Climate Cat out of the Bag? Potentially dynamite revelations
Discussion
Guam said:
Just as a Humourous aside How many gavins are their in climate Science related subjects in the UK, I keep stumbling accross that name everywhere on the PRo AGW camp, even Our Ludo is apparrently called Gavin
Do you need to be called Gavin to be A Climate Scientist now then
Just before anyone piles in, its a Joke People
I seem to remember there is a Gavin index plot somewhere, which shows a high correllation between the number of people called Gavin and global temperatures! Mea maxima culpa, it's all my fault (well me and the other Gavins anyway). Do you need to be called Gavin to be A Climate Scientist now then
Just before anyone piles in, its a Joke People
Anyone else find it strange that reasonably intelligent people would chose to painstakingly document any wrong doing? 1000+ times? I'm hardly the brain of Britain but even I know better than that.
I guess the phrase "innocent until proven guilty", holds true here although I do think under the circumstances they should grant access to their emails/files by an independant third party to confirm whether the leak was genuine or not.
Like everything else about this climate change business I remain sceptical.
I guess the phrase "innocent until proven guilty", holds true here although I do think under the circumstances they should grant access to their emails/files by an independant third party to confirm whether the leak was genuine or not.
Like everything else about this climate change business I remain sceptical.
ludo said:
FunkyGibbon said:
ludo said:
The implications of the emails is that the scientists are deliberately fraudulent in the performing the science, which as I have said isn't a game that is likely to pay off for them if they know what they are saying to be untrue.
That's what I meant re: pay masters and flexibility. A lot of people have a lot of money tied up in this, so quite easy to believe that some decisions could be driven by financial agendas rather than science.Xenocide said:
Can someone please get the links TB posted to the Telegraph? It must make the public domain on a bigger scale by the end of the day surely.I'm posting in here to keep track of what's going on - but I wonder how this will shake out.
In fact, I'll put money down that there will be strong debunking on this with lots of contradicting "correct" evidence being presented and this being marked as the work of "oil hungry, gas guzzling climate killers".
In fact, I'll put money down that there will be strong debunking on this with lots of contradicting "correct" evidence being presented and this being marked as the work of "oil hungry, gas guzzling climate killers".
AshVX220 said:
Xenocide said:
Can someone please get the links TB posted to the Telegraph? It must make the public domain on a bigger scale by the end of the day surely.B Oeuf said:
AshVX220 said:
Xenocide said:
Can someone please get the links TB posted to the Telegraph? It must make the public domain on a bigger scale by the end of the day surely.turbobloke said:
B Oeuf said:
AshVX220 said:
Xenocide said:
Can someone please get the links TB posted to the Telegraph? It must make the public domain on a bigger scale by the end of the day surely.B Oeuf said:
AshVX220 said:
Xenocide said:
Can someone please get the links TB posted to the Telegraph? It must make the public domain on a bigger scale by the end of the day surely.I've sent The Register a link to the WUWT article as they sometimes take the piss out of the Global Warming community. Whether they publish it or not I don't know.
This looks like genuine data to me. The emails could be a hoax but the data provided in the documents directory is consistent. There is data that appears to be for a couple of GIS systems one of which I have confirmed is valid (it loads into the software). There also appears to be Terramodel data which is a geographical modelling and survey system. I don't recognize some of the other data formats but I reckon it will all found to be genuine.
The properties from the MS Word and Excel documents have a range of authors and sources with diffrent software versions. If it is a hoax someone has put an enormous amount of effort into it.
The properties from the MS Word and Excel documents have a range of authors and sources with diffrent software versions. If it is a hoax someone has put an enormous amount of effort into it.
Guam said:
ludo said:
Guam said:
Just as a Humourous aside How many gavins are their in climate Science related subjects in the UK, I keep stumbling accross that name everywhere on the PRo AGW camp, even Our Ludo is apparrently called Gavin
Do you need to be called Gavin to be A Climate Scientist now then
Just before anyone piles in, its a Joke People
I seem to remember there is a Gavin index plot somewhere, which shows a high correllation between the number of people called Gavin and global temperatures! Mea maxima culpa, it's all my fault (well me and the other Gavins anyway). Do you need to be called Gavin to be A Climate Scientist now then
Just before anyone piles in, its a Joke People
I reckon there may be a Statistical rule on it somewhere Ludo
Dangerous things thems Ipods.
IL_JDM said:
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Hadley unit: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/...
I'll sit on my hands for a while now and see how it develops.
From what I understand, thats a mistake by the author of the article and nothing to do with the actual link?someonefromawebsite said:
British Barry says:
This is an obvious hoax.
Sorry, but there is no Hadley Climatic Research Centre at the University of East Anglia.
The University of East Anglia has a Climatic Research Unit, which is based at the University, which is in Norwich, Norfolk.
True
Meanwhile, the British Government's Met Office has a Hadley Centre which looks at climate change. This is not part of the University of East Anglia, and is based several hundred miles away in Exeter, Devon.
Also true
Given this fundamental factual error in the article, should we trust any of it?
November 20, 5:49 AM
Climatic Research Unit: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/This is an obvious hoax.
Sorry, but there is no Hadley Climatic Research Centre at the University of East Anglia.
The University of East Anglia has a Climatic Research Unit, which is based at the University, which is in Norwich, Norfolk.
True
Meanwhile, the British Government's Met Office has a Hadley Centre which looks at climate change. This is not part of the University of East Anglia, and is based several hundred miles away in Exeter, Devon.
Also true
Given this fundamental factual error in the article, should we trust any of it?
November 20, 5:49 AM
Hadley unit: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/...
I'll sit on my hands for a while now and see how it develops.
Edited by IL_JDM on Friday 20th November 11:30
AshVX220 said:
So, has anyone sent them the links, or shall I? Or should we all do it? For a start it won't be properly investigated until it's in the mainstream.
The more people that shout about, the more likely it is to be reported on, surely?Edited by IL_JDM on Friday 20th November 11:32
IL_JDM said:
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Hadley unit: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/...
I'll sit on my hands for a while now and see how it develops.
someonefromawebsite said:
British Barry says:
This is an obvious hoax.
Sorry, but there is no Hadley Climatic Research Centre at the University of East Anglia.
The University of East Anglia has a Climatic Research Unit, which is based at the University, which is in Norwich, Norfolk.
True
Meanwhile, the British Government's Met Office has a Hadley Centre which looks at climate change. This is not part of the University of East Anglia, and is based several hundred miles away in Exeter, Devon.
Also true
Given this fundamental factual error in the article, should we trust any of it?
November 20, 5:49 AM
Climatic Research Unit: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/This is an obvious hoax.
Sorry, but there is no Hadley Climatic Research Centre at the University of East Anglia.
The University of East Anglia has a Climatic Research Unit, which is based at the University, which is in Norwich, Norfolk.
True
Meanwhile, the British Government's Met Office has a Hadley Centre which looks at climate change. This is not part of the University of East Anglia, and is based several hundred miles away in Exeter, Devon.
Also true
Given this fundamental factual error in the article, should we trust any of it?
November 20, 5:49 AM
Hadley unit: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/...
I'll sit on my hands for a while now and see how it develops.
Some time around 9am today on this thread I said:
Also worth noting that much web coverage is referring to this as 'Hadley' but Hadley is UKMO, this is UEA CRU.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff