Thames Water- Finished?

Author
Discussion

glazbagun

Original Poster:

14,280 posts

197 months

Tuesday 12th December 2023
quotequote all
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67696645

Good old private sector, eh? From what I remember those responsible for the debts got out while the going was good, but I can't see any reason not to let them go to the wall.

ReallyReallyGood

1,622 posts

130 months

Tuesday 12th December 2023
quotequote all
They’re going down the toilet.

hidetheelephants

24,357 posts

193 months

Tuesday 12th December 2023
quotequote all
Oh dear; how sad, never mind. Once it crashes it can be nationalised. Without the insane leveraging it might actually function.

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

247 months

Tuesday 12th December 2023
quotequote all
Wow another massive hole for the government to piss tax payers money into.


What a mess.

eharding

13,711 posts

284 months

Tuesday 12th December 2023
quotequote all
As far as I can tell, the largest Thames Water shareholders are the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System, China's sovereign wealth fund, the Universities Superannuation Scheme, and Abu Dhabi's Infinity.

If it was allowed to fail, Bing's AI rendering of the outcome looks like this. HTH.




hidetheelephants

24,357 posts

193 months

Tuesday 12th December 2023
quotequote all
eharding said:
As far as I can tell, the largest Thames Water shareholders are the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System, China's sovereign wealth fund, the Universities Superannuation Scheme, and Abu Dhabi's Infinity.

If it was allowed to fail, Bing's AI rendering of the outcome looks like this. HTH.

The value of investments may go down as well as up. HTH. It's not my problem they've been irresponsible shareholders.

CoolHands

18,641 posts

195 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
CHINA!

so how much money was allowed out the company in dividends over the years? - Just looked it up, £7.2 billion

And here’s a nice graphic of the spiralling debt


hidetheelephants

24,357 posts

193 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Pretty good going given the assets are maybe worth a tenth of that.

abzmike

8,383 posts

106 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Would this happen to be another formerly publicly owned company that is regulated poorly? There really does seem to be a pattern here…

Diderot

7,320 posts

192 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Meanwhile we have to put up with their st.

otherman

2,191 posts

165 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Pretty good going given the assets are maybe worth a tenth of that.
Good luck building sewers and water mains at £6 per m.

smifffymoto

4,554 posts

205 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
All infrastructure has been sold off for short term profit previous Governments.

Only now is it coming back to slap the tax payer in the face.
Most people with any common sense could see this scenario from a mile away.

Biker 1

7,734 posts

119 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
smifffymoto said:
All infrastructure has been sold off for short term profit previous Governments.

Only now is it coming back to slap the tax payer in the face.
Most people with any common sense could see this scenario from a mile away.
I remember Thatcher's great sell off....
Are any of the previously nationalised companies giving Joe Public decent service??

borcy

2,873 posts

56 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
What's the going rate for nationalisation if it comes to that?

vaud

50,509 posts

155 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Biker 1 said:
I remember Thatcher's great sell off....
Are any of the previously nationalised companies giving Joe Public decent service??
BT is way better than before. There used to be (long) waiting lists to have a phone installed.

heisthegaffer

3,404 posts

198 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
vaud said:
Biker 1 said:
I remember Thatcher's great sell off....
Are any of the previously nationalised companies giving Joe Public decent service??
BT is way better than before. There used to be (long) waiting lists to have a phone installed.


I don't know enough about this so not trying to be contrary but surely some of this is due to tech implementation?

Or perhaps a bit of both?

Murph7355

37,716 posts

256 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
heisthegaffer said:
vaud said:
Biker 1 said:
I remember Thatcher's great sell off....
Are any of the previously nationalised companies giving Joe Public decent service??
BT is way better than before. There used to be (long) waiting lists to have a phone installed.


I don't know enough about this so not trying to be contrary but surely some of this is due to tech implementation?

Or perhaps a bit of both?
Likely both. But there are still throwbacks to the 70s in the industry who you can see are still clinging on to their old ways. I'd put it down to organisation and genuine competition coming into the market (increasingly so now).


Biker 1 said:
I remember Thatcher's great sell off....
Are any of the previously nationalised companies giving Joe Public decent service??
Were they before privatisation? Did privatisation happen because they were a crock of st money pit?

Water should never have been privatised. There's no ability for genuine competition, and it's a critical resource.

The same could possibly be argued for energy in this country.

But I think we've seen over the decades that changing govt bodies to run better from inside is seemingly impossible. So maybe the privatisation shake up was needed.

Renationalise by taking over the busted flushes. No money to current owners etc.

Meanwhile, much better regulation is required to stop companies paying out billions in dividends when they are racking up more billions in debt.

robbieduncan

1,981 posts

236 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
heisthegaffer said:


I don't know enough about this so not trying to be contrary but surely some of this is due to tech implementation?

Or perhaps a bit of both?
Or a complete change in demand profile. We don’t have a landline. Haven’t for years. Don’t want one

S600BSB

4,631 posts

106 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
Sadly yet another example of Tory failure.

sugerbear

4,035 posts

158 months

Wednesday 13th December 2023
quotequote all
heisthegaffer said:


I don't know enough about this so not trying to be contrary but surely some of this is due to tech implementation?

Or perhaps a bit of both?
BT had a monopoly. Technology and competition

I still think openreach should be nationalised as that is infrastructure and they have no competition. Its just taken 12 days to have a phone installed at a property someone i know has moved into.