Televised Leaders Debates..

Author
Discussion

zygalski

7,759 posts

145 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
XCP said:
How about a public vote? Top 4 get to debate on TV.
No no. This is all wrong.
We need a televised debate by all 7 arguing their individual cases & followed by a national referendum to decide the final 4. Of course Alan Sugar should get the final say who goes through, but only after all 7 have lived in a house with multiple cameras in for at least a month. Then they should all do a series of tests in a jungle. I'll call them "Jungle Tests". Eating grubs & whatnot. Natalie Bennett will provide the sweaty white T-shirt totty factor.
This is the kind of politics we want. Sky News told me so.

Axionknight

8,505 posts

135 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
You just need to watch some of the American Democrat or Republican party presidential candidate debates to see how pointless holding a debate with so many people is. But of course Cameron knows that. With so many candidates there will be very little debate and simply lots of soundbites, a bit like party political broadcasts.

The Cameron vs Miliband one-on-one debate is a must considering only one of these can be PM. Cameron should wipe the floor with Miliband which makes this decision, made primarily by Lynton Crosby and Gideon it appears, completely bizarre and counterproductive.
I agree, I really cannot see what D.C would stand to lose on a one on one debate, he's a far better speaker than Ed is, and I think it will damage his cause if he refuses.

Walford

2,259 posts

166 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
classic DC he knows he will make mince meat of EM, but he will make labour force the debate on him 10 out of 10

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
BBC now reporting that because it has said the DUP can't join in the 7-way debate, it may apply to Court to judicially review the BBC.

Lots of predictable quotes: Sturgeon in particular goes straight for "arrogant" and "Tory". Miliband has foolishly, IMO, offered himself up for a one on one grilling by Paxman. That is something I would very much like to see.

I wouldn't be surprised to see the whole debate idea implode, which is one assumes what the Cons are angling for. I can't really see the broadcasters being interested in Miliband v Clegg, because it is not good entertainment, and I seriously doubt they will "empty chair" a sitting PM, because it will look (and be) massively partisan.

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

137 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
Walford said:
classic DC he knows he will make mince meat of EM, but he will make labour force the debate on him 10 out of 10
I'm not sure many agree with your assessment of the situation.

Ecosseven

1,982 posts

217 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
Does seem a strange decision by CMD. Why doesn't he want to debate Ed M. one to one?

0a

23,901 posts

194 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
I don't really understand why Cameron is choosing to make himself look scared.

Northern Munkee

5,354 posts

200 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
Mi
Ecosseven said:
Does seem a strange decision by CMD. Why doesn't he want to debate Ed M. one to one?
In case the lemmings think EM looks remotely electable simply by being on a platform with him.

I can see why DC doesn't want a debate when he is seen as the best of a shabby bunch of potential PM by some margin.

C4 News have run in as many labour persons to say "Running Scared" as many times as possible guess that was the text received from labour HQ to all MPs today.

basherX

2,484 posts

161 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
0a said:
I don't really understand why Cameron is choosing to make himself look scared.
It's a political calculation. They assume that Miliband is already established in the public mind as a weak leader- he consistently has lower personal ratings than the party he represents. As such he has more upside than Cameron from the exposure and thus the Conservatives calculate that the negative to them effect of (effectively) blocking the debates is lesser than the potential upside to Miliband from them occurring. They don't want to a repeat of the last debates which arguably provided Clegg, widely assumed to be weak, a surprise boost.

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
basherX said:
0a said:
I don't really understand why Cameron is choosing to make himself look scared.
It's a political calculation. They assume that Miliband is already established in the public mind as a weak leader- he consistently has lower personal ratings than the party he represents. As such he has more upside than Cameron from the exposure and thus the Conservatives calculate that the negative to them effect of (effectively) blocking the debates is lesser than the potential upside to Miliband from them occurring. They don't want to a repeat of the last debates which arguably provided Clegg, widely assumed to be weak, a surprise boost.
Pretty much that. In a debate of 7 parties it's everyone vs. the PM, which puts him apart from the rest since he's their target. In a one-on-one situation, Miliband gets elevated to equal billing with the PM, which gives him a big boost. The calculation is: CMD is seen as a pompous tt vs. EM looking a little less like a work experience boy. Given that everyone thinks CMD is a bit of a pompous tt anyway the answer seems clear.

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

137 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
davepoth said:
basherX said:
0a said:
I don't really understand why Cameron is choosing to make himself look scared.
It's a political calculation. They assume that Miliband is already established in the public mind as a weak leader- he consistently has lower personal ratings than the party he represents. As such he has more upside than Cameron from the exposure and thus the Conservatives calculate that the negative to them effect of (effectively) blocking the debates is lesser than the potential upside to Miliband from them occurring. They don't want to a repeat of the last debates which arguably provided Clegg, widely assumed to be weak, a surprise boost.
Pretty much that. In a debate of 7 parties it's everyone vs. the PM, which puts him apart from the rest since he's their target. In a one-on-one situation, Miliband gets elevated to equal billing with the PM, which gives him a big boost. The calculation is: CMD is seen as a pompous tt vs. EM looking a little less like a work experience boy. Given that everyone thinks CMD is a bit of a pompous tt anyway the answer seems clear.
Given how bad this is making Cameron look the Tories must be st scared of a debate with Miliband to think this is their best option.





greygoose

8,262 posts

195 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
Walford said:
classic DC he knows he will make mince meat of EM, but he will make labour force the debate on him 10 out of 10
I'm not sure many agree with your assessment of the situation.
Indeed, Cameron appears weak and if he can't face debating with Miliband then he is a weakling as it should be a walkover. Truly a pathetic show by the Tories, only the politics nerds will watch the show anyway and the rest of Britain will vote the way they always have done or whatever newspaper they read tells them to.

Yazar

1,476 posts

120 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
basherX said:
0a said:
I don't really understand why Cameron is choosing to make himself look scared.
It's a political calculation. They assume that Miliband is already established in the public mind as a weak leader- he consistently has lower personal ratings than the party he represents. As such he has more upside than Cameron from the exposure and thus the Conservatives calculate that the negative to them effect of (effectively) blocking the debates is lesser than the potential upside to Miliband from them occurring. They don't want to a repeat of the last debates which arguably provided Clegg, widely assumed to be weak, a surprise boost.
It's political calculation from people who are out of touch.

The people demand courage in their leaders- can't take on Miliband on TV so how will he take back the Falklands and all that.

Essentially they are banking on the fact that they will be vastly outspending Labour in this campaign, and that money will talk.

StevieBee

12,905 posts

255 months

Thursday 5th March 2015
quotequote all
basherX said:
0a said:
I don't really understand why Cameron is choosing to make himself look scared.
It's a political calculation. They assume that Miliband is already established in the public mind as a weak leader- he consistently has lower personal ratings than the party he represents. As such he has more upside than Cameron from the exposure and thus the Conservatives calculate that the negative to them effect of (effectively) blocking the debates is lesser than the potential upside to Miliband from them occurring. They don't want to a repeat of the last debates which arguably provided Clegg, widely assumed to be weak, a surprise boost.
Bang on. This is all political manoeuvring and nothing to do with weakness.

The elephant in the room for labour is also the SNP so bring them into the debate and added pressure is heaped upon Miliband.


BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
So tonight we have the the ITV Leaders’ Debate.




itv.com said:
ITV has today confirmed further format details for The ITV Leaders’ Debate, which will be shown live on ITV from 8pm to 10pm on Thursday 2nd April, and will be moderated by ITV News anchor Julie Etchingham.

Lots have been drawn to determine the podium order, and the leaders will appear on screen, left to right as follows - Natalie Bennett, Nick Clegg, Nigel Farage, Ed Miliband, Leanne Wood, Nicola Sturgeon and David Cameron.

The drawing of lots for the podium positions also decided the order in which each leader speaks on the opening and closing statements and on the initial answers to the audience questions. The speaking order follows a pre-determined grid (PDF below). The way the lots were drawn means that Natalie Bennett will be the first speaker in the debate and David Cameron the last.

The leaders will make short opening statements at the beginning of the programme and closing statements at the conclusion of the debate.

During the two-hour live debate, leaders will address questions posed by the studio audience.


The format will allow each leader to give an uninterrupted one-minute answer to each question, before the debate is opened to moderated discussion between the leaders, for up to 18 minutes on each question.
itv.com said:
The audience of around 200 people has been selected by polling company ICM. It is broadly demographically representative of the UK. It is also politically balanced.

Around 80% of the audience will be made up of voters who express a voting intention at the time of recruitment. Around 20% of the audience will be “undecided”, defined as being interested in politics and intending to vote, but not having decided which party to vote for at the time of recruitment.
http://www.itv.com/presscentre/press-packs/itv-leaders-debate-format-details

Soov535

35,829 posts

271 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
Farage is going to wipe the floor with this bunch of chinless tosspots.


Planet Blatark-9

332 posts

200 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all

I think it will be difficult for anyone to get much of a say here, there's far too many people - exactly what Cameron wanted.


mikal83

5,340 posts

252 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
Wheres Mebyon kernow............

kev1974

4,029 posts

129 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
I don't even know or care who Natalie Bennett and Leanne Wood are. Never heard of them or from them before so why would I care now who they are. Waste of air time.

handpaper

1,296 posts

203 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
Soov535 said:
Farage is going to wipe the floor with this bunch of chinless tosspots.
With reference to a comment above about how they will all gang up on Cameron, I think there's a significant risk that all will attack Farage. The main three and the SNP are vulnerable over the EU; Labour, SNP and the Greens are weak on the economy, and no-one else has anything that looks like an immigration policy.
It's possible that they will seek to distract from these by attacking UKIP. Of course, such a course may not do them any good, for various reasons...