Hacker to be extradited

[cs02rm0]

Rusty Arches said:

Thank god for the Tories

Long live this reign of common sense.

[Jimbeaux]

Rusty Arches said:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7743874/Com...

Thank god for the Tories

Personally, I wish the hacker was malicious. Shame it was someone that didn't do some real damage.

I believe he should stay at home as well; I hope he is granted a stay.
Rusty Arches, why exactly do you wish he was malicious? Why do you wish he would have done real damage??

[tinman0]

Jimbeaux said:

Rusty Arches said:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7743874/Com...

Thank god for the Tories

Personally, I wish the hacker was malicious. Shame it was someone that didn't do some real damage.

I believe he should stay at home as well; I hope he is granted a stay.
Rusty Arches, why exactly do you wish he was malicious? Why do you wish he would have done real damage??

I think he should be sent over, if only to get a real punishment. If he is prosecuted here, he won't see any jail time in the slightest.

I have zero sympathy for hackers, and frankly they could do with chopping their masturbating hand off as punishment.

[Jimbeaux]

tinman0 said:

Jimbeaux said:

Rusty Arches said:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7743874/Com...

Thank god for the Tories

Personally, I wish the hacker was malicious. Shame it was someone that didn't do some real damage.

I believe he should stay at home as well; I hope he is granted a stay.
Rusty Arches, why exactly do you wish he was malicious? Why do you wish he would have done real damage??

I think he should be sent over, if only to get a real punishment. If he is prosecuted here, he won't see any jail time in the slightest.

I have zero sympathy for hackers, and frankly they could do with chopping their masturbating hand off as punishment.

[rypt]

Jimbeaux said:

Rusty Arches, why exactly do you wish he was malicious? Why do you wish he would have done real damage??

To teach you lot a lesson about having unsecured networks

[Mr_annie_vxr]

rypt said:

Jimbeaux said:

Rusty Arches, why exactly do you wish he was malicious? Why do you wish he would have done real damage??

To teach you lot a lesson about having unsecured networks

So you support burglars rights to burgle. After all it teaches people to secure their houses.

People who act in a criminal manner are not victims.

If your stupid enough to hack secret agencies etc then you put yourself on offer.

Many other ways existed to show these weaknesses.

[rypt]

Mr_annie_vxr said:

rypt said:

Jimbeaux said:

Rusty Arches, why exactly do you wish he was malicious? Why do you wish he would have done real damage??

To teach you lot a lesson about having unsecured networks

So you support burglars rights to burgle. After all it teaches people to secure their houses.

People who act in a criminal manner are not victims.

If your stupid enough to hack secret agencies etc then you put yourself on offer.

Many other ways existed to show these weaknesses.

I was replying in jest

[Jimbeaux]

rypt said:

Jimbeaux said:

Rusty Arches, why exactly do you wish he was malicious? Why do you wish he would have done real damage??

To teach you lot a lesson about having unsecured networks

I think that was learned, don't you? If we are genuinely harmed, like it or not, you "lot" are linked with us. ETA: I see you replied in jest. Sorry; I am dealing with this eternal oil spill, water outages, hurricane season upcoming, etc. My "happy energy" is being taxed!

Edited by Jimbeaux on Thursday 20th May 21:27

[spikeyhead]

Mr_annie_vxr said:

rypt said:

Jimbeaux said:

Rusty Arches, why exactly do you wish he was malicious? Why do you wish he would have done real damage??

To teach you lot a lesson about having unsecured networks

So you support burglars rights to burgle. After all it teaches people to secure their houses.

People who act in a criminal manner are not victims.

If your stupid enough to hack secret agencies etc then you put yourself on offer.

Many other ways existed to show these weaknesses.

However if someone drops a note through the open window of a house, leaving it next to the 52" plasma TV, suggesting that they should take more care, should they be prosecuted for burglary?

[birdcage]

The Yanks are total lunatics, nobody does stupidity and disproportionate behaviour like them.

I would take great delight in telling them to stick this one any other of their silly bks

[anonymous-user]

spikeyhead said:

Mr_annie_vxr said:

rypt said:

Jimbeaux said:

Rusty Arches, why exactly do you wish he was malicious? Why do you wish he would have done real damage??

To teach you lot a lesson about having unsecured networks

So you support burglars rights to burgle. After all it teaches people to secure their houses.

People who act in a criminal manner are not victims.

If your stupid enough to hack secret agencies etc then you put yourself on offer.

Many other ways existed to show these weaknesses.

However if someone drops a note through the open window of a house, leaving it next to the 52" plasma TV, suggesting that they should take more care, should they be prosecuted for burglary?

Yes they should be prosecuted - I hope this lot get time too - http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/29/police-bu...

[Rusty Arches]

Jimbeaux said:

Rusty Arches said:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7743874/Com...

Thank god for the Tories

Personally, I wish the hacker was malicious. Shame it was someone that didn't do some real damage.

I believe he should stay at home as well; I hope he is granted a stay.
Rusty Arches, why exactly do you wish he was malicious? Why do you wish he would have done real damage??

What I meant was I wish it wasn't him who did it (which is very lucky for them) but some Chinese spy or something, based on how he's being treated.

Edited by Rusty Arches on Thursday 20th May 22:27

[Silent1]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

So if i rape a bloke it's ok?
Genius bit of law there, unless i'm reading too much into what you said.

[grumbledoak]

Well, if it happens, a trial here and a slap on the wrists sounds much more just than a show trial by an embarrassed bunch of US government agencies. No doubt the Chinese were all over those servers at the same time, but just didn't leave them messages.

Doesn't excuse the one-sided extradition treaty though.

[Silent1]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Damn, i'll have to remain straight then.

[tinman0]

spikeyhead said:

However if someone drops a note through the open window of a house, leaving it next to the 52" plasma TV, suggesting that they should take more care, should they be prosecuted for burglary?

But he didn't do that. After gaining access to a machine he root kitted the machine, eg altered so he could entry easily next time round regardless.

So, in your analogy, imagine a burglar entered your house, and left a note on the table suggesting you should take more care, but also changed the lock on the doors, bricked up the windows, and had stolen the deeds for the property. (essentially he now controls the computer).

[Silent1]

tinman0 said:

spikeyhead said:

However if someone drops a note through the open window of a house, leaving it next to the 52" plasma TV, suggesting that they should take more care, should they be prosecuted for burglary?

But he didn't do that. After gaining access to a machine he root kitted the machine, eg altered so he could entry easily next time round regardless.

So, in your analogy, imagine a burglar entered your house, and left a note on the table suggesting you should take more care, but also changed the lock on the doors, bricked up the windows, and had stolen the deeds for the property. (essentially he now controls the computer).

but in the process he painted the bricks to look like windows, made sure your keys still worked and left you a replica copy of the deeds.

If you're going to use analogies then follow through with them

[tinman0]

Silent1 said:

tinman0 said:

spikeyhead said:

However if someone drops a note through the open window of a house, leaving it next to the 52" plasma TV, suggesting that they should take more care, should they be prosecuted for burglary?

But he didn't do that. After gaining access to a machine he root kitted the machine, eg altered so he could entry easily next time round regardless.

So, in your analogy, imagine a burglar entered your house, and left a note on the table suggesting you should take more care, but also changed the lock on the doors, bricked up the windows, and had stolen the deeds for the property. (essentially he now controls the computer).

but in the process he painted the bricks to look like windows, made sure your keys still worked and left you a replica copy of the deeds.

If you're going to use analogies then follow through with them

lol, thankyou.

[Silent1]

tinman0 said:

Silent1 said:

tinman0 said:

spikeyhead said:

However if someone drops a note through the open window of a house, leaving it next to the 52" plasma TV, suggesting that they should take more care, should they be prosecuted for burglary?

But he didn't do that. After gaining access to a machine he root kitted the machine, eg altered so he could entry easily next time round regardless.

So, in your analogy, imagine a burglar entered your house, and left a note on the table suggesting you should take more care, but also changed the lock on the doors, bricked up the windows, and had stolen the deeds for the property. (essentially he now controls the computer).

but in the process he painted the bricks to look like windows, made sure your keys still worked and left you a replica copy of the deeds.

If you're going to use analogies then follow through with them

lol, thankyou.

no problem, having developed many a rootkit, i wouldn't want people to think i was sloppy.

[tinman0]

Silent1 said:

no problem, having developed many a rootkit, i wouldn't want people to think i was sloppy.

Having advised Surrey Police on how to catch you guys, I applaud your thoroughness