Law - Free Speech - Conundrum - Quandary
Discussion
monthou said:
She hasn't been attacked.
Her employer has seemingly decided - or is possibly in the process of deciding - that her exercising her freedom of speech as she has is incompatible with her employment.
Should she be able to say whatever she wants without consequence?
You don't consider sacking to be an attack? I don't mean physically.Her employer has seemingly decided - or is possibly in the process of deciding - that her exercising her freedom of speech as she has is incompatible with her employment.
Should she be able to say whatever she wants without consequence?
She got what she might have reasonably expected- I just don't consider it compatible with the concept of genuine free speech.
Biggy Stardust said:
monthou said:
She hasn't been attacked.
Her employer has seemingly decided - or is possibly in the process of deciding - that her exercising her freedom of speech as she has is incompatible with her employment.
Should she be able to say whatever she wants without consequence?
You don't consider sacking to be an attack? I don't mean physically.Her employer has seemingly decided - or is possibly in the process of deciding - that her exercising her freedom of speech as she has is incompatible with her employment.
Should she be able to say whatever she wants without consequence?
She got what she might have reasonably expected- I just don't consider it compatible with the concept of genuine free speech.
Which means your rights trump their rights to respond.
Doesn't sound fair.
Biggy Stardust said:
Seasonal Hero said:
Should I be able to call a black man a ‘n*****’’?
If black guys are allowed then you should be allowed, if not then not. Otherwise that's racial discrimination. All are allowed or all are forbidden- a decision should be made & all abide by it.Would you agree?
Biggy Stardust said:
If black guys are allowed then you should be allowed, if not then not. Otherwise that's racial discrimination. All are allowed or all are forbidden- a decision should be made & all abide by it.
Would you agree?
No. Because it’s a racial slur that has been taken back by the black community to remove its power in that sense. It’s also a slur that can’t be made by someone with the same skin colour in the racial sense. Would you agree?
To suggest that a white man not being allowed to use it being racial discrimination is off the scale mental.
I’m starting to think you haven’t thought this through.
Biggy Stardust said:
Seasonal Hero said:
Should I be able to call a black man a ‘n*****’’?
If black guys are allowed then you should be allowed, if not then not. Otherwise that's racial discrimination. All are allowed or all are forbidden- a decision should be made & all abide by it.Would you agree?
These days you can't even say you're English without getting locked up and thrown in jail.
Seasonal Hero said:
No. Because it’s a racial slur that has been taken back by the black community to remove its power in that sense. It’s also a slur that can’t be made by someone with the same skin colour in the racial sense.
To suggest that a white man not being allowed to use it being racial discrimination is off the scale mental.
I’m starting to think you haven’t thought this through.
All should be treated the same- anything else is discrimination. Think it through.To suggest that a white man not being allowed to use it being racial discrimination is off the scale mental.
I’m starting to think you haven’t thought this through.
smn159 said:
Spot on! Those so-called rappers use the N-word all the time without consequence. I shout it once at my son's football match and get asked to leave.
These days you can't even say you're English without getting locked up and thrown in jail.
These days you can't even say you're English without getting locked up and thrown in jail.
Speaking of which I’m off to see Mr Lee tomorrow.
monthou said:
That comes back to free speech = say what you like to anyone with no consequences.
Which means your rights trump their rights to respond.
Doesn't sound fair.
Free speech does equal say what you want without consequence.Which means your rights trump their rights to respond.
Doesn't sound fair.
It doesn't actually exist but that's what it means, even for for stuff you don't like.
Biggy Stardust said:
Seasonal Hero said:
No. Because it’s a racial slur that has been taken back by the black community to remove its power in that sense. It’s also a slur that can’t be made by someone with the same skin colour in the racial sense.
To suggest that a white man not being allowed to use it being racial discrimination is off the scale mental.
I’m starting to think you haven’t thought this through.
All should be treated the same- anything else is discrimination. Think it through.To suggest that a white man not being allowed to use it being racial discrimination is off the scale mental.
I’m starting to think you haven’t thought this through.
Seasonal Hero said:
Biggy Stardust said:
All should be treated the same- anything else is discrimination. Think it through.
Mr Binary is in town clearly. If you can’t understand the difference then I can explain it for you but I can’t understand it for you.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff