than expected so there is some leeway. If a year ago someone had offered 4% YoY inflation to the BoE and HM treasury i suspect they would have been more than happy to take that.

This latest inflation print probably only really changes more in the market pricing of rate and timing of cuts to the base rate because there is quite a wide gap between central banker speak and market perception..... The recent shipping related issues however does put a slight spanner in the works even if it rather obviously shouldn't. Prices might well get pushed higher as a result especially if there is a more major incident than what has already happened but fat lot of good base rates are going to do about that when arguably the 'neutral rate' required by the slowing economy should probably be looking someone well below where we are now even now.....

Tonberry

2,089 posts

193 months

Wednesday 17th January
quotequote all
In the desperation for inflation and in turn interest rates to fall, people are overlooking Core inflation and Services inflation, both far more important than CPI as a reflection of the economy. Neither metric shows any sign of falling in the short term - and why would they - given all of these pay rises have to be paid for, not to mention the increase in minimum wage coming up.

Unemployment is at an all time low and people are earning vastly more and possess more wealth than they ever have.

Why the hurry to return to the ponzi level token interest rates that are responsible for inflation and the asset bubble we've seen over the last decade?

Rufus Stone

6,403 posts

57 months

Wednesday 17th January
quotequote all
Heard a snippet on the news this morning, insurance premiums have on average increased by 50% year on year. Most of us knew this already I guess.

Digga

40,411 posts

284 months

Wednesday 17th January
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
Digga said:
It's an interesting conundrum though, because news on employment, especially press releases from recruiters and, in particualr, in London, point to a very depressed job market.

The way the BoE works, on data 3 months old, it will nearly always be wrong. It's like the economy is being driven - by the businesses and government bodies - with those at the wheel not in charge of either the throttle or bake pedals. The BoE is sat in the back, looking out of the rear window, having thoughts like "we've been on a stright for half a mile, we could have used more throttle or, oh crap, that was a sleeping policeman we failed to brake for".
It's probably unlikely that a single point in december is going to meaningfully change anything planned by the BoE. Especially given the Oct and Nov monthly inflation numbers had come in lower than expected so there is some leeway. If a year ago someone had offered 4% YoY inflation to the BoE and HM treasury i suspect they would have been more than happy to take that.

This latest inflation print probably only really changes more in the market pricing of rate and timing of cuts to the base rate because there is quite a wide gap between central banker speak and market perception..... The recent shipping related issues however does put a slight spanner in the works even if it rather obviously shouldn't. Prices might well get pushed higher as a result especially if there is a more major incident than what has already happened but fat lot of good base rates are going to do about that when arguably the 'neutral rate' required by the slowing economy should probably be looking someone well below where we are now even now.....
In the real world, not BoE la la land, it's carnage.

Economist Noble Francis said:
4,370 construction firms went out of business in the UK in the year to November 2023, which is 7.0% higher than a year ago & 37.9% higher than in the year to January 2020, pre-pandemic, according to the latest Government Insolvency Service data.
https://twitter.com/NobleFrancis/status/1747194852675076131

Which by extension also means, forget the government hitting the cross-party agreed target of 300k new homes last year, this year, or next...