Climate Cat out of the Bag? Potentially dynamite revelations

Climate Cat out of the Bag? Potentially dynamite revelations

Author
Discussion

Ali G

3,526 posts

282 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
So here's a question..

Are you vetted before you take a degree in climatology?

Quite fancy taking some time off and getting stuck in! Although I may not be 'on message'

turbobloke

Original Poster:

103,863 posts

260 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
deeps said:
turbobloke said:
It's been like this for a very long time. I have images on file stretching way back.

What does it look like when it doesn't look like that?

grumbledoak

31,532 posts

233 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
It's been like this for a very long time. I have images on file stretching way back.

That is a very bored Sun.

The Excession

11,669 posts

250 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
odyssey2200 said:
it has black spots on it!
class! rofl

turbobloke

Original Poster:

103,863 posts

260 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
Ali G said:
So here's a question..

Are you vetted before you take a degree in climatology?

Quite fancy taking some time off and getting stuck in! Although I may not be 'on message'
There's one item on the interviewer's clipboard these days:

Q: Do you want to save the pwanet?

A:

B Oeuf

39,731 posts

284 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
FunkyGibbon said:
Apologies if this been posted before - I don't remember seeing it, and I tried to search as well:

CRU Update

Statement from Professor Trevor Davies Pro-Vice-Chancellor Research said:
...
We have, therefore, decided to conduct an independent review, which will address the issue of data security, an assessment of how we responded to a deluge of Freedom of Information requests, and any other relevant issues which the independent reviewer advises should be addressed.
Wonder how far reaching the relevant issues will be?



Edited by FunkyGibbon on Thursday 26th November 19:54
"There is nothing in the stolen material which indicates that peer-reviewed publications by CRU, and others, on the nature of global warming and related climate change are not of the highest-quality of scientific investigation and interpretation"

Jesus, listen to him. Just stop, stop it now, these fking pathetic attempts to deny this mess are embarassing, oh, and for the record nothing was stolen, you backed up your data on an external server you lying, inept, immoral, spineless ahole. Save it for the inquiry bozo

turbobloke

Original Poster:

103,863 posts

260 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
The Excession said:
odyssey2200 said:
it has black spots on it!
class! rofl
biggrin

The images shown are H-alpha which reveal active areas including spots but the spot areas don't look the same as they would in visible light.

For H-alpha images to look the way they do, for so long is...unprecedented....a tipping point...a sign that taxes are too low...really taking us back to the Dalton Minimum if not the Maunder Minimum (latter of Little Ice Age fame). There are no indicators at this stage inconsistent with either, to see how deep and prolonged this long-predicted Gleissberg deep minimum is we must continue observing and look to the data.

turbobloke

Original Poster:

103,863 posts

260 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
B Oeuf said:
FunkyGibbon said:
Apologies if this been posted before - I don't remember seeing it, and I tried to search as well:

CRU Update

Statement from Professor Trevor Davies Pro-Vice-Chancellor Research said:
...
We have, therefore, decided to conduct an independent review, which will address the issue of data security, an assessment of how we responded to a deluge of Freedom of Information requests, and any other relevant issues which the independent reviewer advises should be addressed.
Wonder how far reaching the relevant issues will be?



Edited by FunkyGibbon on Thursday 26th November 19:54
"There is nothing in the stolen material which indicates that peer-reviewed publications by CRU, and others, on the nature of global warming and related climate change are not of the highest-quality of scientific investigation and interpretation"

Jesus, listen to him. Just stop, stop it now, these fking pathetic attempts to deny this mess are embarassing, oh, and for the record nothing was stolen, you backed up your data on an external server you lying, inept, immoral, spineless ahole. Save it for the inquiry bozo
rolleyes

As expected.

Remedy:

recognising trickery and slippery excuses

turbobloke

Original Poster:

103,863 posts

260 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
Any VC has to keep an eye on funding, linked to world class research quality and citation of work by peers.

MotleyCRU's uni was 28= in 2008, every little helps.

deeps

5,392 posts

241 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
The images shown are H-alpha which reveal active areas including spots but the spot areas don't look the same as they would in visible light.

For H-alpha images to look the way they do, for so long is...unprecedented....a tipping point...a sign that taxes are too low...really taking us back to the Dalton Minimum if not the Maunder Minimum (latter of Little Ice Age fame). There are no indicators at this stage inconsistent with either, to see how deep and prolonged this long-predicted Gleissberg deep minimum is we must continue observing and look to the data.
Thanks for 2nd photo. So how long does a new spot normally take to appear, and how long does it last for once it's there?

How can periods such as the current minimum have been predicted, and presumably using that theory how long will it last do you think?

Tangent Police

3,097 posts

176 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
I would be interested in hearing about threads similar to this which are based in other countries. Particularly the US, if you can find any, link away.


69 coupe

2,433 posts

211 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
James Delingpole (Telegraph blog), live on LBC Radio now 93.7 and live discussion.
http://mediaweb.musicradio.com/player/default.asp?...

Edit to add he wasn't on for long.
His last quote "Spanking a fortune on this non existent problem" biggrin

Edited by 69 coupe on Thursday 26th November 20:51

deeps

5,392 posts

241 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
Smith & Jones haha.

BBC1's The One Show at 7pm had Delia Smith as a guest. They were disussing the Cumbrian floods, and Delia said she's taking it all very seriously now, wearing extra clothes and turning the heating down.

There's nothing worse than watching gullible celebs preaching Man Made-up Global Warming.

grumbledoak

31,532 posts

233 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
deeps said:
There's nothing worse than watching gullible celebs preaching Man Made-up Global Warming.
You've forgotten that Phil Collins "Nonce Sence" interview...

HarryW

15,150 posts

269 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
Q time tonight has Melanie Phillips on, even if the direct question is not selected by the BBC stazi editorial team I'm hopeful she'll raise the subject at some point.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

255 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
deeps said:
There's nothing worse than watching gullible celebs preaching Man Made-up Global Warming.
You've forgotten that Phil Collins "Nonce Sence" interview...
Not forgetting Dumbo Dickie's seven figure prize for working out how to capture CO2...




chris watton

22,477 posts

260 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
"Climategate: this is our Berlin Wall moment!"

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/...

"I’ve just had a great, very sympathetic interview about Climategate on LBC radio (London’s main commercial news and talk station) with Petrie Hosken. She told me she has been simply inundated with callers, all of them utterly unconvinced that human influence has made any significant on so-called “Global Warming”. She was desperate to get a few balancing calls from people who do believe in AGW but just couldn’t find any.

Can you imagine this happening a year ago? Or even a month ago? Until Climategate, we “Sceptics” were considered freaks – almost as bad as Holocaust deniers – beyond the pale of reasonable balanced discussion. Suddenly we’re the norm. Climategate has finally given us the chance to express openly what many of us secretly felt all along:

AGW is about raising taxes; increasing state control; about a few canny hucksters who’ve leapt on the bandwagon fleecing us rotten with their taxpayer subsidised windfarms and their carbon-trading; about the sour, anti-capitalist impulses of sandal-wearing vegans and lapsed Communists who loathe the idea of freedom and a functioning market economy.

We know it’s all a crock and we’re not going to take it.

This is our Berlin Wall moment! They can’t stop us now!"

Let's hope....

Ali G

3,526 posts

282 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Ali G said:
So here's a question..

Are you vetted before you take a degree in climatology?

Quite fancy taking some time off and getting stuck in! Although I may not be 'on message'
There's one item on the interviewer's clipboard these days:

Q: Do you want to save the pwanet?

A:
I'll have to go undercover then....

Yes I do want to save the Polar Bears! (Although they seem to be doing rather well) banghead

The Excession

11,669 posts

250 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
deeps said:
Smith & Jones haha.

BBC1's The One Show at 7pm had Delia Smith as a guest. They were disussing the Cumbrian floods, and [b]Delia said she's taking it all very seriously now, wearing extra clothes and turning the heating down.[b]

There's nothing worse than watching gullible celebs preaching Man Made-up Global Warming.
Spoilt fking we. I've run out of clothes and I wish I had some fking heating to turn up.

yes yes yes, I just got off the phone to my ex and I'm feeling a bit grumpy

The Excession

11,669 posts

250 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
chris watton said:
"Climategate: this is our Berlin Wall moment!"

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/...

"I’ve just had a great, very sympathetic interview about Climategate on LBC radio (London’s main commercial news and talk station) with Petrie Hosken. She told me she has been simply inundated with callers, all of them utterly unconvinced that human influence has made any significant on so-called “Global Warming”. She was desperate to get a few balancing calls from people who do believe in AGW but just couldn’t find any.

Can you imagine this happening a year ago? Or even a month ago? Until Climategate, we “Sceptics” were considered freaks – almost as bad as Holocaust deniers – beyond the pale of reasonable balanced discussion. Suddenly we’re the norm. Climategate has finally given us the chance to express openly what many of us secretly openlyfeltknew and were discussing all along:
EFA